OBJECTIVES: The revised European consensus on sarcopenia definition and diagnosis (EWGSOP2) includes the SARC-F questionnaire, the most valid and consistent sarcopenia screening tool, as the mandatory first step. Our aim was the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the SARC-F questionnaire as a culturally-responsive Spanish-language version for the European population. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study, applying the two-step WHO methodology for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of health questionnaires, and harmonization with the Mexican-Spanish version. European Union Geriatric Medicine Society recommendations for SARC-F validation in European languages were considered. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatient clinics of a university hospital. INCLUSION CRITERIA: stable, ambulatory (including aids), community-dwelling population ≥65 years old. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The self-reported 5-item SARC-F questionnaire was administered; scores ≥4 indicated sarcopenia. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy-likelihood ratios, predictive values, and kappa statistics were calculated and consecutively compared with European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) and EWGSOP2 criteria. RESULTS: This Spanish version, administered in an average 70s, has adequate internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.779). For the validation study, 90 (43.3%) of 208 potentially eligible subjects (81.4 ± 5.9 years old, 75.6% women) were included. SARC-F identified 51 (56.7%) subjects with sarcopenia and 39 (43.3%) without the disease. Prevalence was 17.8% per EWGSOP and 25.6% per EWGSOP2 (58% accuracy and fair agreement: sensitivity, 78.3%; specificity, 50.8%). CONCLUSIONS: SARC-F is a feasible tool, suitable for bedside assessment in community-dwelling older patients. Wide diffusion of this culturally-responsible SARC-F Spanish version is expected as EWGSOP2 is adopted and sarcopenia assessment is broadly implemented in Spain.
OBJECTIVES: The revised European consensus on sarcopenia definition and diagnosis (EWGSOP2) includes the SARC-F questionnaire, the most valid and consistent sarcopenia screening tool, as the mandatory first step. Our aim was the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the SARC-F questionnaire as a culturally-responsive Spanish-language version for the European population. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study, applying the two-step WHO methodology for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of health questionnaires, and harmonization with the Mexican-Spanish version. European Union Geriatric Medicine Society recommendations for SARC-F validation in European languages were considered. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatient clinics of a university hospital. INCLUSION CRITERIA: stable, ambulatory (including aids), community-dwelling population ≥65 years old. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The self-reported 5-item SARC-F questionnaire was administered; scores ≥4 indicated sarcopenia. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy-likelihood ratios, predictive values, and kappa statistics were calculated and consecutively compared with European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) and EWGSOP2 criteria. RESULTS: This Spanish version, administered in an average 70s, has adequate internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.779). For the validation study, 90 (43.3%) of 208 potentially eligible subjects (81.4 ± 5.9 years old, 75.6% women) were included. SARC-F identified 51 (56.7%) subjects with sarcopenia and 39 (43.3%) without the disease. Prevalence was 17.8% per EWGSOP and 25.6% per EWGSOP2 (58% accuracy and fair agreement: sensitivity, 78.3%; specificity, 50.8%). CONCLUSIONS: SARC-F is a feasible tool, suitable for bedside assessment in community-dwelling older patients. Wide diffusion of this culturally-responsible SARC-F Spanish version is expected as EWGSOP2 is adopted and sarcopenia assessment is broadly implemented in Spain.
Authors: L Cao; S Chen; C Zou; X Ding; L Gao; Z Liao; G Liu; T K Malmstrom; J E Morley; J H Flaherty; Y An; B Dong Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Marian A E van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren; Patrícia Realino Guaitoli; Elise P Jansma; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Helen C Roberts; Hayley J Denison; Helen J Martin; Harnish P Patel; Holly Syddall; Cyrus Cooper; Avan Aihie Sayer Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2011-05-30 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Roma Krzymińska-Siemaszko; Ewa Deskur-Śmielecka; Aleksandra Kaluźniak-Szymanowska; Arkadiusz Styszyński; Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: María José Pérez-Sáez; Andrea Morgado-Pérez; Anna Faura; Elena Muñoz-Redondo; Miguel Gárriz; Maria Dolors Muns; Xavier Nogués; Ester Marco; Julio Pascual Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-05-19