Subashan Perera1, Kushang V Patel2, Caterina Rosano3, Susan M Rubin4, Suzanne Satterfield5, Tamara Harris6, Kristine Ensrud7, Eric Orwoll8, Christine G Lee9, Julie M Chandler10, Anne B Newman3, Jane A Cauley3, Jack M Guralnik11, Luigi Ferrucci12, Stephanie A Studenski12. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. ksp9@pitt.edu. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco. 5. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis. 6. Geriatric Epidemiology Section, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis VA Health Care System. 8. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland. 9. Research Service, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Portland, Oregon. 10. Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey. 11. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park. 12. Longitudinal Studies Section, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional independence with aging is an important goal for individuals and society. Simple prognostic indicators can inform health promotion and care planning, but evidence is limited by heterogeneity in measures of function. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of data from seven studies of 27,220 community-dwelling older adults aged 65 or older with baseline gait speed, followed for disability and mortality. Outcomes were incident inability or dependence on another person in bathing or dressing; and difficulty walking ¼ - ½ mile or climbing 10 steps within 3 years. RESULTS: Participants with faster baseline gait had lower rates of incident disability. In subgroups (defined by 0.2 m/s-wide intervals from <0.4 to ≥ 1.4 m/s) with increasingly greater gait speed, 3-year rates of bathing or dressing dependence trended from 10% to 1% in men, and from 15% to 1% in women, while mobility difficulty trended from 47% to 4% in men and 40% to 6% in women. The age-adjusted relative risk ratio per 0.1 m/s greater speed for bathing or dressing dependence in men was 0.68 (0.57-0.81) and in women: 0.74 (0.66-0.82); for mobility difficulty, men: 0.75 (0.68-0.82), women: 0.73 (0.67-0.80). Results were similar for combined disability and mortality. Effects were largely consistent across subgroups based on age, gender, race, body mass index, prior hospitalization, and selected chronic conditions. In the presence of multiple other risk factors for disability, gait speed significantly increased the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve. CONCLUSION: In older adults, gait speed predicts 3 year incidence of bathing or dressing dependence, mobility difficulty, and a composite outcome of disability and mortality.
BACKGROUND: Functional independence with aging is an important goal for individuals and society. Simple prognostic indicators can inform health promotion and care planning, but evidence is limited by heterogeneity in measures of function. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of data from seven studies of 27,220 community-dwelling older adults aged 65 or older with baseline gait speed, followed for disability and mortality. Outcomes were incident inability or dependence on another person in bathing or dressing; and difficulty walking ¼ - ½ mile or climbing 10 steps within 3 years. RESULTS:Participants with faster baseline gait had lower rates of incident disability. In subgroups (defined by 0.2 m/s-wide intervals from <0.4 to ≥ 1.4 m/s) with increasingly greater gait speed, 3-year rates of bathing or dressing dependence trended from 10% to 1% in men, and from 15% to 1% in women, while mobility difficulty trended from 47% to 4% in men and 40% to 6% in women. The age-adjusted relative risk ratio per 0.1 m/s greater speed for bathing or dressing dependence in men was 0.68 (0.57-0.81) and in women: 0.74 (0.66-0.82); for mobility difficulty, men: 0.75 (0.68-0.82), women: 0.73 (0.67-0.80). Results were similar for combined disability and mortality. Effects were largely consistent across subgroups based on age, gender, race, body mass index, prior hospitalization, and selected chronic conditions. In the presence of multiple other risk factors for disability, gait speed significantly increased the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve. CONCLUSION: In older adults, gait speed predicts 3 year incidence of bathing or dressing dependence, mobility difficulty, and a composite outcome of disability and mortality.
Authors: Eric Orwoll; Janet Babich Blank; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane Cauley; Steven Cummings; Kristine Ensrud; Cora Lewis; Peggy M Cawthon; Robert Marcus; Lynn M Marshall; Joan McGowan; Kathy Phipps; Sherry Sherman; Marcia L Stefanick; Katie Stone Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Chad Boult; Ariel Frank Green; Lisa B Boult; James T Pacala; Claire Snyder; Bruce Leff Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: G Abellan van Kan; Y Rolland; S Andrieu; J Bauer; O Beauchet; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; L M Donini; S Gillette Guyonnet; M Inzitari; F Nourhashemi; G Onder; P Ritz; A Salva; M Visser; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Mehri S McKellar; Maragatha N Kuchibhatla; Kris Ann K Oursler; Stephen Crystal; Kathleen M Akgün; Kristina Crothers; Cynthia L Gibert; Karen Nieves-Lugo; Julie Womack; Janet P Tate; Gerda G Fillenbaum Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Joe Verghese; Cuiling Wang; David A Bennett; Richard B Lipton; Mindy J Katz; Emmeline Ayers Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: David J Clark; Sudeshna A Chatterjee; Theresa E McGuirk; Eric C Porges; Emily J Fox; Chitralakshmi K Balasubramanian Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Woei-Nan Bair; Michael Petr; Irene Alfaras; Sarah J Mitchell; Michel Bernier; Luigi Ferrucci; Stephanie A Studenski; Rafael De Cabo Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Sandra Gilmore; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Deborah Brodine; David Wert; Neelesh K Nadkarni; Edmund Ricci Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 2.226