Literature DB >> 9203278

Understanding donors' motivations: a study of unrelated bone marrow donors.

G E Switzer1, M A Dew, V A Butterworth, R G Simmons, M Schimmel.   

Abstract

Medical advances in bone marrow transplantation techniques and immunosuppressive medications have dramatically increased the number of such transplants performed each year, and consequently, the demand for bone marrow from unrelated donors. Although physiological aspects of bone marrow donation have been thoroughly investigated, very few studies have examined psychosocial factors that may impact individuals' donation decisions and outcomes. To examine one particular set of donor psychosocial issues, this study investigated motives for bone marrow donation among 343 unrelated bone marrow donors who donated through the National Marrow Donor Program. Six distinct types of donor motives were identified from open-ended questionnaire responses. Donors most frequently reported motives reflecting some awareness of both the costs (to themselves) and potential benefits (to themselves and the recipient) of donation. A desire to act in accordance with social or religious precepts, expected positive feelings about donating, empathy for the recipient, and the simple desire to help another person were also commonly cited reasons for donating. Among a series of donor background characteristics, donors' gender was the variable most strongly associated with motive type; women were most likely to cite expected positive feelings, empathy, and the desire to help someone. Central study findings indicated that donor motives predicted donors reactions to donation even after the effects of donor background characteristics (including gender) were controlled. Donors who reported exchange motives (weighing costs and benefits) and donors who reported simple (or idealized) helping motives experienced the donation as less positive in terms of higher predonation ambivalence and negative postdonation psychological reactions than did remaining donors. Donors who reported positive feeling and empathy motives had the most positive donation reactions in terms of lower ambivalence, and feeling like better persons postdonation. These finding add substantially to the body of work concerning medical volunteerism generally, and also have important practical implications for the recruitment and education of potential bone marrow donors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9203278     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00327-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  10 in total

1.  Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women with regard to collection, testing and banking of cord blood stem cells.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Kevin Gordon; Michiel Van den Hof; Shaureen Taweel; Françoise Baylis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The influence of the donor-recipient relationship on related donor reactions to stem cell donation.

Authors:  S Labott; A Pfammatter
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  A review of the haematopoietic stem cell donation experience: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  A Billen; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Giving blood and enrolling on the stem cell donor registry: ranking of obstacles and motives in Switzerland.

Authors:  Thomas Bart; Thomas Volken; Yvonne Fischer; Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Social and Financial Outcomes of Living Liver Donation: A Prospective Investigation Within the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study 2 (A2ALL-2).

Authors:  A DiMartini; M A Dew; Q Liu; M A Simpson; D P Ladner; A R Smith; J Zee; S Abbey; B W Gillespie; R Weinrieb; M S Mandell; R A Fisher; J C Emond; C E Freise; A H Sherker; Z Butt
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Patterns and predictors of sexual function after liver donation: The Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort study.

Authors:  Andrea F DiMartini; Mary Amanda Dew; Zeeshan Butt; Mary Ann Simpson; Daniela P Ladner; Abigail R Smith; Peg Hill-Callahan; Brenda W Gillespie
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 7.  Gender imbalance in living organ donation.

Authors:  Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2002

Review 8.  Hematopoietic stem cell donation.

Authors:  Shu-Huey Chen; Tso-Fu Wang; Kuo-Liang Yang
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Gaps in the Public's Knowledge About Chronic Pain: Representative Sample of Hispanic Residents From 5 States.

Authors:  Barbara J Turner; Yuanyuan Liang; Natalia Rodriguez; Melissa A Valerio; Andrea Rochat; Jennifer S Potter; Paula Winkler
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Donation of peripheral blood stem cells to unrelated strangers: A thematic analysis.

Authors:  Annelies Billen; J Alejandro Madrigal; Katrina Scior; Bronwen E Shaw; Andre Strydom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.