INTRODUCTION: The SARC-F scale is a newly developed tool to diagnose sarcopenia and obviate the need for measurement of muscle mass. SARC-F ≥ 4 is defined as sarcopenia. The questions of SARC-F cover physical functions targeting sarcopenia or initial presentation for sarcopenia. The aim of the study is to explore the application of SARC-F in the Chinese people. METHODS: Two hundred thirty Chinese people over 65 years old were assessed by the SARC-F scale, PSMS, Lawton IADL and the shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international(the short FES-I). Hospitalization was investigated. Physical performance and strength were measured. The association of SARC-F with other scales or tests was analyzed. RESULTS: Poor physical performance and grip strength were associated with SARC-F ≥ 4 independently (P<0.005). The κ value for agreement of SARC-F ≥ 4 and cutoff points of tests were 0.391 to 0.635. The short FES-I were correlated to SARC-F scores (Spearman's coefficient 0.692). Poor PSMS and Lawton IADL scores were associated with SARC-F ≥ 4(P=0.000) and SARC-F ≥ 4 was associated with hospitalization in the past 2 years (P=0.000). CONCLUSION: The SARC-F scale can identify old Chinese people with impaired physical function who may suffered from sarcopenia. SARC-F judgment reflects fear of falling, indicates the hospitalization events and is associated with ability of daily life. Thus, SARC-F may be a simple and useful tool for screening individuals with impaired physical function. Further studies on SARC-F in Chinese people would be worthy.
INTRODUCTION: The SARC-F scale is a newly developed tool to diagnose sarcopenia and obviate the need for measurement of muscle mass. SARC-F ≥ 4 is defined as sarcopenia. The questions of SARC-F cover physical functions targeting sarcopenia or initial presentation for sarcopenia. The aim of the study is to explore the application of SARC-F in the Chinese people. METHODS: Two hundred thirty Chinese people over 65 years old were assessed by the SARC-F scale, PSMS, Lawton IADL and the shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international(the short FES-I). Hospitalization was investigated. Physical performance and strength were measured. The association of SARC-F with other scales or tests was analyzed. RESULTS: Poor physical performance and grip strength were associated with SARC-F ≥ 4 independently (P<0.005). The κ value for agreement of SARC-F ≥ 4 and cutoff points of tests were 0.391 to 0.635. The short FES-I were correlated to SARC-F scores (Spearman's coefficient 0.692). Poor PSMS and Lawton IADL scores were associated with SARC-F ≥ 4(P=0.000) and SARC-F ≥ 4 was associated with hospitalization in the past 2 years (P=0.000). CONCLUSION: The SARC-F scale can identify old Chinese people with impaired physical function who may suffered from sarcopenia. SARC-F judgment reflects fear of falling, indicates the hospitalization events and is associated with ability of daily life. Thus, SARC-F may be a simple and useful tool for screening individuals with impaired physical function. Further studies on SARC-F in Chinese people would be worthy.
Authors: John E Morley; Angela Marie Abbatecola; Josep M Argiles; Vickie Baracos; Juergen Bauer; Shalender Bhasin; Tommy Cederholm; Andrew J Stewart Coats; Steven R Cummings; William J Evans; Kenneth Fearon; Luigi Ferrucci; Roger A Fielding; Jack M Guralnik; Tamara B Harris; Akio Inui; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Bridget-Anne Kirwan; Giovanni Mantovani; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Anne B Newman; Filippo Rossi-Fanelli; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Ronenn Roubenoff; Morris Schambelan; Gerald H Sokol; Thomas W Storer; Bruno Vellas; Stephan von Haehling; Shing-Shing Yeh; Stefan D Anker Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Jason D McKinney; Beth A Bailey; Linda H Garrett; Prith Peiris; Todd Manning; Alan N Peiris Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Bret H Goodpaster; Anne B Newman; Michael Nevitt; Elizabeth Stamm; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: G Abellan van Kan; Y Rolland; S Andrieu; J Bauer; O Beauchet; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; L M Donini; S Gillette Guyonnet; M Inzitari; F Nourhashemi; G Onder; P Ritz; A Salva; M Visser; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Lucy Yardley; Jolanda C M van Haastregt; G A Rixt Zijlstra; Nina Beyer; Klaus Hauer; Chris Todd Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Peggy Mannen Cawthon; Kathleen M Fox; Shravanthi R Gandra; Matthew J Delmonico; Chiun-Fang Chiou; Mary S Anthony; Ase Sewall; Bret Goodpaster; Suzanne Satterfield; Steven R Cummings; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: B Vellas; L Balardy; S Gillette-Guyonnet; G Abellan Van Kan; A Ghisolfi-Marque; J Subra; S Bismuth; S Oustric; M Cesari Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: William D Leslie; Lisa M Lix; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; Eugene McCloskey; John A Kanis Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: D Sánchez-Rodríguez; E Marco; V Dávalos-Yerovi; J López-Escobar; M Messaggi-Sartor; C Barrera; N Ronquillo-Moreno; O Vázquez-Ibar; A Calle; M Inzitari; K Piotrowicz; X Duran; F Escalada; J M Muniesa; E Duarte Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: B Fougère; M Cesari; H Arai; J Woo; R A Merchant; L Flicker; A Cherubini; J M Bauer; B Vellas; J E Morley Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: E Dent; J E Morley; A J Cruz-Jentoft; H Arai; S B Kritchevsky; J Guralnik; J M Bauer; M Pahor; B C Clark; M Cesari; J Ruiz; C C Sieber; M Aubertin-Leheudre; D L Waters; R Visvanathan; F Landi; D T Villareal; R Fielding; C W Won; O Theou; F C Martin; B Dong; J Woo; L Flicker; L Ferrucci; R A Merchant; L Cao; T Cederholm; S M L Ribeiro; L Rodríguez-Mañas; S D Anker; J Lundy; L M Gutiérrez Robledo; I Bautmans; I Aprahamian; J M G A Schols; M Izquierdo; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Mary P Kotlarczyk; Subashan Perera; David A Nace; Neil M Resnick; Susan L Greenspan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Samuel T H Chew; Geetha Kayambu; Charles Chin Han Lew; Tze Pin Ng; Fangyi Ong; Jonathan Tan; Ngiap Chuan Tan; Shuen-Loong Tham Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.921