Literature DB >> 24637897

The influence of the donor-recipient relationship on related donor reactions to stem cell donation.

S Labott1, A Pfammatter2.   

Abstract

Previous research has begun to delineate the complicated reactions experienced by bone marrow and stem cell donors. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the donor-recipient relationship on the related donor's emotional reactions. Twenty-eight adult stem cell donors completed questionnaires before donation, 30 days post stem cell infusion, and 1 year after infusion. Questionnaires addressed the donor-recipient relationship, depression, mood, guilt and responsibility, self-esteem, ambivalence about donation and reactions to the donation itself. Results indicated that most donors reported little ambivalence about donation, and their reactions to the donation itself were generally positive. Closer and more positive donor-recipient relationships were associated with less anticipated guilt and responsibility if the transplant did not work. The relationships between the donor and the recipient did not change over time. Mood disturbance and depression were low overall, not related to the donor-recipient relationship, and did not significantly change over time. These results indicate that related stem cell donors are generally without significant emotional distress, and are comfortable with the donation process. Further, a more positive relationship with the recipient may help donors to avoid feeling guilty and responsible if the transplant does not work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24637897     DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2014.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  16 in total

1.  Pediatric sibling donors of successful and unsuccessful hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT): a qualitative study of their psychosocial experience.

Authors:  Kendra D MacLeod; Stan F Whitsett; Eric J Mash; Wendy Pelletier
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2003-06

2.  Managing a dual role--experiences and coping strategies of parents donating haploidentical G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells to their children.

Authors:  S M van Walraven; L M Ball; H M Koopman; G E Switzer; C M H Ropes-de Jong; A de Jong; R G M Bredius; R M Egeler
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Understanding donors' motivations: a study of unrelated bone marrow donors.

Authors:  G E Switzer; M A Dew; V A Butterworth; R G Simmons; M Schimmel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The effects of bereavement on adult sibling bone marrow donors' psychological well-being and reactions to donation.

Authors:  G E Switzer; M A Dew; C A Magistro; J M Goycoolea; R K Twillman; C Alter; R G Simmons
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 5.  Psychodynamic themes of bone marrow transplantation. When I becomes thou.

Authors:  A D Futterman; D K Wellisch
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.722

6.  A comparison of related and unrelated marrow donors.

Authors:  G Chang; C McGarigle; T R Spitzer; S L McAfee; F Harris; K Piercy; M N Goetz; J H Antin
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Short form of depression inventory: cross-validation.

Authors:  A T Beck; W Y Rial; K Rickels
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1974-06

8.  Psychological adjustment of adult bone marrow transplant donors whose recipient survives.

Authors:  D L Wolcott; D K Wellisch; F I Fawzy; J Landsverk
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Psychosocial effects of unrelated bone marrow donation: experiences of the National Marrow Donor Program.

Authors:  V A Butterworth; R G Simmons; G Bartsch; B Randall; M Schimmel; D F Stroncek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Symptoms of pain and depression in related marrow donors: changes after transplant.

Authors:  Grace Chang; Carol McGarigle; Danielle Koby; Joseph H Antin
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

View more
  4 in total

1.  Experiences and unmet needs of family members requested to donate haematopoietic stem cells to an ill relative: findings from a prospective multi-centre study.

Authors:  Nienke Zomerdijk; Jane Turner; Geoffrey R Hill; David Gottlieb
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingping Wang; Li Zhu; Xubiao Xie; Haifeng Wang; Hui Yin; Chunhua Fang; Helong Dai
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Centers with FACT-JACIE Accreditation Have Significantly Better Compliance with Related Donor Care Standards.

Authors:  Chloe Anthias; Paul V O'Donnell; Deidre M Kiefer; Jean Yared; Maxim Norkin; Paolo Anderlini; Bipin N Savani; Miguel A Diaz; Menachem Bitan; Joerg P Halter; Brent R Logan; Galen E Switzer; Michael A Pulsipher; Dennis L Confer; Bronwen E Shaw
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The Core of Sibling Stem Cell Donation - A Grounded Theory Study.

Authors:  Annika M Kisch; Anna Forsberg
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2017-06-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.