Literature DB >> 24619638

Validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index as a tool to evaluate the learning curve for endoscopy training.

Rachid Mohamed, Maitreyi Raman, John Anderson, Kevin McLaughlin, Alaa Rostom, Sylvain Coderre.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although workplace workload assessments exist in different fields, an endoscopy-specific workload assessment tool is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To validate such a workload tool and use it to map the progression of novice trainees in gastroenterology in performing their first endoscopies.
METHODS: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) workload assessment tool was completed by eight novice trainees in gastroenterology and 10 practicing gastroenterologists⁄surgeons. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to construct a streamlined endoscopy-specific task load index, which was subsequently validated. The 'Endoscopy Task Load Index' was used to monitor progression of trainee exertion and self-assessed performance over their first 40 procedures.
RESULTS: From the factor analysis of the NASA-TLX, two principal components emerged: a measure of exertion and a measure of self-efficacy. These items became the components of the newly validated Endoscopy Task Load Index. There was a steady decline in self-perceived exertion over the training period, which was more rapid for gastroscopy than colonoscopy. The self-efficacy scores for gastroscopy rapidly increased over the first few procedures, reaching a plateau after this period of time. For colonoscopy, there was a progressive increase in reported self-efficacy over the first three quartiles of procedures, followed by a drop in self-efficacy scores over the final quartile. DISCUSSION: The present study validated an Endoscopy Task Load Index that can be completed in <1 min. Practical implications of such a tool in endoscopy education include identifying periods of higher perceived exertion among novice endoscopists, facilitating appropriate levels of guidance from trainers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24619638      PMCID: PMC4071878          DOI: 10.1155/2014/892476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2291-2789


  21 in total

1.  Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack; Joseph C Kolars
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Early use of magnetic endoscopic imaging by novice colonoscopists: improved performance without increase in workload.

Authors:  Sylvain Coderre; John Anderson; Remy Rikers; Paul Dunckley; Karen Holbrook; Kevin McLaughlin
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Assessment of endoscopic training of general surgery residents in a North American health region.

Authors:  Samuel Asfaha; Saleh Alqahtani; Robert J Hilsden; Anthony R MacLean; Paul L Beck
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Procedural skills education--colonoscopy as a model.

Authors:  Maitreyi Raman; Tyrone Donnon
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Predictors of technical skill acquisition among resident trainees in a laparoscopic skills education program.

Authors:  Corey Van Hove; Kyle A Perry; Donn H Spight; Krissy Wheeler-Mcinvaille; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; Blair A Jobe; Robert W O'Rourke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Fellow perceptions of training using computer-based endoscopy simulators.

Authors:  Jenifer R Lightdale; Adrienne R Newburg; Lisa B Mahoney; Meghan E Fredette; Laurie N Fishman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training.

Authors:  Adam Haycock; Arjun D Koch; Pietro Familiari; Foke van Delft; Evelien Dekker; Lucio Petruzziello; Jelle Haringsma; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Jin-Oh Kim; Bong-Min Ko; Young Hwangbo; Won Ho Kim; Dong Hun Park; Sang Kil Lee; Cheol Hee Park; Il-Hyun Baek; Dong Il Park; Seun-Ja Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Byung-Ik Jang; Yoon-Tae Jeen; Jeong Eun Shin; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chang-Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Assessment of workload using NASA Task Load Index in perianesthesia nursing.

Authors:  Gloria Young; Lyubov Zavelina; Vallire Hooper
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.084

10.  Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence.

Authors:  Bret J Spier; Mark Benson; Patrick R Pfau; Gregory Nelligan; Michael R Lucey; Eric A Gaumnitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  8 in total

1.  The impact of crosstalk on three-dimensional laparoscopic performance and workload.

Authors:  Shinichiro Sakata; Philip M Grove; Marcus O Watson; Andrew R L Stevenson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  EUS-guided intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with direct portal pressure measurements: a novel alternative to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting.

Authors:  Allison R Schulman; Marvin Ryou; Hiro Aihara; Wasif Abidi; Austin Chiang; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Ayman Sakr; Eduarda Ajeje; Michele B Ryan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A novel gaze-controlled flexible robotized endoscope; preliminary trial and report.

Authors:  Arun Sivananthan; Alexandros Kogkas; Ben Glover; Ara Darzi; George Mylonas; Nisha Patel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Electromagnetic image guidance in gynecology: prospective study of a new laparoscopic imaging and targeting technique for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Donald I Galen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Impact of simulated three-dimensional perception on precision of depth judgements, technical performance and perceived workload in laparoscopy.

Authors:  S Sakata; P M Grove; A Hill; M O Watson; A R L Stevenson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Effectiveness of simulation-based training for obstetric internal medicine: Impact of cognitive load and emotions on knowledge acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kelle D Hurd; Meghan Eo Vlasschaert; T Lee Ann Hawkins; Jolene Haws; Julia N Kupis; Irene Wy Ma
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2021-05-12

7.  Subjective workload measurement of the transition from a conventional operative microscope to a Robotic Digital Microscope. A pilot study.

Authors:  N Gabrovsky; M Petrov; P Ilkov; I Iordanova; N Velinov
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-08-19

8.  Development and validation of a porcine organ model for training in essential laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Madoka Higuchi; Takashige Abe; Kiyohiko Hotta; Ken Morita; Haruka Miyata; Jun Furumido; Naoya Iwahara; Masafumi Kon; Takahiro Osawa; Ryuji Matsumoto; Hiroshi Kikuchi; Yo Kurashima; Sachiyo Murai; Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Kamran Ahmed; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.369

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.