Literature DB >> 25023779

Choice of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: vaginal or abdominal, native tissue or synthetic grafts, open abdominal versus laparoscopic or robotic.

Peter L Dwyer1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25023779     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-014-2481-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  The challenge of implementing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jan Deprest; Ladislav Krofta; Frank Van der Aa; Alfredo L Milani; Jan Den Boon; Filip Claerhout; Jan-Paul Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount.

Authors:  Michael Moen; Michael Noone; Brett Vassallo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894
  2 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery.

Authors:  Debjyoti Karmakar; Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Sacrospinous ligament fixation for hysteropexy: does concomitant anterior and posterior fixation improve surgical outcome?

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Ma Clarissa Uy-Patrimonio; Wu-Chiao Hsieh; Ju-Chun Yang; Shih Yin Huang; Sandy Chua
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Laparoscopic approach to pelvic organ prolapse - the way to go or a blind alley?

Authors:  Ewelina Malanowska; Marek Soltes; Andrzej Starczewski; Eckhard Petri; Marcin Jozwik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 1.195
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.