Literature DB >> 27301982

In Silico Testing of an Artificial-Intelligence-Based Artificial Pancreas Designed for Use in the Intensive Care Unit Setting.

Leon DeJournett1, Jeremy DeJournett2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective glucose control in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting has the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality rates which should in turn lead to decreased health care expenditures. Current ICU-based glucose controllers are mathematically derived, and tend to be based on proportional integral derivative (PID) or model predictive control (MPC). Artificial intelligence (AI)-based closed loop glucose controllers may have the ability to achieve control that improves on the results achieved by either PID or MPC controllers.
METHOD: We conducted an in silico analysis of an AI-based glucose controller designed for use in the ICU setting. This controller was tested using a mathematical model of the ICU patient's glucose-insulin system. A total of 126 000 unique 5-day simulations were carried out, resulting in 107 million glucose values for analysis.
RESULTS: For the 7 control ranges tested, with a sensor error of ±10%, the following average results were achieved: (1) time in control range, 94.2%, (2) time in range 70-140 mg/dl, 97.8%, (3) time in hyperglycemic range (>140 mg/dl), 2.1%, and (4) time in hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dl), 0.09%. In addition, the average coefficient of variation (CV) was 11.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: This in silico study of an AI-based closed loop glucose controller shows that it may be able to improve on the results achieved by currently existing ICU-based PID/MPC controllers. If these results are confirmed in clinical testing, this AI-based controller could be used to create an artificial pancreas system for use in the ICU setting.
© 2016 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; closed loop control; cost savings; glucose; intensive care unit; knowledge-based system

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27301982      PMCID: PMC5094333          DOI: 10.1177/1932296816653967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  39 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of hospital costs and length of stay by good control of blood glucose levels.

Authors:  Andrew Ahmann
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Glycemia prediction in critically ill patients using an adaptive modeling approach.

Authors:  Tom Van Herpe; Marcelo Espinoza; Niels Haverbeke; Bart De Moor; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-05

3.  Evaluation of a continuous blood glucose monitoring system using central venous microdialysis.

Authors:  Fanny Schierenbeck; Anders Franco-Cereceda; Jan Liska
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

4.  Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures.

Authors:  A P Furnary; K J Zerr; G L Grunkemeier; A Starr
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Automatic learning algorithm for the MD-logic artificial pancreas system.

Authors:  Shahar Miller; Revital Nimri; Eran Atlas; Eli A Grunberg; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Natural occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia detection using hybrid particle swarm optimized fuzzy reasoning model.

Authors:  Sai Ho Ling; Hung T Nguyen
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Management of hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure.

Authors:  Ch Sampanis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.471

8.  The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator: New Features.

Authors:  Chiara Dalla Man; Francesco Micheletto; Dayu Lv; Marc Breton; Boris Kovatchev; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

9.  Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Daniel C Wiener; Robin J Larson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Variability of insulin sensitivity during the first 4 days of critical illness: implications for tight glycemic control.

Authors:  Christopher G Pretty; Aaron J Le Compte; J Geoffrey Chase; Geoffrey M Shaw; Jean-Charles Preiser; Sophie Penning; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparative Simulation Study of Glucose Control Methods Designed for Use in the Intensive Care Unit Setting via a Novel Controller Scoring Metric.

Authors:  Jeremy DeJournett; Leon DeJournett
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 2.  Intelligent automated drug administration and therapy: future of healthcare.

Authors:  Richa Sharma; Dhirendra Singh; Prerna Gaur; Deepak Joshi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 3.  Managing hyperglycemia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Improving outcomes using new technologies in intensive care.

Authors:  Timothy Valk; Carol McMorrow
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-11-19

4.  Distributed Intelligent Learning and Decision Model Based on Logic Predictive Control.

Authors:  Yucheng Zhou; Wen Lu; Yingqiu Zhang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-30

5.  Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: Today, Tomorrow and User Requirements.

Authors:  Marga Giménez; Ignacio Conget; Nick Oliver
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-22

Review 6.  Diabetes Technology Update: Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital.

Authors:  Guillermo E Umpierrez; David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 19.112

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.