| Literature DB >> 32280415 |
Kartik S Telukuntla1, Jerry D Estep1.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and clinicians have increasingly used short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) over the last 15 years to manage outcomes. In general, the provision of greater hemodynamic support comes with device platforms that are more complex and potentially associated with more adverse events. In this review, we compare and contrast the available percutaneous and surgically placed device types used in cardiogenic shock and discuss the associated clinical and hemodynamic data to support device use.Entities:
Keywords: CentriMag; ECMO; Impella; TandemHeart; cardiogenic shock; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; intra-aortic balloon pump; mechanical circulatory support
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32280415 PMCID: PMC7137625 DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J ISSN: 1947-6108