Literature DB >> 9560864

A comparison of related and unrelated marrow donors.

G Chang1, C McGarigle, T R Spitzer, S L McAfee, F Harris, K Piercy, M N Goetz, J H Antin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation is to test whether related bone marrow donors experience more distress from marrow donation than volunteer unrelated donors.
METHOD: Participants in the study were 77 related and unrelated marrow donors who agreed to complete 11 pre- and 8 postdonation self report questionnaires. Related and unrelated donors were recruited from the Bone Marrow Transplant Programs at the Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA. Additional unrelated donors were recruited from the American Red Cross-Carolinas and the Heart of America Bone Marrow Donor Registry in Kansas City, MO.
RESULTS: The 41 unrelated and 36 related marrow donors who participated in this prospective study had similar demographic backgrounds and predonation questionnaire results, although related donors endorsed more items on the Beck Depression Inventory, both before and after narrow harvesting. After narrow donation, related donors reported significantly more pain than unrelated donors (p = .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: It is unlikely that intraoperative events alone could account for the increased pain experienced by related donors. Related donors were more likely to experience moderate to severe physical pain after marrow donation than unrelated donors, on the basis of logistic regression analysis (odds ratio = 7.63; 95% confidence interval 2.74, 23.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9560864     DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199803000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  7 in total

1.  The influence of the donor-recipient relationship on related donor reactions to stem cell donation.

Authors:  S Labott; A Pfammatter
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  A review of the haematopoietic stem cell donation experience: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  A Billen; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Practice patterns for evaluation, consent, and care of related donors and recipients at hematopoietic cell transplantation centers in the United States.

Authors:  Paul V O'Donnell; Tanya L Pedersen; Dennis L Confer; J Douglas Rizzo; Michael A Pulsipher; David Stroncek; Susan Leitman; Paolo Anderlini
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Hematopoietic stem cell donation.

Authors:  Shu-Huey Chen; Tso-Fu Wang; Kuo-Liang Yang
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  The policy statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics -- children as hematopoietic stem cell donors -- a proposal of modifications for application in the UK.

Authors:  Tak Kwong Chan; George Lim Tipoe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Losing the genetic twin: donor grief after unsuccessful unrelated stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Martina Wanner; Sandra Bochert; Iris M Schreyer; Gabi Rall; Claudia Rutt; Alexander H Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The Attitudes of Chinese Cancer Patients and Family Caregivers toward Advance Directives.

Authors:  Qiu Zhang; Chuanbo Xie; Shanghang Xie; Qing Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.