Literature DB >> 7738612

Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials.

C Daugherty1, M J Ratain, E Grochowski, C Stocking, E Kodish, R Mick, M Siegler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In an attempt to understand some of the complex issues related to the participation of cancer patients in phase I trials, and the perceptions of patients toward these trials, we conducted a pilot survey study of 30 cancer patients who had given informed consent to participate in a phase I trial at our institution. Concurrently, the oncologists identified by the surveyed patients as responsible for their care were surveyed as well. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven of 30 consecutive patients agreed to and completed the survey. Patients were surveyed before they received any investigational agents. Eighteen oncologists participated in this survey study.
RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of patients decided to participate in a phase I trial for reasons of possible therapeutic benefit, 11% because of advice/trust of physicians, and 4% because of family pressures. Ninety-three percent said that they understood all (33%) or most (60%) of the information provided about the trials in which they had decided to participate. Only 33% were able to state the purpose of the trial in which they were participating, with patients able to state the purpose of phase I trials being more educated (P = .01). Surveyed oncologists had wide-ranging beliefs regarding expectations of possible benefits and toxicities for their patients participating in phase I trials.
CONCLUSION: Cancer patients who participate in phase I trials are strongly motivated by the hope of therapeutic benefit. Altruistic feelings appear to have a limited and inconsequential role in motivating patients to participate in these trials. Cancer patients who participate in phase I trials appear to have an adequate self-perceived knowledge of the risks of investigational agents. However, only a minority of patients appear to have an adequate understanding of the purpose of phase I trials as dose-escalation/dose-determination studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; University of Chicago Medical Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7738612     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  132 in total

1.  Placebo-controlled trials: good science or medical neglect?

Authors:  G T Chiodo; S W Tolle; L Bevan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-04

Review 2.  Benefits and burdens of placebos in psychiatric research.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Communication and informed consent in phase 1 trials: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A C Cox; L J Fallowfield; V A Jenkins
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Beyond the question of placebo controls: ethical issues in psychopharmacological drug studies.

Authors:  Ellen Frank; Danielle M Novick; David J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Communicating about phase I trials: objective disclosures are only a first step.

Authors:  Anne Lederman Flamm; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-04

Review 6.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 7.  Ethical issues in the development of new agents.

Authors:  C K Daugherty
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Research participants' high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question?

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Damon M Seils; Li Lin; Daniel P Sulmasy; Alan B Astrow; Herbert I Hurwitz; Roger B Cohen; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Clinical trial participation as part of end-of-life cancer care: associations with medical care and quality of life near death.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Jane C Weeks; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Oncologists' recommendations of clinical trial participation to patients.

Authors:  Susan Eggly; Terrance L Albrecht; Felicity W K Harper; Tanina Foster; Melissa M Franks; John C Ruckdeschel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.