Literature DB >> 15062696

Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation.

Jonathan R Howell1, Donald S Garbuz, Clive P Duncan.   

Abstract

The term minimally invasive hip replacement encompasses a diverse range of surgical approaches through which hip replacement may be performed. These surgical approaches are technically demanding and are best performed using specially designed instruments that help to compensate for the reduced surgical exposure. The early results using these techniques are encouraging, although the literature is lacking evidence from well designed prospective trials comparing MIS techniques with standard approaches. The studies that exist suggest that patient satisfaction is high, bleeding may be reduced, recovery of function may be faster, and there may be the potential to reduce lengths of hospital stay, and all this may be achieved without increasing complication rates. These results,however, have been achieved by a small number of high-volume surgeons, and the authors feel it is essential that as these techniques are introduced into widespread practice the results be studied carefully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15062696     DOI: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00112-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  17 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a transpiriformis approach: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Douglas J Roger; David Hill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Modified Hardinge approach with limited incision].

Authors:  M Schneider; I Kawahara; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Factors influencing early rehabilitation after THA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivek Sharma; Patrick M Morgan; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Cheng; J G Feng; T Liu; X L Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Minimally invasive subvastus approach: improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  José Ramón Varela-Egocheaga; Miguel Angel Suárez-Suárez; María Fernández-Villán; Vanessa González-Sastre; José Ramón Varela-Gómez; Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference.

Authors:  J R Varela-Egocheaga; M A Suárez-Suárez; M Fernández-Villán; V González-Sastre; J R Varela-Gómez; A Murcia-Mazón
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-12-03

7.  Does stem design influence component positioning in total hip arthroplasty using a minimal invasive posterolateral approach?

Authors:  Wenzel Waldstein; Christian Merle; Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Age-related appearance of muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty and the benefit of a minimally invasive approach for patients older than 70 years.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Stephan Tohtz; Marc Dewey; Ivonne Springer; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Repantis; T Bouras; P Korovessis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

10.  Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  C Yang; Q Zhu; Y Han; J Zhu; H Wang; R Cong; D Zhang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.