Literature DB >> 10596666

Evaluation of a semiburied, fixed-trajectory, curvilinear, distraction device in an animal model.

E B Seldin1, M J Troulis, L B Kaban.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated a new small, buried distractor, capable of curvilinear movement while following a fixed trajectory. The geometrical basis for such devices and the 3-dimensional treatment planning system required to make buried distractors practical are discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A curved rack and worm-gear device, based on the design of a hose clamp, was constructed to produce a curved distraction path, and this distractor was tested in 2 minipigs using a protocol with zero latency and 1 mm/d x 7 days of distraction. Serial standardized lateral cephalograms were used to verify distractor function and path.
RESULTS: Curvilinear distraction was documented by clinical examination and serial cephalometric analysis in the 2 minipigs. Observed angulation of the margins of the wedge-shaped distraction gap conformed to the calculated angulation based on the fixed radius of curvature of the distractor.
CONCLUSION: Distraction along a curved trajectory using a small, semiburied, curvilinear device of novel design is feasible in the minipig mandible.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10596666     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90729-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  [Evaluation of potential damage to the regenerate during callus molding after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Experimental study using an animal model].

Authors:  C Kunz; N Adolphs; P Buescher; B Hammer; B Rahn
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-05

Review 2.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Matthew E Lawler; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Brian A Murphy; John C Magill; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities.

Authors:  Leonard B Kaban; Edward B Seldin; Ron Kikinis; Krishna Yeshwant; Bonnie L Padwa; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.