OBJECTIVE: In the United States, data from federally funded genomics studies are stored in national databases, which may be accessible to anyone online (public release) or only to qualified researchers (restricted release). The availability of such data exposes participants to privacy risk and limits the ability to withdraw from research. This exposure is especially challenging for pediatric participants, who are enrolled in studies with parental permission. The current study examines genomic research participants' attitudes to explore differences in data sharing (DS) preferences between parents of pediatric patients and adult patients. METHODS: A total of 113 parents of pediatric patients and 196 adult participants from 6 genomics studies were randomly assigned to 3 experimental consent forms. Participants were invited to a follow-up structured interview exploring DS preferences, study understanding, and attitudes. Descriptive analyses and regression models were built on responses. RESULTS: Most parents (73.5%) and adult participants (90.3%) ultimately consented to broad public release. However, parents were significantly more restrictive in their data release decisions, not because of understanding or perceived benefits of participation but rather autonomy and control. Parents want to be more involved in the decision about DS and are significantly more concerned than adult participants about unknown future risks. CONCLUSIONS: Parents have the same altruistic motivations and grasp of genomics studies as adult participants. However, they are more concerned about future risks to their child, which probably motivates them to choose more restrictive DS options, but only when such options are made available.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: In the United States, data from federally funded genomics studies are stored in national databases, which may be accessible to anyone online (public release) or only to qualified researchers (restricted release). The availability of such data exposes participants to privacy risk and limits the ability to withdraw from research. This exposure is especially challenging for pediatric participants, who are enrolled in studies with parental permission. The current study examines genomic research participants' attitudes to explore differences in data sharing (DS) preferences between parents of pediatric patients and adult patients. METHODS: A total of 113 parents of pediatric patients and 196 adult participants from 6 genomics studies were randomly assigned to 3 experimental consent forms. Participants were invited to a follow-up structured interview exploring DS preferences, study understanding, and attitudes. Descriptive analyses and regression models were built on responses. RESULTS: Most parents (73.5%) and adult participants (90.3%) ultimately consented to broad public release. However, parents were significantly more restrictive in their data release decisions, not because of understanding or perceived benefits of participation but rather autonomy and control. Parents want to be more involved in the decision about DS and are significantly more concerned than adult participants about unknown future risks. CONCLUSIONS: Parents have the same altruistic motivations and grasp of genomics studies as adult participants. However, they are more concerned about future risks to their child, which probably motivates them to choose more restrictive DS options, but only when such options are made available.
Entities:
Keywords:
data sharing; parents; participant perspectives; public release; restricted release; tiered consent
Authors: Deanne M Taylor; Bruce J Aronow; Kai Tan; Kathrin Bernt; Nathan Salomonis; Casey S Greene; Alina Frolova; Sarah E Henrickson; Andrew Wells; Liming Pei; Jyoti K Jaiswal; Jeffrey Whitsett; Kathryn E Hamilton; Sonya A MacParland; Judith Kelsen; Robert O Heuckeroth; S Steven Potter; Laura A Vella; Natalie A Terry; Louis R Ghanem; Benjamin C Kennedy; Ingo Helbig; Kathleen E Sullivan; Leslie Castelo-Soccio; Arnold Kreigstein; Florian Herse; Martijn C Nawijn; Gerard H Koppelman; Melissa Haendel; Nomi L Harris; Jo Lynne Rokita; Yuanchao Zhang; Aviv Regev; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Jennifer E Rood; Timothy L Tickle; Roser Vento-Tormo; Saif Alimohamed; Monkol Lek; Jessica C Mar; Kathleen M Loomes; David M Barrett; Prech Uapinyoying; Alan H Beggs; Pankaj B Agrawal; Yi-Wen Chen; Amanda B Muir; Lana X Garmire; Scott B Snapper; Javad Nazarian; Steven H Seeholzer; Hossein Fazelinia; Larry N Singh; Robert B Faryabi; Pichai Raman; Noor Dawany; Hongbo Michael Xie; Batsal Devkota; Sharon J Diskin; Stewart A Anderson; Eric F Rappaport; William Peranteau; Kathryn A Wikenheiser-Brokamp; Sarah Teichmann; Douglas Wallace; Tao Peng; Yang-Yang Ding; Man S Kim; Yi Xing; Sek Won Kong; Carsten G Bönnemann; Kenneth D Mandl; Peter S White Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Sarah Adelsperger; Cynthia A Prows; Melanie F Myers; Cassandra L Perry; Ariel Chandler; Ingrid A Holm; John A Lynch Journal: Health Commun Date: 2016-08-30
Authors: Jerry J Zimmerman; Kanwaljeet J S Anand; Kathleen L Meert; Douglas F Willson; Christopher J L Newth; Rick Harrison; Joseph A Carcillo; John Berger; Tammara L Jenkins; Carol Nicholson; J Michael Dean Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Kimberly LeBlanc; Emily G Kelley; Anna Nagy; Jorick Bater; Tala Berro; Molly A McGuinness; Courtney Studwell; Matthew Might Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Margaret Matson; Kathryn Macapagal; Ashley Kraus; Ryan Coventry; Emily Bettin; Celia B Fisher; Brian Mustanski Journal: Sex Res Social Policy Date: 2019-01-10