Literature DB >> 24625532

Stroke while on long-term left ventricular assist device support: incidence, outcome, and predictors.

Jeffrey A Morgan1, Robert J Brewer, Hassan W Nemeh, Brent Gerlach, David E Lanfear, Celeste T Williams, Gaetano Paone.   

Abstract

Development of stroke while on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support can be a source of significant morbidity and mortality. From March 2006 through November 2011, one hundred patients with chronic heart failure underwent implantation of a HeartMate II (HM II) LVAD (Thoratec Corp.) as a bridge to transplant (BTT; n = 65) or destination therapy (DT; n = 35). Records were reviewed to determine the prevalence and type of postimplant stroke, anatomic cerebral location of strokes, and associated morbidity and mortality. Cox multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of postoperative stroke. Strokes occurred in 12 patients (12.0%): four embolic and eight hemorrhagic. Median duration of support at the time of stroke was 281.0 days for embolic strokes and 380.5 days for hemorrhagic strokes (p = 0.028). Stroke patients had a significantly higher incidence of diabetes (66.7% vs. 40.9%; p = 0.024), history of preimplant stroke (16.7% vs. 4.5%; p = 0.046), and aortic cross-clamping with cardioplegic arrest during their LVAD implant (50.0% vs. 20.2%; p = 0.034) compared with patients without postoperative strokes. Mean international normalized ratio (INR) at the time of stroke was subtherapeutic in all four patients with embolic strokes (mean: 1.5 ± 0.1 IU; range 1.3-1.6 IU) and supratherapeutic in four of eight patients with hemorrhagic strokes (mean: 3.2 ± 2.2 IU, range: 1.4-7.0 IU; p = 0.024). There was a 25.0% 30 day mortality after stroke. Diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 6.36; p = 0.029), aortic cross-clamping with cardioplegic arrest (OR 4.75; p = 0.025), duration of LVAD support (OR 1.00; p = 0.008), and INR (OR 4.42; p = 0.020) were independent predictors of stroke in multivariate analysis with a trend toward significance for history of stroke (OR 6.25; p = 0.075). Stroke represented an important source of morbidity and mortality for patients on HM II LVAD support. As long-term device therapy continues to gain popularity for both BTT and DT, a better understanding of the predictors of stroke, more strict control of postoperative anticoagulation, and the establishment of a risk stratification model may aid in minimizing its occurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24625532     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  20 in total

1.  Shear stress and blood trauma under constant and pulse-modulated speed CF-VAD operations: CFD analysis of the HVAD.

Authors:  Zengsheng Chen; Sofen K Jena; Guruprasad A Giridharan; Michael A Sobieski; Steven C Koenig; Mark S Slaughter; Bartley P Griffith; Zhongjun J Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Does cognition improve following LVAD implantation?

Authors:  Marykay A Pavol; Joshua Z Willey; Ying Wei; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Randolph S Marshall; Philip J Marascalco; Jason Harwood; Ronald M Lazar
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  Outcomes after stroke complicating left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Joshua Z Willey; Michael V Gavalas; Pauline N Trinh; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; A Reshad Garan; Allison P Levin; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Justin Fried; Yoshifumi Naka; Veli K Topkara; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Configurations Impact Overall Mechanical Circulatory Support System Thrombogenic Potential.

Authors:  Wei-Che Chiu; Yared Alemu; Allison J McLarty; Shmuel Einav; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Impact of time in therapeutic range after left ventricular assist device placement: a comparison between thrombus and thrombus-free periods.

Authors:  Julia C Lea; Catherine K Floroff; Amanda I Ingemi; Gary R Zeevi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Current status of the implantable LVAD.

Authors:  Sagar Kadakia; Ryan Moore; Vishnu Ambur; Yoshiya Toyoda
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-06

7.  Impact of LVAD Implantation Site on Ventricular Blood Stagnation.

Authors:  Anthony R Prisco; Alberto Aliseda; Jennifer A Beckman; Nahush A Mokadam; Claudius Mahr; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Assessing Cerebrovascular Hemodynamics Using Transcranial Doppler in Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.

Authors:  Kara R Melmed; Konrad H Schlick; Brenda Rinsky; Oana M Dumitrascu; Oksana Volod; Mani Nezhad; Matthew M Padrick; Carmelita Runyan; Francisco A Arabia; Jaime D Moriguchi; Patrick D Lyden; Shlee S Song
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Relationship Between Anticoagulation Intensity and Thrombotic or Bleeding Outcomes Among Outpatients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Michael E Nassif; Shane J LaRue; David S Raymer; Eric Novak; Justin M Vader; Gregory A Ewald; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 10.  Hypertension and Stroke in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs).

Authors:  Joshua Z Willey; Amelia K Boehme; Francesco Castagna; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; A Reshad Garan; Veli Topkara; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.