Literature DB >> 24604620

Does stem design influence component positioning in total hip arthroplasty using a minimal invasive posterolateral approach?

Wenzel Waldstein1, Christian Merle, Tom Schmidt-Braekling, Friedrich Boettner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Limited data exist for the reconstructive potential of short bone-preserving stems in THA using a minimal invasive posterolateral approach. Our study aim was to assess the effect of stem design on the reconstruction of hip offset and leg length in MIS posterolateral THA.
METHODS: This retrospective consecutive single-surgeon study compares hip offset and leg length, as well as acetabular component positioning (cup anteversion; inclination) of 129 THAs with a cementless standard-length stem (Synergy®) and 143 THAs with a cementless short bone-preserving stem (Trilock®).
RESULTS: In reference to the contralateral side, the mean difference in hip offset was 0.9 mm (p = 0.067) for the standard stem and 0.1 mm (p = 0.793) for the short stem, respectively. Leg-length discrepancy was 0.7 mm (Synergy®) and 0.9 mm (Trilock®), respectively. A total of 233 (86 %) acetabular components fell within the target zone for anteversion and inclination.
CONCLUSION: Accurate component positioning in MIS posterolateral approach THA is possible and is not influenced by the type of stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24604620      PMCID: PMC4071493          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2299-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; Richard A Berger; John J Callaghan; Lawrence D Dorr; Paul J Duwelius; Mark A Hartzband; Jay R Lieberman; Dana C Mears
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Howell; Donald S Garbuz; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Biologic fixation of a press-fit titanium hip joint endoprosthesis.

Authors:  K A Zweymüller; F K Lintner; M F Semlitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Biological fixation of porous-coated implants.

Authors:  R J Haddad; S D Cook; K A Thomas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph.

Authors:  L Yao; J Yao; R H Gold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Femoral preparation in cemented total hip arthroplasty: reaming or broaching?

Authors:  C W DiGiovanni; K L Garvin; P M Pellicci
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Christian Merle; George Grammatopoulos; Wenzel Waldstein; Elise Pegg; Hemant Pandit; Peter R Aldinger; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  C D Fackler; R Poss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  James F Wenz; Ilksen Gurkan; Stefan R Jibodh
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy assessment during anterior minimally invasive hip replacement is more accurate than with the posterior approach.

Authors:  Weifeng Ji; Nathaniel Stewart
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Discrepancy of Trial Rasp and Femoral Stem Relative Position Within the Femoral Canal of a Coated Tapered System: An Intraoperative, Intrapatient Controlled Study.

Authors:  Thomas Hofstaedter; Michael Najfeld; Gion Fessel; Luca C Orlandini; Robert Hube
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-09-25

3.  Serum cobalt concentrations remain at low levels at a minimum of 20 years following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wenzel Waldstein; Ulrich Koller; Bernhard Springer; Paul Kolbitsch; Wolfram Brodner; Reinhard Windhager; Richard Lass
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.853

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.