Literature DB >> 23452870

Selection of women aged 50-64 yr for bone density measurement.

William D Leslie1, Lisa M Lix, Helena Johansson, Anders Oden, Eugene McCloskey, John A Kanis.   

Abstract

The fracture risk assessment tool from the World Health Organization (FRAX(®)) estimates 10-yr major osteoporotic and hip fracture probabilities from multiple clinical risk factors and optionally femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). FRAX without BMD has been proposed as a method to select postmenopausal women younger than 65yr for BMD measurement, but the efficiency of this strategy and its concordance with National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) treatment guidelines is unknown. The osteoporosis self-assessment test (OST) is another simple screening tool based on age and weight alone. A historical cohort of 18,315 women aged 50-64yr, drawn from the Manitoba Bone Density Program database, which contains clinical BMD results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, was used to determine the performance of these screening tools in selecting postmenopausal women younger than 65yr for BMD testing. FRAX was closely aligned with indicators of high fracture risk (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.89), whereas OST was better for detecting women with osteoporotic BMD (AUROC: 0.72). The combination of major fracture probability 10% or higher from FRAX without BMD or OST less than 1 identified 42% of women for BMD testing, capturing 72% of women meeting any NOF treatment criteria (90% of women with NOF criteria for high risk from FRAX or prior fracture). The negative predictive value to exclude qualification for treatment under the NOF criteria was 90%. These data may help to inform an evidence-based approach for targeting BMD testing in postmenopausal women younger than 65yr under the NOF treatment guidelines.
Copyright © 2013 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; FRAX; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; fracture prediction; osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23452870     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of clinical risk assessment instruments for screening for osteoporosis or low bone density.

Authors:  S Nayak; D L Edwards; A A Saleh; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A pilot study of the SARC-F scale on screening sarcopenia and physical disability in the Chinese older people.

Authors:  L Cao; S Chen; C Zou; X Ding; L Gao; Z Liao; G Liu; T K Malmstrom; J E Morley; J H Flaherty; Y An; B Dong
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Baseline age and time to major fracture in younger postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Margaret Lee Gourlay; Robert A Overman; Jason P Fine; Kristine E Ensrud; Carolyn J Crandall; Margery L Gass; John Robbins; Karen C Johnson; Erin S LeBlanc; Catherine R Womack; John T Schousboe; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Risk Assessment Tools for Osteoporosis Screening in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Comparison of the NOF and NOGG guidelines for spinal radiographic examination in postmenopausal Chinese women.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Shuying Liu; Meng Huang; Na Ding; Qinyi Wang; Zhongjian Xie; Hong Liu; Zhifeng Sheng; Yangna Ou
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.617

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.