Literature DB >> 18640675

Assessment of endoscopic training of general surgery residents in a North American health region.

Samuel Asfaha1, Saleh Alqahtani, Robert J Hilsden, Anthony R MacLean, Paul L Beck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ensuring competency of trainees is a challenge for residency programs. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommends that a minimum of 130 EGDs and 140 colonoscopies be performed to assess competency.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the number of endoscopies performed by surgery and gastroenterology residents during their training. Endoscopy patterns were also assessed for staff gastroenterology specialists and general surgeons in Alberta, Canada.
DESIGN: Physician billing data were used to determine endoscopic practice patterns, and the number of endoscopies performed by gastroenterology fellows and surgery residents were obtained.
SETTING: Major teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Procedure numbers.
RESULTS: In large cities, the number of colonoscopies performed by gastroenterologists increased ( approximately 2-fold) over the study period (there was minimal change in endoscopy numbers by surgeons). In contrast, in smaller communities, EGDs and colonoscopies by surgeons increased about 2-fold (from approximately 4065 to 7288) and about 4-fold (from approximately 1909 to approximately 7629), respectively (with only a minimal increase in colonoscopies ( approximately 3000), by gastroenterologists. During training, gastroenterology fellows performed significantly more procedures (EGDs, 29 +/- 5.6 by surgery residents vs 363.9 +/- 12.7 by gastroenterology fellows; colonoscopies, 91 +/- 14.2 by surgery residents vs 247.8 +/- 21.6 by gastroenterology fellows). LIMITATION: All training data are from a single teaching center.
CONCLUSIONS: All gastroenterology fellows, but none of the surgery residents, achieved the minimum number of endoscopic procedures recommended by the ASGE to assess competency. These data suggest that we must reexamine our training programs and/or our methods for evaluating endoscopic competence.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18640675     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.1088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  15 in total

1.  Surgical resident's training in colonoscopy: numbers, competency, and perceptions.

Authors:  Bret J Spier; Emily T Durkin; Andrew J Walker; Eugene Foley; Eric A Gaumnitz; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Endoscopy services and training: a national survey of general surgeons.

Authors:  Daniel Skubleny; Noah Switzer; Shahzeer Karmali; Christopher de Gara
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  The role of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in treating postoperative complications in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Richdeep S Gill; Kevin A Whitlock; Rachid Mohamed; Koroush Sarkhosh; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-01

4.  Endoscopy in Canada: Proceedings of the National Roundtable.

Authors:  Noah Switzer; Elijah Dixon; Jill Tinmouth; Nori Bradley; Melina Vassiliou; Steve Schwaitzberg; Tony Gomes; James Ellsmere; Chris de Gara
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-17

5.  Validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index as a tool to evaluate the learning curve for endoscopy training.

Authors:  Rachid Mohamed; Maitreyi Raman; John Anderson; Kevin McLaughlin; Alaa Rostom; Sylvain Coderre
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-03

Review 6.  Post-Colonoscopy Complications: A Systematic Review, Time Trends, and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Ankie Reumkens; Eveline J A Rondagh; C Minke Bakker; Bjorn Winkens; Ad A M Masclee; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Preliminary clinical results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Antonello Trecca; Filippo Catalano; Antonino Bella; Raffaele Borghini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Evaluation of endoscopist and pathologist factors affecting the incidence of microscopic colitis.

Authors:  Christopher N Andrews; Paul L Beck; Lynn Wilsack; Stefan J Urbanski; Martin Storr
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Assessing resident performance and training of colonoscopy in a general surgery training program.

Authors:  William W Hope; W Borden Hooks; S Nicole Kilbourne; Ashley Adams; Cyrus A Kotwall; Thomas V Clancy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists: a multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Bielawska; Andrew G Day; David A Lieberman; Lawrence C Hookey
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.