| Literature DB >> 24633395 |
Jagmohan Hooda1, Ajit Shah2, Li Zhang3.
Abstract
Heme constitutes 95% of functional iron in the human body, as well as two-thirds of the average person's iron intake in developed countries. Hence, a wide range of epidemiological studies have focused on examining the association of dietary heme intake, mainly from red meat, with the risks of common diseases. High heme intake is associated with increased risk of several cancers, including colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer and lung cancer. Likewise, the evidence for increased risks of type-2 diabetes and coronary heart disease associated with high heme intake is compelling. Furthermore, recent comparative metabolic and molecular studies of lung cancer cells showed that cancer cells require increased intracellular heme biosynthesis and uptake to meet the increased demand for oxygen-utilizing hemoproteins. Increased levels of hemoproteins in turn lead to intensified oxygen consumption and cellular energy generation, thereby fueling cancer cell progression. Together, both epidemiological and molecular studies support the idea that heme positively impacts cancer progression. However, it is also worth noting that heme deficiency can cause serious diseases in humans, such as anemia, porphyrias, and Alzheimer's disease. This review attempts to summarize the latest literature in understanding the role of dietary heme intake and heme function in diverse diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24633395 PMCID: PMC3967179 DOI: 10.3390/nu6031080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Heme absorption in gut from dietary proteins. Low pH of stomach releases heme-containing proteins hemoglobin and myoglobin from dietary meat. Heme is released by the action of proteases in stomach and intestine. Intake of heme into enterocytes can be facilitated by vesicular transport system when heme binds to heme transporter or heme receptor. Additionally, heme can be directly imported into the enterocytes by HCP1. Heme is transported to the cytoplasm from the vesicles possibly by HRG-1, and is then metabolized by HO-1 present on endoplasmic reticulum. Iron is released subsequently. Alternatively, heme inside the vesicles can be metabolized by the action of HO-2 present on vesicle membrane, and the released iron (Fe2+) is transported into the cytoplasm by metal transporter DMT1 to join the common pool of iron in the cytoplasm. Elemental iron is released into the blood stream by the enterocytes via ferroportin present on the basolateral membrane. A fraction of intact heme can be released directly into the blood stream via heme transporter FLVCR1. FLVCR1 exports cytoplasmic heme, and it can export heme into the lumen during increased cellular heme content to protect from heme toxicity. HCP1, heme carrier protein 1; HRG-1, heme responsive gene-1; FLVCR1, cell surface receptor for feline leukemia virus, subgroup C, cellular receptor 1; HO-1/2, heme oxygenase-1/2; DMT1, divalent metal transporter 1; FPN1, ferroportin-1; ER, endoplasmic reticulum.
Summary of epidemiological studies investigating the association between dietary intake of heme iron and/or red meat with various diseases.
| Disease | Diet Intake | HR/OR/RR (95% CI) Highest | Reported Association | Number of Pzarticipants | Age (Years) | Years of Follow Up | Diet Assessment Method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal cancer | Red Meat | HR = 1.24 (1.12–1.36) | + | 567,169 | 50–71 | 8.2 | 124-item FFQ | [ |
| Colon cancer | High heme and low chlorophyll | RR = 1.58 (0.99–2.54) | + | 58,279 Men | 55–69 | 9.3 | 150-item semi quantitative FFQ | [ |
| Colorectal cancer with KRAS mutation | Heme Iron | HR = 1.71 (1.15–2.57) | + | 4026 | 55–69 | 7.3 | 150-item FFQ | [ |
| Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma | Red Meat | HR = 1.79 (1.07–3.01) | + | 494,979 | 50–71 | 10 | 124-item FFQ | [ |
| Heme Iron | HR = 1.47 (0.99–2.20) | |||||||
| Esophageal cancer | Red Meat | HR = 1.51 (1.09–2.08) | + | 567,169 | 50–71 | 8.2 | 124-item FFQ | [ |
| Heme Iron | OR = 3.04 (1.20–7.72) | + | 124 esophageal, 154 stomach cancer and 449 controls | ≥21 | 100-item Short health habit and history questionnaire | [ | ||
| Gastric cancer | Heme Iron | HR = 1.13 (1.01–1.26) | + | 481,419 | 35–70 | 8.7 | Validated country specific questionnaires | [ |
| Stomach cancer | Heme Iron | OR = 1.99 (1.00–3.95) | + | 124 esophageal, 154 stomach cancer and 449 controls | ≥21 | 100-item Short health habbit and history questionnaire | [ | |
| Liver cancer | Red Meat | HR = 1.61 (1.12–2.31) | + | 567,169 | 50–71 | 8.2 | 124-item FFQ | [ |
| Pancreatic cancer | Red Meat | HRMen = 1.43 (1.11–1.83) | + | 567,169 | 50–71 | 8.2 | 124-item FFQ | [ |
| Endometrial cancer | Red Meat | HR = 0.75 (0.62–0.91) | inverse association | 567,169 | 50–71 | 8.2 | 124-item FFQ | [ |
| Heme Iron | RR = 1.24 (1.01–1.53) | moderate | 60,895 | Women born between 1914 and 1948 | 21 | 67-item FFQ in 1987 and 96-item FFQ in 1997 | [ | |
| Lung cancer | Red Meat | HRMen = 1.11 (0.79–1.56) | No Association | 99,579 | 55–74 | 8 | 124-item FFQ | [ |
| HRWomen = 1.30 (0.87–1.95) | ||||||||
| Red Meat | HR = 1.2 (1.10–1.31) | + | 567,169 | 8.2 | 124-item FFQ | [ | ||
| Red Meat | HRMen = 1.22 (1.09–1.38) | + | 278,380 men and 189,596 women | 50–71 | 8 | 124-item FFQ | [ | |
| HRWomen = 1.13 (0.97–1.32) | ||||||||
| Heme Iron | HRMen = 1.25 (1.07–1.45) | |||||||
| HRWomen = 1.18 (0.99–1.42) | ||||||||
| Type 2 Diabetes | Red Meat | RR = 1.44 (0.92–2.24) | moderate, non-significant | 91,246 U.S women | 26–46 | 8 | 133-item semiquantitative FFQ | [ |
| Red Meat | RR = 1.63 (1.26–2.10) | + | 38,394 Men | 40–75 | 12 | 131-item semiquantitative FFQ | [ | |
| Heme Iron | RR = 1.28 (1.04–1.58) | + | 35,698 postmenopausal women | 55–69 | 11 | 127-item FFQ | [ | |
| Heme Iron | RR = 1.28 (1.14–1.45) | + | 85,031 women | 34–59 | 20 | 131-item expanded FFQ | [ | |
| Gestational Diabetes Mellitus | Heme Iron | RR = 1.51 (0.99–2.36) | + | 3158 pregnant women | ≥18 | 121-item FFQ | [ | |
| Myocardial Infarction | Heme Iron | RR = 1.86 (1.14–3.09) | + | 4802 | ≥55 | 3–7 | 170-item semiquantitative FFQ | [ |
HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; +, positive association; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire.
Figure 2A cartoon illustrating a putative mechanism by which heme fuels cancer cell progression. Heme from blood can be taken up by cells via heme transporters HCP1 and HRG-1. Cancer cells have intensified internal heme synthesis as well as increased heme uptake via heme transporters, whose expression is dramatically elevated in cancer cells, compared to normal cells. As a result, the levels of an array of hemoproteins involving oxygen transport and utilization, such as cytoglobin and cytochrome c, are strongly enhanced. Enhanced levels of hemoproteins lead to intensified oxygen consumption and cellular energy generation, which in turn fuel cancer cell proliferation and migration. HCP1, heme carrier protein 1; HRG-1, heme responsive gene-1; CYP1B1, Cytochrome P450, Family 1, Subfamily B, Polypeptide 1; Cox-2, cyclooxygenase-2; CYGB, cytoglobin; Nuc, nucleus; Mito, mitochondria; Cyto, cytoplasm.