Nienke Zomerdijk1,2,3,4, Jane Turner5,6, Geoffrey R Hill5,6,7,8, David Gottlieb9,10. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. nienke.zomerdijk@unimelb.edu.au. 2. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. nienke.zomerdijk@unimelb.edu.au. 3. Bone Marrow Transplant Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. nienke.zomerdijk@unimelb.edu.au. 4. School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. nienke.zomerdijk@unimelb.edu.au. 5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 6. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 7. Bone Marrow Transplant Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 8. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 9. Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 10. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite well-documented physical effects of haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donation, far less attention has been focused on the psychosocial impact for family donors. This study aimed to better understand the psychosocial aspects of HSC donation by family members, focusing, in particular on their needs for information and supportive care. METHODS: Thirty-one adult HSC family donors from two clinical hospitals were interviewed before, during and 1 month after HSC donation. Interviews explored ambivalence, motivation, perceived pressure, preparedness, the donor-recipient relationship, information and support received and suggestions for improvement. RESULTS: Three main themes about the donation experience were identified: 'call to arms' (focused on the recipient, stressful urgency, making meaning of being a donor, decisional ambivalence), 'proceeding with donation' (living in limbo, unsettling uncertainty, pervasive pain, feeling supported) and 'after the dust settles' (feeling discarded, downplaying role, residual symptoms, dealing with adverse recipient outcomes). Underlying system and communication issues included time for consideration prior to donor work-up, management of confidentiality, information inadequacy and access to support. Donors wanted information about the emotional challenges specific to being a family donor, such as ways in which previous donors coped with recipient death. For donors whose recipient had died, the priority for improved care was follow-up support. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasise a gap in information and supportive care for family donors and the need for a protocol specifically designed to inform and support family donors before, during and after HSC donation.
BACKGROUND: Despite well-documented physical effects of haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donation, far less attention has been focused on the psychosocial impact for family donors. This study aimed to better understand the psychosocial aspects of HSC donation by family members, focusing, in particular on their needs for information and supportive care. METHODS: Thirty-one adult HSC family donors from two clinical hospitals were interviewed before, during and 1 month after HSC donation. Interviews explored ambivalence, motivation, perceived pressure, preparedness, the donor-recipient relationship, information and support received and suggestions for improvement. RESULTS: Three main themes about the donation experience were identified: 'call to arms' (focused on the recipient, stressful urgency, making meaning of being a donor, decisional ambivalence), 'proceeding with donation' (living in limbo, unsettling uncertainty, pervasive pain, feeling supported) and 'after the dust settles' (feeling discarded, downplaying role, residual symptoms, dealing with adverse recipient outcomes). Underlying system and communication issues included time for consideration prior to donor work-up, management of confidentiality, information inadequacy and access to support. Donors wanted information about the emotional challenges specific to being a family donor, such as ways in which previous donors coped with recipient death. For donors whose recipient had died, the priority for improved care was follow-up support. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasise a gap in information and supportive care for family donors and the need for a protocol specifically designed to inform and support family donors before, during and after HSC donation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Family donors; Haematopoietic stem cell transplant; Information; Psycho-oncology; Supportive care
Authors: Erika Arantes de Oliveira-Cardoso; Manoel Antônio dos Santos; Ana Paula Mastropietro; Júlio César Voltarelli Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2010 Sep-Oct
Authors: Mary E D Flowers; Yoshihiro Inamoto; Paul A Carpenter; Stephanie J Lee; Hans-Peter Kiem; Effie W Petersdorf; Shalini E Pereira; Richard A Nash; Marco Mielcarek; Matthew L Fero; Edus H Warren; Jean E Sanders; Rainer F Storb; Frederick R Appelbaum; Barry E Storer; Paul J Martin Journal: Blood Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Melhem Solh; Xu Zhang; Katelin Connor; Stacey Brown; Scott R Solomon; Lawrence E Morris; H Kent Holland; Asad Bashey Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702