Literature DB >> 24621838

Mechanical circulatory support for right ventricular failure.

Navin K Kapur1, Vikram Paruchuri2, Anand Jagannathan2, Daniel Steinberg3, Anjan K Chakrabarti4, Duane Pinto4, Nima Aghili5, Samer Najjar5, John Finley6, Nicole M Orr7, Michael Tempelhof8, James O Mudd9, Michael S Kiernan2, Duc Thinh Pham2, David DeNofrio2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical utility of a commercially available centrifugal flow pump as a centrifugal flow-right ventricular support device (CF-RVSD) in patients with right ventricular failure (RVF).
BACKGROUND: RVF is associated with high in-hospital mortality. Limited data regarding efficacy of the CF-RVSD for RVF exist.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 46 patients receiving a CF-RVSD for RVF from a registry comprising data from 8 tertiary-care hospitals in the United States. CF-RVSD use was recorded in the setting of acute myocardial infarction; myocarditis; chronic left heart failure; after valve surgery, orthotopic heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device surgery, coronary bypass grafting. Devices were implanted via the percutaneous (n = 22) or surgical (n = 24) route.
RESULTS: No intraprocedural mortality was observed. Mean time from admission to CF-RVSD implantation was 5.7 ± 8.5 days, with a mean of 6,769 ± 789 rotations/min, providing 4.2 ± 1.3 l/min of flow. Mean duration of support was 5.4 ± 5.1 days. Mean arterial pressure (65 ± 12 mm Hg vs. 73 ± 14 mm Hg; p < 0.05), right atrial pressure (21 ± 8 mm Hg vs. 16 ± 7 mm Hg; p = 0.05), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (43 ± 15 mm Hg vs. 33 ± 15 mm Hg; p = 0.01), and cardiac index (1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6; p = 0.01) were improved within 48 h of CF-RVSD implantation. Total in-hospital mortality was 57% and was lowest in the setting of left ventricular assist device implantation, chronic left heart failure, and acute myocardial infarction. Increased age, biventricular failure, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-defined major bleeding were associated with increased in-hospital mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the CF-RVSD for RVF is clinically feasible and associated with improved hemodynamic status. Observations from the registry of patients who have received this device may support the development of prospective studies that will examine the role of percutaneous circulatory support for RVF.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  invasive hemodynamics; mechanical circulatory support; right heart failure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24621838     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2213-1779            Impact factor:   12.035


  23 in total

Review 1.  Management of refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Alex Reyentovich; Maya H Barghash; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditya Mandawat; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kevin J Morine; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-01

Review 4.  Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kartik S Telukuntla; Jerry D Estep
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Emerging therapies for right ventricular dysfunction and failure.

Authors:  Anna Klinke; Torben Schubert; Marion Müller; Ekaterina Legchenko; Jason G E Zelt; Tsukasa Shimauchi; L Christian Napp; Alexander M K Rothman; Sébastien Bonnet; Duncan J Stewart; Georg Hansmann; Volker Rudolph
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-10

Review 6.  'Combat' Approach to Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Alexander G Truesdell; Behnam Tehrani; Ramesh Singh; Shashank Desai; Patricia Saulino; Scott Barnett; Stephen Lavanier; Charles Murphy
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

Review 7.  Myocardial ischemia and coronary disease in heart failure.

Authors:  Beniamino R Pagliaro; Francesco Cannata; Giulio G Stefanini; Leonardo Bolognese
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  Transplantation in end-stage pulmonary hypertension (Third International Right Heart Failure Summit, part 3).

Authors:  Anuradha Lala
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.017

9.  Comprehensive Monitoring in Patients with Dual Lumen Right Atrium to Pulmonary Artery Right Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Asad A Usman; Audrey E Spelde; Michael Ibrahim; Marisa Cevasco; Christian Bermudez; Emily MacKay; Sameer Khandhar; Wilson Szeto; William Vernick; Jacob Gutsche
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.826

Review 10.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Right Heart Failure in Pulmonary Vascular Diseases: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop.

Authors:  Jane A Leopold; Steven M Kawut; Micheala A Aldred; Stephen L Archer; Ray L Benza; Michael R Bristow; Evan L Brittain; Naomi Chesler; Frances S DeMan; Serpil C Erzurum; Mark T Gladwin; Paul M Hassoun; Anna R Hemnes; Tim Lahm; Joao A C Lima; Joseph Loscalzo; Bradley A Maron; Laura Mercer Rosa; John H Newman; Susan Redline; Stuart Rich; Franz Rischard; Lissa Sugeng; W H Wilson Tang; Ryan J Tedford; Emily J Tsai; Corey E Ventetuolo; YouYang Zhou; Neil R Aggarwal; Lei Xiao
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 10.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.