Context: Previous studies have shown a relationship between glycemic control and posttransplant morbidity. Objective: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in postliver transplant patients to evaluate intensive inpatient glycemic control and effects on outcomes to 1 year. Research Design and Intervention: A total of 164 patients [blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL] were randomized into 2 target groups: 82 with a BG of 140 mg/dL and 82 with a BG of 180 mg/dL. Continuous insulin infusions were initiated and then converted to subcutaneous basal bolus insulin therapy by our glucose management service. Results: The inpatient mean BG level was significantly different (140 group, 151.4 ± 19.5 mg/dLvs 180 group, 172.6 ± 27.9 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Any infection within 1 year occurred in 35 of the 82 patients (42.7%) in the 140 group and 54 of 82 (65.9%) in the 180 group (P = 0.0046). In a time-to-first infection analysis, being in the 140 group resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.83; P = 0.004); the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant at 1 month (P = 0.008). The number with adjudicated transplant rejection was similar between the 2 groups [17 of 82 (20.7%) and 20 of 82 (24.3%) in the 140 and 180 groups, respectively; P = not significant]. Severe hypoglycemia (BG ≤40 mg/dL) occurred in 3 patients (2 in the 140 group and 1 in the 180 group). However, more patients had moderate hypoglycemia (BG, 41 to 70 mg/dL) in the 140 group [27 of 82 (32.9%) vs 10 of 82 (12.2%) in the 180 group; P = 0.003]. Insulin-related hypoglycemia was not associated with the incidence of severe adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Glycemic control of 140 mg/dL safely resulted in a reduced incidence of infection after transplantation compared with 180 mg/dL, but with an increase in moderate hypoglycemia.
RCT Entities:
Context: Previous studies have shown a relationship between glycemic control and posttransplant morbidity. Objective: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in postliver transplant patients to evaluate intensive inpatient glycemic control and effects on outcomes to 1 year. Research Design and Intervention: A total of 164 patients [blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL] were randomized into 2 target groups: 82 with a BG of 140 mg/dL and 82 with a BG of 180 mg/dL. Continuous insulin infusions were initiated and then converted to subcutaneous basal bolus insulin therapy by our glucose management service. Results: The inpatient mean BG level was significantly different (140 group, 151.4 ± 19.5 mg/dL vs 180 group, 172.6 ± 27.9 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Any infection within 1 year occurred in 35 of the 82 patients (42.7%) in the 140 group and 54 of 82 (65.9%) in the 180 group (P = 0.0046). In a time-to-first infection analysis, being in the 140 group resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.83; P = 0.004); the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant at 1 month (P = 0.008). The number with adjudicated transplant rejection was similar between the 2 groups [17 of 82 (20.7%) and 20 of 82 (24.3%) in the 140 and 180 groups, respectively; P = not significant]. Severe hypoglycemia (BG ≤40 mg/dL) occurred in 3 patients (2 in the 140 group and 1 in the 180 group). However, more patients had moderate hypoglycemia (BG, 41 to 70 mg/dL) in the 140 group [27 of 82 (32.9%) vs 10 of 82 (12.2%) in the 180 group; P = 0.003]. Insulin-related hypoglycemia was not associated with the incidence of severe adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Glycemic control of 140 mg/dL safely resulted in a reduced incidence of infection after transplantation compared with 180 mg/dL, but with an increase in moderate hypoglycemia.
Authors: Juris J Meier; Silvia Deifuss; Andreas Klamann; Volker Launhardt; Wolff H Schmiegel; Michael A Nauck Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Finlay A McAlister; Sumit R Majumdar; Sandra Blitz; Brian H Rowe; Jacques Romney; Thomas J Marrie Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Harold L Lazar; Stuart R Chipkin; Carmel A Fitzgerald; Yusheng Bao; Howard Cabral; Carl S Apstein Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-03-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Guillermo Umpierrez; Saumeth Cardona; Francisco Pasquel; Sol Jacobs; Limin Peng; Michael Unigwe; Christopher A Newton; Dawn Smiley-Byrd; Priyathama Vellanki; Michael Halkos; John D Puskas; Robert A Guyton; Vinod H Thourani Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: David Uihwan Lee; John Han; Ki Jung Lee; Jean Kwon; Gregory Hongyuan Fan; Daniel Jung; Nathalie H Urrunaga Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2022-09-11 Impact factor: 9.029
Authors: Henry Zelada; Lisa B VanWagner; Teresa Pollack; Devan Higginbotham; Lihui Zhao; Amy Yang; Mark E Molitch; Amisha Wallia Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2018-09-20
Authors: Teresa A Pollack; Vidhya Illuri; Rebeca Khorzad; Grazia Aleppo; Diana Johnson Oakes; Jane L Holl; Amisha Wallia Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2018-05-16
Authors: Maria J Peláez-Jaramillo; Allison A Cárdenas-Mojica; Paula V Gaete; Carlos O Mendivil Journal: Diabetes Ther Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 2.945