Literature DB >> 31209609

Providing complex GI surgical care with minimally invasive approaches: a survey of the practice patterns of Fellowship Council alumni.

Joshua J Weis1,2, Adnan A Alseidi3, D Rohan Jeyarajah4, Michael A Schweitzer5, Yumi Hori6, Vanessa Cheung6, Daniel J Scott7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Fellowship Council (FC) oversees 172 non-ACGME surgical fellowships offering 211 fellowship positions per year. These training programs cover multiple specialties including Advanced gastrointestinal (GI), Advanced GI/MIS, Bariatric, Hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB), Flexible Endoscopy, Colorectal, and Thoracic Surgery. Although some data have been published detailing the practice environments (i.e., urban vs. rural) and yearly total case volumes of FC alumni, there is a lack of granular data regarding the practice patterns of FC graduates. The aim of this study was to gather detailed data on the specific case types performed and surgical approaches employed by recent FC alumni.
METHODS: A 21-item survey covering 64 data points was emailed to 835 FC alumni who completed their fellowship between 2013 and 2017. Email addresses were obtained from FC program directors and FC archives.
RESULTS: We received 327 responses (39% response rate). HPB, Advanced Colorectal, and Advanced Thoracic alumni appear to establish practices focused on their respective fields. Graduates from Advanced GI, Adv GI/MIS, and Bariatric programs appear to build practices with a mix of several complex GI case types including bariatrics, colorectal, foregut, HPB, and hernia cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large data set to provide granular information on the practice patterns of FC alumni. FC trained surgeons perform impressive volumes of complex procedures, and minimally invasive approaches are extremely prevalent in these practices. Further, many graduates carve out practices with large footprints in robotics and endoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fellowship; Minimally invasive surgery; Surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31209609     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06929-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery fellowship graduates: Their demographics, practice patterns, and contributions.

Authors:  Adrian E Park; Erica R H Sutton; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Adrian Park; Marty Arregui; Morris Franklin; C Daniel Smith; Christina Blaney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset.

Authors:  MacKenzie Landin; John C Kubasiak; Scott Schimpke; Jennifer Poirier; Jonathan A Myers; Keith W Millikan; Minh B Luu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP.

Authors:  Cigdem Benlice; Erman Aytac; Meagan Costedio; Hermann Kessler; Maher A Abbas; Feza H Remzi; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 5.  Centralization of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Johanna A M G Tol; Thomas M van Gulik; Olivier R C Busch; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.588

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: a prospective study.

Authors:  J A Lujan; P Parrilla; R Robles; P Marin; J A Torralba; J Garcia-Ayllon
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-02

7.  SAGES's advanced GI/MIS fellowship curriculum pilot project.

Authors:  Joshua J Weis; Matthew Goldblatt; Aurora Pryor; Brian J Dunkin; L Michael Brunt; Daniel B Jones; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass surgery: differences in patient demographics, safety, and outcomes.

Authors:  Gaurav Banka; Gavitt Woodard; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; John M Morton
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06

9.  Open vs laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  B S Håkanson; K B A Thor; A Thorell; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset.

Authors:  John C Kubasiak; Mackenzie Landin; Scott Schimpke; Jennifer Poirier; Jonathan A Myers; Keith W Millikan; Minh B Luu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Defining benchmarks for fellowship training in foregut surgery: a 10-year review of fellowship council index cases.

Authors:  Joshua J Weis; Aurora Pryor; Adnan Alseidi; Juan Tellez; Matthew I Goldblatt; Samer Mattar; Kenric Murayama; Michael Awad; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.