Literature DB >> 24604276

Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount.

Michael Moen1, Michael Noone, Brett Vassallo.   

Abstract

Anterior compartment repair is one of the most challenging issues in reconstructive pelvic surgery. Previous studies using strict anatomic criteria suggested a high failure rate after anterior colporrhaphy, prompting increased use of augmented repairs in the past decade. More recent studies suggest anterior colporrhaphy may provide symptom relief similar to that seen with augmented repairs without the risks associated with placement of mesh. There is a wide range of success rates for anterior colporrhaphy in the literature. The wide variation implies surgeon performance is a key issue in the success or failure of anterior compartment repair. It is critical to begin measuring and reporting surgeon performance in research trials and monitoring surgeon performance in clinical practice in order to make meaningful comparisons of surgical techniques and improve patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24604276     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2345-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  49 in total

1.  Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Paulo Cezar Feldner; Rodrigo Aquino Castro; Luiz Antonio Cipolotti; Carlos Antonio Delroy; Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori; Manoel João Batista Castello Girão
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Colporrhaphy compared with mesh or graft-reinforced vaginal paravaginal repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shawn A Menefee; Keisha Y Dyer; Emily S Lukacz; Amanda J Simsiman; Karl M Luber; John N Nguyen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh.

Authors:  A Vollebregt; K Fischer; D Gietelink; C H van der Vaart
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure.

Authors:  Mariëlla I Withagen; Mark E Vierhout; Jan C Hendriks; Kirsten B Kluivers; Alfredo L Milani
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Randomised comparison of Burch colposuspension versus anterior colporrhaphy in women with stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Authors:  M Colombo; D Vitobello; F Proietti; R Milani
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Reijo Hiltunen; Kari Nieminen; Teuvo Takala; Eila Heiskanen; Mauri Merikari; Kirsti Niemi; Pentti K Heinonen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Anthony G Visco; Alison C Weidner; Virginia Pate; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Joshua L Woelk; Elizabeth R Casiano; Amy L Weaver; Bobbie S Gostout; Emanuel C Trabuco; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Anterior repair with or without collagen matrix reinforcement: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nathan L Guerette; Thais V Peterson; Oscar A Aguirre; Douglas M VanDrie; Daniel H Biller; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Carey; P Higgs; J Goh; J Lim; A Leong; H Krause; A Cornish
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  3 in total

1.  Choice of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: vaginal or abdominal, native tissue or synthetic grafts, open abdominal versus laparoscopic or robotic.

Authors:  Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion.

Authors:  Sharif Ismail; Jonathan Duckett; Diaa Rizk; Olanrewaju Sorinola; Dorothy Kammerer-Doak; Oscar Contreras-Ortiz; Hazem Al-Mandeel; Kamil Svabik; Mitesh Parekh; Christian Phillips
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery.

Authors:  Debjyoti Karmakar; Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.