Subashan Perera1, Stephanie Studenski2, Anne Newman3, Eleanor Simonsick4, Tamara Harris4, Ann Schwartz5, Marjolein Visser6. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine and ksp9@pitt.edu. 2. Division of Geriatric Medicine and. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. Department of Epidemiology, University of California-San Francisco. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meaningful change criteria help determine if function has improved or declined, but their magnitudes may vary across clinically relevant subgroups. We estimate meaningful decline in four common measures of physical performance in subgroups of older adults based on initial performance, demographics, chronic conditions, and health status. METHODS: We used baseline (Year 1) and Year 4 data from the Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) study, a well-functioning cohort at baseline of white and black men and women (age 70-79), to evaluate the magnitude of meaningful decline in performance (6 m gait speed, 400-m walk time (400MWT), Short Physical Performance Battery, and Health ABC Physical Performance Battery (PPB), based on self-reported perceived mobility anchors (climbing 10 steps and walking ¼ mile). Estimates were stratified by initial performance, demographics, health status, chronic conditions, and body mass index, and compared across strata. RESULTS: For all four measures, small and substantial decline estimates were generally consistent among subgroups based on initial performance, demographics, health status, and chronic conditions. The only exception was for 400MWT, where men had greater estimates than women. For PPB, small change was 0.12 points, and substantial change was 0.22 points. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of small and substantial meaningful decline resemble those previously reported for gait speed, 400MWT, and SPPB. Magnitudes of meaningful performance decline appear to be generally consistent across strata of initial performance, demographics, health status, body mass index, and chronic conditions.
BACKGROUND: Meaningful change criteria help determine if function has improved or declined, but their magnitudes may vary across clinically relevant subgroups. We estimate meaningful decline in four common measures of physical performance in subgroups of older adults based on initial performance, demographics, chronic conditions, and health status. METHODS: We used baseline (Year 1) and Year 4 data from the Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) study, a well-functioning cohort at baseline of white and black men and women (age 70-79), to evaluate the magnitude of meaningful decline in performance (6 m gait speed, 400-m walk time (400MWT), Short Physical Performance Battery, and Health ABC Physical Performance Battery (PPB), based on self-reported perceived mobility anchors (climbing 10 steps and walking ¼ mile). Estimates were stratified by initial performance, demographics, health status, chronic conditions, and body mass index, and compared across strata. RESULTS: For all four measures, small and substantial decline estimates were generally consistent among subgroups based on initial performance, demographics, health status, and chronic conditions. The only exception was for 400MWT, where men had greater estimates than women. For PPB, small change was 0.12 points, and substantial change was 0.22 points. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of small and substantial meaningful decline resemble those previously reported for gait speed, 400MWT, and SPPB. Magnitudes of meaningful performance decline appear to be generally consistent across strata of initial performance, demographics, health status, body mass index, and chronic conditions.
Authors: Anne B Newman; Eleanor M Simonsick; Barbara L Naydeck; Robert M Boudreau; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michael C Nevitt; Marco Pahor; Suzanne Satterfield; Jennifer S Brach; Stephanie A Studenski; Tamara B Harris Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Linda S Ng; Jack M Guralnik; Cora Man; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; David Strogatz; David W Eby; Lindsay H Ryan; Lisa J Molnar; Marian E Betz; Linda Hill; Guohua Li; Christopher L Crowe; Thelma J Mielenz Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2020-01-24
Authors: Wei Duan-Porter; Tien N Vo; Kristen Ullman; Lisa Langsetmo; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Brent C Taylor; Adam J Santanasto; Peggy M Cawthon; Anne B Newman; Eleanor M Simonsick; Teresa M Waters; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Subashan Perera; Kushang V Patel; Caterina Rosano; Susan M Rubin; Suzanne Satterfield; Tamara Harris; Kristine Ensrud; Eric Orwoll; Christine G Lee; Julie M Chandler; Anne B Newman; Jane A Cauley; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-08-22 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Elizabeth A Chmelo; Charlotte I Crotts; Jill C Newman; Tina E Brinkley; Mary F Lyles; Xiaoyan Leng; Anthony P Marsh; Barbara J Nicklas Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Denise K Houston; Rebecca H Neiberg; Michael E Miller; James O Hill; John M Jakicic; Karen C Johnson; Edward W Gregg; Van S Hubbard; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; W Jack Rejeski; Rena R Wing; John P Bantle; Elizabeth Beale; Robert I Berkowitz; Maria Cassidy-Begay; Jeanne M Clark; Mace Coday; Linda M Delahanty; Gareth Dutton; Caitlin Egan; John P Foreyt; Frank L Greenway; Helen P Hazuda; Andrea Hergenroeder; Edward S Horton; Robert W Jeffery; Steven E Kahn; Anne Kure; William C Knowler; Cora E Lewis; Corby K Martin; Sara Michaels; Maria G Montez; David M Nathan; Jennifer Patricio; Anne Peters; Henry Pownall; Judith Regensteiner; Helmut Steinburg; Thomas A Wadden; Karen White; Susan Z Yanovski; Ping Zhang; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Eleanor M Simonsick; Jennifer A Schrack; Adam J Santanasto; Stephanie A Studenski; Luigi Ferrucci; Nancy W Glynn Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Sara J Francois; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Sandra Gilmore; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: PM R Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Jennifer G Naples; Zachary A Marcum; Subashan Perera; Anne B Newman; Susan L Greenspan; Shelly L Gray; Douglas C Bauer; Eleanor M Simonsick; Ronald I Shorr; Joseph T Hanlon Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.923