Literature DB >> 24633674

Emotional and Social Factors influence Poker Decision Making Accuracy.

Michael Laakasuo1, Jussi Palomäki, Mikko Salmela.   

Abstract

Poker is a social game, where success depends on both game strategic knowledge and emotion regulation abilities. Thus, poker provides a productive environment for studying the effects of emotional and social factors on micro-economic decision making. Previous research indicates that experiencing negative emotions, such as moral anger, reduces mathematical accuracy in poker decision making. Furthermore, various social aspects of the game—such as losing against "bad players" due to "bad luck"—seem to fuel these emotional states. We designed an Internet-based experiment, where participants' (N = 459) mathematical accuracy in five different poker decision making tasks were assessed. In addition, we manipulated the emotional and social conditions under which the tasks were presented, in a 2 × 2 experimental setup: (1) Anger versus neutral emotional state—participants were primed either with an anger-inducing, or emotionally neutral story, and (2) Social cue versus non-social cue—during the tasks, either an image of a pair of human eyes was "following" the mouse cursor, or an image of a black moving box was presented. The results showed that anger reduced mathematical accuracy of decision making only when participants were "being watched" by a pair of moving eyes. Experienced poker players made mathematically more accurate decisions than inexperienced ones. The results contribute to current understanding on how emotional and social factors influence decision making accuracy in economic games.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24633674     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-014-9454-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  18 in total

1.  Fear, anger, and risk.

Authors:  J S Lerner; D Keltner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions.

Authors:  A R Damasio; T J Grabowski; A Bechara; H Damasio; L L Ponto; J Parvizi; R D Hichwa
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Alan G Sanfey; James K Rilling; Jessica A Aronson; Leigh E Nystrom; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Sylvia A Morelli; Kelly Lowenberg; Leigh E Nystrom; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-12-26

5.  Social and psychological challenges of poker.

Authors:  Kyle Siler
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-09

6.  The online poker sub-culture: dialogues, interactions and networks.

Authors:  Killian O'Leary; Conor Carroll
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-12

7.  Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions.

Authors:  Laura Moretti; Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-04

8.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Daniel Nettle; Gilbert Roberts
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 9.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Human wagering behavior depends on opponents' faces.

Authors:  Erik J Schlicht; Shinsuke Shimojo; Colin F Camerer; Peter Battaglia; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Gambling Problem Trajectories and Associated Individuals Risk Factors: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study Among Poker Players.

Authors:  Magali Dufour; Adèle Morvannou; Natacha Brunelle; Sylvia Kairouz; Émélie Laverdière; Louise Nadeau; Djamal Berbiche; Élise Roy
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2020-03

2.  "It did not apply to me": poker players' perspectives of prevention messages.

Authors:  Adèle Morvannou; Eva Monson; Annie-Claude Savard; Sylvia Kairouz; Élise Roy; Magali Dufour
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-01-13

3.  Experience and Passion in Poker: Are There Well-Being Implications?

Authors:  Apostolos Oikonomidis; Jussi Palomäki; Michael Laakasuo
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2019-06

4.  Decision-Making in Gambling Disorder, Problematic Pornography Use, and Binge-Eating Disorder: Similarities and Differences.

Authors:  Gemma Mestre-Bach; Fernando Fernández-Aranda; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2020-06-27

5.  "To Bluff like a Man or Fold like a Girl?" - Gender Biased Deceptive Behavior in Online Poker.

Authors:  Jussi Palomäki; Jeff Yan; David Modic; Michael Laakasuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sleep or Play Online Poker?: Gambling Behaviors and Tilt Symptoms While Sleep Deprived.

Authors:  Alexandre Hamel; Célyne Bastien; Christian Jacques; Axelle Moreau; Isabelle Giroux
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Variability in competitive decision-making speed and quality against exploiting and exploitative opponents.

Authors:  Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Behavioural and neural modulation of win-stay but not lose-shift strategies as a function of outcome value in Rock, Paper, Scissors.

Authors:  Lewis Forder; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Psychopathology of Online Poker Players: Review of Literature.

Authors:  Axelle Moreau; Henri Chabrol; Emeline Chauchard
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 6.756

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.