Literature DB >> 27922885

Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Configurations Impact Overall Mechanical Circulatory Support System Thrombogenic Potential.

Wei-Che Chiu1, Yared Alemu, Allison J McLarty, Shmuel Einav, Marvin J Slepian, Danny Bluestein.   

Abstract

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) became in recent years the standard of care therapy for advanced heart failure with hemodynamic compromise. With the steadily growing population of device recipients, various postimplant complications have been reported, mostly associated with the hypershear generated by VADs that enhance their thrombogenicity by activating platelets. Although VAD design optimization can significantly improve its thromboresistance, the implanted VAD need to be evaluated as part of a system. Several clinical studies indicated that variability in implantation configurations may contribute to the overall system thrombogenicity. Numerical simulations were conducted in the HeartAssist 5 (HA5) and HeartMate II (HMII) VADs in the following implantation configurations: 1) inflow cannula angles: 115° and 140° (HA5); 2) three VAD circumferential orientations: 0°, 30°, and 60° (HA5 and HMII); and 3) 60° and 90° outflow graft anastomotic angles with respect to the ascending aorta (HA5). The stress accumulation of the platelets was calculated along flow trajectories and collapsed into a probability density function, representing the "thrombogenic footprint" of each configuration-a proxy to its thrombogenic potential (TP). The 140° HA5 cannula generated lower TP independent of the circumferential orientation of the VAD. Sixty-degree orientation generated the lowest TP for the HA5 versus 0° for the HMII. An anastomotic angle of 60° resulted in lower TP for HA5. These results demonstrate that optimizing the implantation configuration reduces the overall system TP. Thromboresistance can be enhanced by combining VAD design optimization with the surgical implantation configurations for achieving better clinical outcomes of implanted VADs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27922885      PMCID: PMC5411323          DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  38 in total

1.  Effect of LVAD outflow conduit insertion angle on flow through the native aorta.

Authors:  K D May-Newman; B K Hillen; C S Sironda; W Dembitsky
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2004 May-Jun

Review 2.  Bleeding and thrombosis in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Peter M Eckman; Ranjit John
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Antithrombotic therapy for left ventricular assist devices in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  L M Baumann Kreuziger; B Kim; G M Wieselthaler
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.824

5.  Thromboresistance comparison of the HeartMate II ventricular assist device with the device thrombogenicity emulation- optimized HeartAssist 5 VAD.

Authors:  Wei-Che Chiu; Gaurav Girdhar; Michalis Xenos; Yared Alemu; Jõao S Soares; Shmuel Einav; Marvin Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Stroke After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Outcomes in the Continuous-Flow Era.

Authors:  Laura Harvey; Christopher Holley; Samit S Roy; Peter Eckman; Rebecca Cogswell; Kenneth Liao; Ranjit John
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Unexpected abrupt increase in left ventricular assist device thrombosis.

Authors:  Randall C Starling; Nader Moazami; Scott C Silvestry; Gregory Ewald; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; J Eduardo Rame; Michael A Acker; Eugene H Blackstone; John Ehrlinger; Lucy Thuita; Maria M Mountis; Edward G Soltesz; Bruce W Lytle; Nicholas G Smedira
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Stroke while on long-term left ventricular assist device support: incidence, outcome, and predictors.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Morgan; Robert J Brewer; Hassan W Nemeh; Brent Gerlach; David E Lanfear; Celeste T Williams; Gaetano Paone
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  Design and numeric evaluation of a novel axial-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Koral Toptop; Kamuran A Kadipasaoglu
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the Heartmate II left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Ranjit John; Forum Kamdar; Kenneth Liao; Monica Colvin-Adams; Leslie Miller; Lyle Joyce; Andrew Boyle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prothrombotic activity of cytokine-activated endothelial cells and shear-activated platelets in the setting of ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Alice Apostoli; Valentina Bianchi; Nina Bono; Annalisa Dimasi; Kaitlyn R Ammann; Yana Roka Moiia; Andrea Montisci; Jawaad Sheriff; Danny Bluestein; Gianfranco B Fiore; Federico Pappalardo; Gabriele Candiani; Alberto Redaelli; Marvin J Slepian; Filippo Consolo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 2.  Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing.

Authors:  Oren M Rotman; Matteo Bianchi; Ram P Ghosh; Brandon Kovarovic; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  Device Thrombogenicity Emulation: An In Silico Predictor of In Vitro and In Vivo Ventricular Assist Device Thrombogenicity.

Authors:  Wei Che Chiu; Phat L Tran; Zain Khalpey; Eric Lee; Yi-Ren Woo; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.