Literature DB >> 24623024

Intensive versus intermediate glucose control in surgical intensive care unit patients.

Takehiro Okabayashi1, Yasuo Shima2, Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi2, Akihito Kozuki2, Teppei Tokumaru2, Tasuo Iiyama3, Takeki Sugimoto4, Michiya Kobayashi4, Masataka Yokoyama5, Kazuhiro Hanazaki4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The optimal perioperative blood glucose range to improve surgical site infection (SSI) in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients remains unclear. We sought to determine whether the incidence of SSI is reduced by perioperative intensive insulin therapy (IT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive perioperative intensive IT, with a target blood glucose range of 4.4-6.1 mmol/L, or intermediate IT, with a target blood glucose range of 7.7-10.0 mmol/L in the surgical ICU. We defined the primary end point as the incidence of SSI.
RESULTS: Study participants were randomly assigned to glucose control with one of two target ranges: for 225 patients in the intermediate IT group or for 222 patients in the intensive IT group, respectively. No patients in either group became hypoglycemic (<4.4 mmol/L) during their stay in the surgical ICU. In our series, the rate of SSI after hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery was 6.7%. Patients in the intensive IT group, compared with the intermediate IT group, had fewer postoperative SSIs (9.8% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.028) and a lower incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic resection (P = 0.040). The length of hospitalization required for patients in the intensive IT group was significantly shorter than that in the intermediate IT group (P = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that intensive IT decreased the incidence of SSI among patients who underwent hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: a blood glucose target of 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L resulted in lower rate of SSI than did a target of 7.7-10.0 mmol/L.
© 2014 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623024     DOI: 10.2337/dc13-1771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  32 in total

1.  Comparative Simulation Study of Glucose Control Methods Designed for Use in the Intensive Care Unit Setting via a Novel Controller Scoring Metric.

Authors:  Jeremy DeJournett; Leon DeJournett
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-22

2.  Insulin-Treated Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery Have Worse Outcomes than Patients Treated with Oral Agents.

Authors:  Tobias Haltmeier; Elizabeth Benjamin; Elizabeth Beale; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  In Silico Testing of an Artificial-Intelligence-Based Artificial Pancreas Designed for Use in the Intensive Care Unit Setting.

Authors:  Leon DeJournett; Jeremy DeJournett
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Glycemic Control Reduces Infections in Post-Liver Transplant Patients: Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Amisha Wallia; Kathleen Schmidt; Diana Johnson Oakes; Teresa Pollack; Nicholas Welsh; Susan Kling-Colson; Suruchi Gupta; Candice Fulkerson; Grazia Aleppo; Neehar Parikh; Josh Levitsky; J P Norvell; Alfred Rademaker; Mark E Molitch
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Debate on Insulin vs Non-insulin Use in the Hospital Setting-Is It Time to Revise the Guidelines for the Management of Inpatient Diabetes?

Authors:  Francisco J Pasquel; Maya Fayfman; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Correlation between the skeletal muscle index and surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Kenta Sui; Takehiro Okabayshi; Jun Iwata; Sojiro Morita; Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi; Tatsuo Iiyama; Yasuhiro Shimada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Advancing the Use of CGM Devices in a Non-ICU Setting.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Lakshmi G Singh; Elias K Spanakis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-13

Review 8.  Glucose Control in the ICU: A Continuing Story.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Preiser; J Geoffrey Chase; Roman Hovorka; Jeffrey I Joseph; James S Krinsley; Christophe De Block; Thomas Desaive; Luc Foubert; Pierre Kalfon; Ulrike Pielmeier; Tom Van Herpe; Jan Wernerman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 9.  Hypoglycemia Reduction Strategies in the ICU.

Authors:  Susan Shapiro Braithwaite; Dharmesh B Bavda; Thaer Idrees; Faisal Qureshi; Oluwakemi T Soetan
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Galindo; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; Ananda Basu; Suzanne Lohnes; James H Nichols; Elias K Spanakis; Juan Espinoza; Nadine E Palermo; Dessa Garnett Awadjie; Leigh Bak; Bruce Buckingham; Curtiss B Cook; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann; Roman Hovorka; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Tonya Newman; David N O'Neal; Michaela Rickert; David B Sacks; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Amisha Wallia; Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Julia Han; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.