Literature DB >> 17666627

Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Reijo Hiltunen1, Kari Nieminen, Teuvo Takala, Eila Heiskanen, Mauri Merikari, Kirsti Niemi, Pentti K Heinonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare anterior colporrhaphy with and without a tailored mesh.
METHODS: Postmenopausal women with anterior vaginal prolapse to the hymen or beyond were randomly assigned to undergo traditional anterior colporrhaphy alone or reinforced with mesh. The low-weight monofilament polypropylene mesh was self-tailored, having four arms and being placed over the plicated fascia. Before and 2 and 12 months after surgery, participants were evaluated by physical examination, postvoidal residual urine measurement and standard questions covering prolapse-related symptoms. The primary outcome was recurrence of anterior vaginal prolapse at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included operative complications, symptom resolution, and postvoidal urine residual volume.
RESULTS: Of the 202 women randomly assigned, 201 were operated on (97 without, 104 with mesh). Thirty-seven women (38.5%) in the no-mesh and seven (6.7%) in the mesh group experienced a recurrence of anterior wall prolapse (P<.001) at 12 months; as a result, the number needed to treat for benefit was four. The mean (standard deviation) postvoidal residual urine volume was lower in patients with mesh than in those undergoing the traditional operation: 25 (26) mL and 41 (57) mL (P=.01). Twenty-three women (23%) with mesh and 9 (10%) with no mesh reported stress urinary incontinence (P=.02). In 18 (17.3%), exposure of the mesh was noted, mainly asymptomatic.
CONCLUSION: Anterior colporrhaphy, reinforced with, tailored mesh significantly reduced the rate of recurrence of anterior vaginal wall prolapse compared with the traditional operation, but was associated more often with stress urinary incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17666627     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000261899.87638.0a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  87 in total

1.  Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse".

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Adam Holzberg; Heather van Raalte; Neeraj Kohli; Howard B Goldman; Vincent Lucente
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Failures and complications in pelvic floor surgery.

Authors:  Kiran Ashok; Eckhard Petri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Evaluation of current synthetic mesh materials in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Prashanth Kanagarajah; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Christopher Gomez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Karen P Gold; Renee M Ward; Carl W Zimmerman; Daniel H Biller; Shawn McGuinn; James C Slaughter; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Genital prolapse in women.

Authors:  Joseph Loze Onwude
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-03-14

6.  Correlation between shrinkage and infection of implanted synthetic meshes using an animal model of mesh infection.

Authors:  Laurent Mamy; Vincent Letouzey; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Xavier Garric; Jean Gondry; Pierre Mares; Renaud de Tayrac
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Evaluating the porcine dermis graft InteXen in three-compartment transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Julian Mairot; Marie-Caroline Clement; Bernard Parratte; Robert Maillet; Didier Riethmuller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Mesh kits for anterior vaginal prolapse are not cost effective.

Authors:  Sunshine Murray; Rashel M Haverkorn; Yair Lotan; Gary E Lemack
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  The IUGA/ICS classification of synthetic mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  John R Miklos; Orawee Chinthakanan; Robert D Moore; Gretchen K Mitchell; Sheena Favors; Deborah R Karp; Gina M Northington; Gladys M Nogueiras; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Short-term outcomes of vaginal mesh placement among female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Aqsa A Khan; Karyn S Eilber; Erin Chong; Stephanie Histed; Ning Wu; Chris L Pashos; J Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.