Literature DB >> 24612509

Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

J C Lipham1, P A Taiganides, B E Louie, R A Ganz, T R DeMeester.   

Abstract

Antireflux surgery with a magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSAD) restores the competency of the lower esophageal sphincter with a device rather than a tissue fundoplication. As a regulated device, safety information from the published clinical literature can be supplemented by tracking under the Safe Medical Devices Act. The aim of this study was to examine the safety profile of the MSAD in the first 1000 implanted patients. We compiled safety data from all available sources as of July 1, 2013. The analysis included intra/perioperative complications, hospital readmissions, procedure-related interventions, reoperations, and device malfunctions leading to injury or inability to complete the procedure. Over 1000 patients worldwide have been implanted with the MSAD at 82 institutions with median implant duration of 274 days. Event rates were 0.1% intra/perioperative complications, 1.3% hospital readmissions, 5.6% endoscopic dilations, and 3.4% reoperations. All reoperations were performed non-emergently for device removal, with no complications or conversion to laparotomy. The primary reason for device removal was dysphagia. No device migrations or malfunctions were reported. Erosion of the device occurred in one patient (0.1%). The safety analysis of the first 1000 patients treated with MSAD for gastroesophageal reflux disease confirms the safety of this device and the implantation technique. The overall event rates were low based on data from 82 institutions. The MSAD is a safe therapeutic option for patients with chronic, uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease.
© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antireflux surgery; complication; gastroesophageal reflux disease; lower esophageal sphincter

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24612509     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  38 in total

1.  Lower Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Persistent Reflux After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Juan A Muñoz-Largacha; Donald T Hess; Virginia R Litle; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Endoluminal perforation of a magnetic antireflux device.

Authors:  Margit Bauer; Alexander Meining; Michael Kranzfelder; Alissa Jell; Rebekka Schirren; Dirk Wilhelm; Helmut Friess; Hubertus Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Standard vs Expanded Indications for Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Reflux Disease.

Authors:  John P Kuckelman; Cody J Phillips; Mark O Hardin; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation as a Novel Approach to Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  John P Kuckelman; Cody J Phillips; Michael J Derickson; Byron J Faler; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery.

Authors:  James M Tatum; Evan Alicuben; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; Kamran Samakar; Caitlin C Houghton; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.

Authors:  Emanuele Asti; Alberto Aiolfi; Veronica Lazzari; Andrea Sironi; Matteo Porta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-18

7.  Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Skubleny; Noah J Switzer; Jerry Dang; Richdeep S Gill; Xinzhe Shi; Christopher de Gara; Daniel W Birch; Clarence Wong; Matthew M Hutter; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Surgical Anti-Reflux Options Beyond Fundoplication.

Authors:  Dan Azagury; John Morton
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-07

Review 10.  Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Hongke Zhang; Dinghui Dong; Zhengwen Liu; Shuixiang He; Liangshuo Hu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.