Literature DB >> 19536422

What is a meaningful change in physical performance? Findings from a clinical trial in older adults (the LIFE-P study).

S Kwon1, S Perera, M Pahor, J A Katula, A C King, E J Groessl, S A Studenski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Performance measures provide important information, but the meaning of change in these measures is not well known. The purpose of this research is to 1) examine the effect of treatment assignment on the relationship between self-report and performance; 2) to estimate the magnitude of meaningful change in 400-meter walk time (400MWT), 4-meter gait speed (4MGS), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and 3) to evaluate the effect of direction of change on estimates of magnitude.
DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data from the LIFE-P study, a single blinded randomized clinical trial. Using change over one year, we applied distribution-based and anchor-based methods for self-reported mobility to estimate minimally important and substantial change in 400MWT, 4MGS and SPPB.
SETTING: Four university-based clinical research sites. PARTICIPANTS: Sedentary adults aged 70-89 whose SPPB scores were less than 10 and who were able to complete a 400MW at baseline (n=424).
INTERVENTIONS: A structured exercise program versus health education. MEASUREMENTS: 400MWT, 4MGS, SPPB.
RESULTS: Relationships between self-report and performance measures were consistent between treatment arms. Minimally significant change estimates were 400MWT: 20-30 seconds, 4MGS: 0.03-0.05m/s and SPPB: 0.3 - 0.8 points. Substantial changes were 400MWT: 50-60 seconds, 4MGS: 0.08m/s, SPPB: 0.4 - 1.5 points. Magnitudes of change for improvement and decline were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of clinically important change in physical performance measures is reasonably consistent using several analytic techniques and appears to be achievable in clinical trials of exercise. Due to limited power, the effect of direction of change on estimates of magnitude remains uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19536422      PMCID: PMC3100159          DOI: 10.1007/s12603-009-0104-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  25 in total

1.  Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life.

Authors:  K W Wyrwich; N A Nienaber; W M Tierney; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Methods to assess and improve the physical parameters associated with fall risk in older adults.

Authors:  Michael E Rogers; Nicole L Rogers; Nobuo Takeshima; Mohammod M Islam
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ross D Crosby; Ronette L Kolotkin; G Rhys Williams
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: the FACIT experience.

Authors:  Kathleen J Yost; David T Eton
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  The lifestyle interventions and independence for elders (LIFE) pilot study: design and methods.

Authors:  W Jack Rejeski; Roger A Fielding; Steven N Blair; Jack M Guralnik; Thomas M Gill; Evan C Hadley; Abby C King; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michael E Miller; Anne B Newman; Marco Pahor
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission.

Authors:  J M Guralnik; E M Simonsick; L Ferrucci; R J Glynn; L F Berkman; D G Blazer; P A Scherr; R B Wallace
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-03

7.  Physical performance measures in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Stephanie Studenski; Subashan Perera; Dennis Wallace; Julie M Chandler; Pamela W Duncan; Earl Rooney; Michael Fox; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  The 6-min walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults.

Authors:  Paul L Enright; Mary Ann McBurnie; Vera Bittner; Russell P Tracy; Robert McNamara; Alice Arnold; Anne B Newman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Walking performance and cardiovascular response: associations with age and morbidity--the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study.

Authors:  Anne B Newman; Catherine L Haggerty; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michael C Nevitt; Eleanor M Simonsick
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Reliability of the 400-m usual-pace walk test as an assessment of mobility limitation in older adults.

Authors:  Yves M Rolland; Matteo Cesari; Michael E Miller; Brenda W Penninx; Hal H Atkinson; Marco Pahor
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  198 in total

1.  Increased trunk extension endurance is associated with meaningful improvement in balance among older adults with mobility problems.

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; Dan K Kiely; Suzanne G Leveille; Walter R Frontera; Jonathan F Bean
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use by older adults is associated with greater functional responses to exercise.

Authors:  Thomas W Buford; Todd M Manini; Fang-Chi Hsu; Matteo Cesari; Stephen D Anton; Susan Nayfield; Randall S Stafford; Timothy S Church; Marco Pahor; Christy S Carter
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Impact of pain reported during isometric quadriceps muscle strength testing in people with knee pain: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Paul W Stratford
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-08-11

4.  Do worsening knee radiographs mean greater chances of severe functional limitation?

Authors:  Daniel K White; Yuqing Zhang; Jingbo Niu; Julie J Keysor; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Tuhina Neogi
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Independent Associations Between Sedentary Behaviors and Mental, Cognitive, Physical, and Functional Health Among Older Adults in Retirement Communities.

Authors:  Dori E Rosenberg; John Bellettiere; Paul A Gardiner; Veronica N Villarreal; Katie Crist; Jacqueline Kerr
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  What physical attributes underlie self-reported vs. observed ability to walk 400 m in later life? An analysis from the InCHIANTI Study.

Authors:  Marla K Beauchamp; Suzanne G Leveille; Kushang V Patel; Dan K Kiely; Caroline L Phillips; Stefania Bandinelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik; Jonathan F Bean
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 7.  Toward exercise as personalized medicine.

Authors:  Thomas W Buford; Michael D Roberts; Timothy S Church
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Adequate dietary protein is associated with better physical performance among post-menopausal women 60-90 years.

Authors:  L Gregorio; J Brindisi; A Kleppinger; R Sullivan; K M Mangano; J D Bihuniak; A M Kenny; J E Kerstetter; K L Insogna
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.075

9.  Biomarker-calibrated protein intake and physical function in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Jeannette M Beasley; Betsy C Wertheim; Andrea Z LaCroix; Ross L Prentice; Marian L Neuhouser; Lesley F Tinker; Stephen Kritchevsky; James M Shikany; Charles Eaton; Zhao Chen; Cynthia A Thomson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Adrian S Dobs; Ralph V Boccia; Christopher C Croot; Nashat Y Gabrail; James T Dalton; Michael L Hancock; Mary A Johnston; Mitchell S Steiner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.