Literature DB >> 27875061

Glycemic Control Reduces Infections in Post-Liver Transplant Patients: Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study.

Amisha Wallia1, Kathleen Schmidt1, Diana Johnson Oakes1, Teresa Pollack1, Nicholas Welsh1, Susan Kling-Colson1, Suruchi Gupta1, Candice Fulkerson1, Grazia Aleppo1, Neehar Parikh2, Josh Levitsky2, J P Norvell2, Alfred Rademaker3, Mark E Molitch1.   

Abstract

Context: Previous studies have shown a relationship between glycemic control and posttransplant morbidity. Objective: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in postliver transplant patients to evaluate intensive inpatient glycemic control and effects on outcomes to 1 year. Research Design and Intervention: A total of 164 patients [blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL] were randomized into 2 target groups: 82 with a BG of 140 mg/dL and 82 with a BG of 180 mg/dL. Continuous insulin infusions were initiated and then converted to subcutaneous basal bolus insulin therapy by our glucose management service.
Results: The inpatient mean BG level was significantly different (140 group, 151.4 ± 19.5 mg/dL vs 180 group, 172.6 ± 27.9 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Any infection within 1 year occurred in 35 of the 82 patients (42.7%) in the 140 group and 54 of 82 (65.9%) in the 180 group (P = 0.0046). In a time-to-first infection analysis, being in the 140 group resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.83; P = 0.004); the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant at 1 month (P = 0.008). The number with adjudicated transplant rejection was similar between the 2 groups [17 of 82 (20.7%) and 20 of 82 (24.3%) in the 140 and 180 groups, respectively; P = not significant]. Severe hypoglycemia (BG ≤40 mg/dL) occurred in 3 patients (2 in the 140 group and 1 in the 180 group). However, more patients had moderate hypoglycemia (BG, 41 to 70 mg/dL) in the 140 group [27 of 82 (32.9%) vs 10 of 82 (12.2%) in the 180 group; P = 0.003]. Insulin-related hypoglycemia was not associated with the incidence of severe adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Glycemic control of 140 mg/dL safely resulted in a reduced incidence of infection after transplantation compared with 180 mg/dL, but with an increase in moderate hypoglycemia.
Copyright © 2017 by the Endocrine Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27875061      PMCID: PMC6283442          DOI: 10.1210/jc.2016-3279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  40 in total

Review 1.  Stress hyperglycemia and prognosis of stroke in nondiabetic and diabetic patients: a systematic overview.

Authors:  S E Capes; D Hunt; K Malmberg; P Pathak; H C Gerstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Statistical power calculations.

Authors:  R V Lenth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  The effectiveness of tight glycemic control on decreasing surgical site infections and readmission rates in adult patients with diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lyn Boreland; Marcia Scott-Hudson; Kathy Hetherington; Antoinette Frussinetty; Jason T Slyer
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Plasma glucose at hospital admission and previous metabolic control determine myocardial infarct size and survival in patients with and without type 2 diabetes: the Langendreer Myocardial Infarction and Blood Glucose in Diabetic Patients Assessment (LAMBDA).

Authors:  Juris J Meier; Silvia Deifuss; Andreas Klamann; Volker Launhardt; Wolff H Schmiegel; Michael A Nauck
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  The relation between hyperglycemia and outcomes in 2,471 patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Sumit R Majumdar; Sandra Blitz; Brian H Rowe; Jacques Romney; Thomas J Marrie
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of glycemic control on renal transplantation outcomes.

Authors:  Kathie L Hermayer; Maria F Egidi; Nancy J Finch; Prabhakar Baliga; Angello Lin; Lindsey Kettinger; Shari Biggins; Rickey E Carter
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Tight glycemic control in diabetic coronary artery bypass graft patients improves perioperative outcomes and decreases recurrent ischemic events.

Authors:  Harold L Lazar; Stuart R Chipkin; Carmel A Fitzgerald; Yusheng Bao; Howard Cabral; Carl S Apstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effect of an intensive glucose management protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients.

Authors:  James Stephen Krinsley
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Intensive versus intermediate glucose control in surgical intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Takehiro Okabayashi; Yasuo Shima; Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi; Akihito Kozuki; Teppei Tokumaru; Tasuo Iiyama; Takeki Sugimoto; Michiya Kobayashi; Masataka Yokoyama; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Versus Conservative Glucose Control in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: GLUCO-CABG Trial.

Authors:  Guillermo Umpierrez; Saumeth Cardona; Francisco Pasquel; Sol Jacobs; Limin Peng; Michael Unigwe; Christopher A Newton; Dawn Smiley-Byrd; Priyathama Vellanki; Michael Halkos; John D Puskas; Robert A Guyton; Vinod H Thourani
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Use of Insulin in the Inpatient Setting: Need for Continued Use.

Authors:  Smita Kumar; Mark E Molitch
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Perioperative diabetes care.

Authors:  Ketan Dhatariya; Nicholas Levy
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  The clinical implications of pre-liver transplant diabetes on post-liver transplant outcomes in patients with NASH: analysis of the UNOS database.

Authors:  David Uihwan Lee; John Han; Ki Jung Lee; Jean Kwon; Gregory Hongyuan Fan; Daniel Jung; Nathalie H Urrunaga
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 9.029

Review 4.  Updates in Glycemic Management in the Hospital.

Authors:  Wasineenart Mongkolpun; Bruna Provenzano; Jean-Charles Preiser
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 5.  Diabetes Mellitus Following Renal Transplantation: Clinical and Pharmacological Considerations for the Elderly Patient.

Authors:  David Langsford; Adam Steinberg; Karen M Dwyer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.271

6.  Hyperglycemia in the Posttransplant Period: NODAT vs Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Suruchi Gupta; Teresa Pollack; Candice Fulkerson; Kathleen Schmidt; Diana Johnson Oakes; Mark E Molitch; Amisha Wallia
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2018-10-15

7.  Development of a Predictive Model for Hyperglycemia in Nondiabetic Recipients After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Henry Zelada; Lisa B VanWagner; Teresa Pollack; Devan Higginbotham; Lihui Zhao; Amy Yang; Mark E Molitch; Amisha Wallia
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 8.  Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Wang; Shuang-Fei Hu; Hui-Min Ying; Long Chen; Hui-Li Li; Fang Tian; Zhen-Feng Zhou
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.763

9.  Risk assessment of the hospital discharge process of high-risk patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Teresa A Pollack; Vidhya Illuri; Rebeca Khorzad; Grazia Aleppo; Diana Johnson Oakes; Jane L Holl; Amisha Wallia
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2018-05-16

Review 10.  Post-Liver Transplantation Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Relevance and Approach to Treatment.

Authors:  Maria J Peláez-Jaramillo; Allison A Cárdenas-Mojica; Paula V Gaete; Carlos O Mendivil
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.945

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.