Literature DB >> 23325340

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Gerard J Abood1, M Fatih Can, Mustapha Daouadi, Harold T Huss, Jennifer Y Steve, Lekshmi Ramalingam, Michael Stang, David L Bartlett, Herbert J Zeh, A James Moser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central pancreatectomy is a definitive treatment for low-grade tumors of the pancreatic neck that preserves pancreatic and splenic function at the potential expense of postoperative pancreatic fistula. We analyzed outcomes after robot-assisted central pancreatectomy (RACP) to reexamine the risk-benefit profile in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of nine RACP performed between August 2009 through June 2010 at a single institution.
RESULTS: The average age of the cohort was 64 (range 18-75 years) with six women (67 %). Indications for surgery included: five benign cystic neoplasm and four pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Median operative time was 425 min (range 305-506 min) with 190 ml median blood loss (range 50-350 ml) and one conversion to open due to poor visualization. Median tumor size was 3.0 cm (range 1.9-6.0 cm); all patients achieved R0 status. Pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in seven cases and pancreaticojejunostomy in two. The median length of hospital stay was 10 days (range 7-19). Two clinically significant pancreatic fistulae occurred with one requiring percutaneous drainage. No patients exhibited worsening diabetes or exocrine insufficiency at the 30-day postoperative visit.
CONCLUSIONS: RACP can be performed with safety and oncologic outcomes equivalent to published open series. Although the rate of pancreatic fistula was high, only 22 % had clinically significant events, and none developed worsening pancreatic endocrine or exocrine dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23325340     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2137-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  42 in total

1.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Roux-en-Y end-to-end and end-to-side double pancreaticojejunostomy: application of the reconstructive method of the Beger procedure to central pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Piero Chirletti; Nadia Peparini; Roberto Caronna; Gianfranco Fanello; Giovanna Delogu; Roberto Luca Meniconi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Postoperative glycemic control after central pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions.

Authors:  John D Allendorf; Beth A Schrope; Margaret H Lauerman; William B Inabnet; John A Chabot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Initial experiences using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Hoon Sang Chi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Segmental pancreatectomy for the diagnosis and treatment of small lesions in the neck or body of the pancreas.

Authors:  S Ikeda; S Matsumoto; K Maeshiro; R Miyazaki; K Okamoto; Y Yasunami
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

7.  Laparoscopic approach for solitary insulinoma: a multicentre study.

Authors:  A Ayav; L Bresler; L Brunaud; P Boissel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique?

Authors:  Clifford S Cho; David A Kooby; C Max Schmidt; Attila Nakeeb; David J Bentrem; Nipun B Merchant; Alexander A Parikh; Ronald C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Syed A Ahmad; Hong J Kim; Nicholas Hamilton; William G Hawkins; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Middle pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a technique, operative outcomes, and long-term pancreatic function.

Authors:  Takeshi Sudo; Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayashidani; Yasushi Hashimoto; Hiroki Ohge; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  No mortality after 150 consecutive pancreatoduodenctomies with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayashidani; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Naoya Nakagawa; Hiroki Ohge; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  State of the art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  Luca Milone; Despoina Daskalaki; Eduardo Fernandes; Isacco Damoli; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic long sleeve pancreaticogastrostomy (LPG): a novel pancreatic anastomosis following central pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Long R Jiao; Tamara M H Gall; Mikael H Sodergren; Ruifang Fan
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 3.  Minireview on laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Clara Tan-Tam; Stephen W Chung
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-16

Review 4.  [Minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery for pancreatic cystic tumors].

Authors:  T Welsch; M Distler; J Weitz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; A James Moser; Brian A Boone; David L Bartlett; Mazen Zenati; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Minimally invasive surgical approach to pancreatic malignancies.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Mario Annecchiarico; Marco Farsi; Ilenia Bartolini; Vita Mirasolo; Francesco Guerra; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

7.  Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Zi-Zheng Wang; Yuan-Xing Gao; Yong Xu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  Minimally invasive central pancreatectomy and pancreatogastrostomy: current surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Ammar A Javed; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-08-10

Review 9.  Robotic central pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmad Hamad; Stephanie Novak; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-07-26

Review 10.  Insulinoma After Bariatric Surgery: Diagnostic Dilemma and Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Christopher M Mulla; Alessandra Storino; Eric U Yee; David Lautz; Mandeep S Sawnhey; A James Moser; Mary-Elizabeth Patti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.