Literature DB >> 24634709

Minireview on laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Clara Tan-Tam1, Stephen W Chung1.   

Abstract

The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in the mid-1980s. Since then, laparoscopic surgery has continued to gain prominence in numerous fields, and has, in some fields, replaced open surgery as the preferred operative technique. The role of laparoscopy in staging cancer is controversial, with regards to gallbladder carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma, laparoscopy in conjunction with intraoperative ultrasound has prevented nontherapeutic operations, and facilitated therapeutic operations. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred option in the management of gallbladder disease. Meta-analyses comparing laparoscopic to open distal pancreatectomy show that laparoscopic pancreatectomy is safe and efficacious in the management of benign and malignant disease, and have better patient outcomes. A pancreaticoduodenectomy is a more complex operation and the laparoscopic technique is not feasible for this operation at this time. Robotic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy has been tried with limited success at this time, but with continuing advancement in this field, this operation would eventually be feasible. Liver resection remains to be the best management for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal liver metastases. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown that laparoscopic liver resections result in patients with equal or less blood loss and shorter hospital stays, as compared to open surgery. With improving equipment and technique, and the incorporation of robotic surgery, minimally invasive liver resection operative times will improve and be more efficacious. With the incorporation of robotic surgery into hepatobiliary surgery, donor hepatectomies have also been completed with success. The management of benign and malignant disease with minimally invasive hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery is safe and efficacious.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic; Liver resection; Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Tumour

Year:  2014        PMID: 24634709      PMCID: PMC3952161          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i3.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  74 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: trans-Canada experience with 2201 cases.

Authors:  D E Litwin; M J Girotti; E C Poulin; J Mamazza; A G Nagy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Current status of robotic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Stefano Partelli; Andrea Coratti; Jacopo Desiderio; Amilcare Parisi; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.279

4.  Outcome of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Tan To Cheung; Ronnie T P Poon; Wai Key Yuen; Kenneth S H Chok; Simon H Y Tsang; Thomas Yau; See Ching Chan; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Gerard J Abood; M Fatih Can; Mustapha Daouadi; Harold T Huss; Jennifer Y Steve; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Michael Stang; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Use of a colonoscope for distal duodenal stent placement in patients with malignant obstruction.

Authors:  Suzanne M Jeurnink; Alessandro Repici; Carmelo Luigiano; Nico Pagano; Ernst J Kuipers; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Increased incidence of pancreatic fistulas after the introduction of a bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in distal pancreatic resections.

Authors:  Eduardo A Guzman; Rebecca A Nelson; Joseph Kim; Alessio Pigazzi; Vijay Trisal; Benjamin Paz; Joshua Di Ellenhorn
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a "true" R0 resection?

Authors:  Ioannis T Konstantinidis; Andrew L Warshaw; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Vikram Deshpande; Theodore S Hong; Eunice L Kwak; Gregory Y Lauwers; David P Ryan; Jennifer A Wargo; Keith D Lillemoe; Cristina R Ferrone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Palliation of biliary and duodenal obstruction in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: endoscopy or surgery?

Authors:  F Maire; A Sauvanet
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.043

Review 10.  Pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy R Donahue; Howard A Reber
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.287

View more
  2 in total

1.  Providing complex GI surgical care with minimally invasive approaches: a survey of the practice patterns of Fellowship Council alumni.

Authors:  Joshua J Weis; Adnan A Alseidi; D Rohan Jeyarajah; Michael A Schweitzer; Yumi Hori; Vanessa Cheung; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Animal ethics in laparoscopic urology training.

Authors:  Eymen Gazel; Ayşegül Özgök; Ahmet Murat Bayraktar; Osman Ergün; Yaşar Özgök
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.