| Literature DB >> 32366649 |
Evangelos Mourkas1, Aidan J Taylor2, Guillaume Méric1,3,4, Sion C Bayliss1, Ben Pascoe1, Leonardos Mageiros1, Jessica K Calland1, Matthew D Hitchings5, Anne Ridley6, Ana Vidal6, Ken J Forbes7, Norval J C Strachan8, Craig T Parker9, Julian Parkhill10, Keith A Jolley11, Alison J Cody11, Martin C J Maiden11, David J Kelly12, Samuel K Sheppard13,11.
Abstract
Modern agriculture has dramatically changed the distribution of animal species on Earth. Changes to host ecology have a major impact on the microbiota, potentially increasing the risk of zoonotic pathogens being transmitted to humans, but the impact of intensive livestock production on host-associated bacteria has rarely been studied. Here, we use large isolate collections and comparative genomics techniques, linked to phenotype studies, to understand the timescale and genomic adaptations associated with the proliferation of the most common food-born bacterial pathogen (Campylobacter jejuni) in the most prolific agricultural mammal (cattle). Our findings reveal the emergence of cattle specialist C. jejuni lineages from a background of host generalist strains that coincided with the dramatic rise in cattle numbers in the 20th century. Cattle adaptation was associated with horizontal gene transfer and significant gene gain and loss. This may be related to differences in host diet, anatomy, and physiology, leading to the proliferation of globally disseminated cattle specialists of major public health importance. This work highlights how genomic plasticity can allow important zoonotic pathogens to exploit altered niches in the face of anthropogenic change and provides information for mitigating some of the risks posed by modern agricultural systems.Entities:
Keywords: Campylobacter; adaptation; evolution; genomics; recombination
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32366649 PMCID: PMC7245135 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917168117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Cattle specialist C. jejuni emerged from a background of host generalists. (A) C. jejuni isolates (1,198) from chicken (yellow), ruminants (blue), and other sources (white) are shown on a phylogenetic tree reconstructed using an approximation of the ML algorithm implemented in RAxML, with the major MLST clonal complexes indicated next to the associated genome sequence cluster. The cattle specialist ST-61 clonal complex can be seen emerging from the generalist ST-21 complex (dashed box). The scale bar indicates the estimated number of substitutions per site. (B) ML tree of the branch differentiating ST-61 complex (blue) from ST-21 complex (yellow) isolates highlighting the existence of intermediate isolates (different shades of blue) indicative of step-wise cattle specialization. (C) Average nucleotide identity for pairwise comparisons of 1,208 core and 290 soft core genes for 46 genomes of ST-21 complex (yellow), 49 genomes of ST-61 complex (blue), and 4 intermediate isolates from ST-38 and ST-5161 (black line, black dotted, and black dotted, respectively).
Fig. 2.The emergence of cattle specialist C. jejuni coincides with modern intensive livestock farming. Graph of the estimated number of domestic cattle (blue circles) on Earth from 1850 to 2010 (Inset box from 10000 BC to 2000 AD) based upon data from refs. 24–27. Time-scaled phylogeny of 41 C. jejuni isolates showing dating estimates of the ST-61 complex emergence with ST-5161 as an outgroup, indicated as a gray line. The MRCA of ST-61 and ST-5161 was estimated.
Fig. 3.The cattle specialist lineage genomes show evidence of host adaptation. (A) Gene presence/absence (black circles) and recombination regions (black bars) gained and lost on the tree branch differentiating ST-61 complex cattle specialist C. jejuni inferred using ClonalFrameML and mapped to the NCTC11168 reference genome. Accessory genes not mapped to NCTC11168 are also highlighted on the left (black circles, Upper). The relative abundance of genes was calculated as presence in ST-61 complex isolates minus presence in ST-21 complex isolates. The frequency of all genes/alleles (black circles/bars) is shown for ST-61 and ST-21 complexes (Upper and Lower). The homoplasic genes (red circles), including the glycosylation gene block, and recombinant alleles (red triangles) present or absent in ST-42 complex are shown (Upper and Lower). (B) Single-gene trees for nine candidate cattle-adaptive genes demonstrating homoplasy among cattle specialist lineages. Trees show intermingled clusters of isolates from the two cattle specialist lineages ST-61 (blue) and ST-42 (light blue), separated from the generalist lineage ST-21 (yellow).
Candidate adaptive genes involved in ST-61 complex emergence from ST-21 clonal complex
| Name | Alias | Transcriptional unit no. | Genome position on | Predicted function | COG family | COG family description | Prevalence in ST-21 complex, | Prevalence in ST-61 complex, | Prevalence in ST-42 complex, |
| Accessory genes highly prevalent in ST-61 and ST-42 complexes but missing in ST-21 complex | |||||||||
| — | — | — | Hypothetical protein | — | — | 2 (1.77) | 44 (89.80) | 18 (81.82) | |
| — | — | — | Plasmid stabilization system protein | R | General function prediction only | 2 (1.77) | 44 (89.80) | 18 (81.82) | |
| — | — | Motility accessory factor (homolog) | S | Function unknown | 0 (0) | 45 (91.84) | 21 (95.45) | ||
| — | — | Motility accessory factor (homolog) | S | Function unknown | 0 (0) | 44 (89.80) | 20 (90.91) | ||
| — | — | — | Hypothetical protein | — | — | 4 (3.54) | 48 (97.96) | 22 (100) | |
| — | — | — | Putative McrB subunit of the McrBC restriction endonuclease system | — | — | 0 (0) | 48 (97.96) | 15 (68.18) | |
| Accessory genes highly prevalent in ST-21 complex but missing in ST-61 and ST-42 complexes | |||||||||
| — | 495 | 1248624..1249595 | Putative nucleotide sugar dehydratase | M | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis | 113 (100) | 1 (2.04) | 0 (0) | |
| — | 495 | 1249588..1250742 | Putative DegT family aminotransferase | M | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis | 113 (100) | 2 (4.08) | 0 (0) | |
| — | 498 | 1252278..1253399 | Hypothetical protein | D | Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis | 112 (99.1) | 1 (2.04) | 0 (0) | |
| — | 498 | 1253417..1254092 | Putative methyltransferase | J | Translation | 112 (99.1) | 1 (2.04) | 0 (0) | |
| 498 | 1254132..1255136 | M | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis | 113 (100) | 2 (4.08) | 0 (0) | |||
| 498 | 1255129..1256283 | Putative UDP- | M | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis | 113 (100) | 1 (2.04) | 0 (0) | ||
| — | 498 | 1256292..1257317 | Putative sugar-phosphate nucleotide transferase | J | Translation | 113 (100) | 1 (2.04) | 0 (0) | |
| — | 498 | 1257314..1258219 | Hypothetical protein | R | General function prediction only | 113 (100) | 1 (2.04) | 0 (0) | |
| 498 | 1258212..1258919 | Acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase | M | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis | 113 (100) | 2 (4.08) | 0 (0) | ||
| 498 | 1258919..1259689 | Flagellin modification protein A | I | Lipid transport and metabolism | 113 (100) | 2 (4.08) | 0 (0) | ||
| Alleles of core genes harboring recombination events highly prevalent in ST-61 and ST-42 complexes but missing in ST-21 complex | |||||||||
| 243 | 602326..603186 | Inorganic polyphosphate/ATP-NAD kinase | G | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism | 4 (3.54) | 39 (79.59) | 20 (90.91) | ||
| 248 | 621392..622612 | Argininosuccinate synthase | E | Amino acid transport and metabolism | 4 (3.54) | 48 (97.96) | 21 (95.45) | ||
| 269 | 665788..667125 | Signal recognition particle protein | U | Intracellular trafficking and secretion | 4 (3.54) | 49 (100) | 20 (90.91) | ||
| 395 | 977626..978771 | Thiamine biosynthesis protein ThiH | H | Coenzyme transport and metabolism | 0 (0) | 49 (100) | 22 (100) | ||
| 405 | 1013374..1014186 | Phosphomethylpyrimidine kinase | H | Coenzyme transport and metabolism | 6 (5.31) | 39 (79.59) | 22 (100) | ||
| — | 500 | 1280992..1282299 | Putative fibronectin/fibrinogen-binding protein | K | Transcription | 0 (0) | 47 (95.92) | 17 (77.27) | |
| 501 | 1282361..1282936 | Putative molybdopterin-guanine dinucleotide biosynthesis protein | H | Coenzyme transport and metabolism | 3 (2.65) | 42 (85.71) | 19 (86.36) | ||
| 502 | 1284008..1284976 | Enterochelin uptake permease | P | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism | 3 (2.65) | 48 (97.96) | 22 (100) | ||
| — | 601 | 1558654..1559637 | Putative ATP-binding protein | J | Translation | 0 (0) | 44 (89.80) | 21 (95.45) | |
ST-38 and ST-5161 intermediate isolates were not included in the prevalence calculations. One-letter abbreviations are linked to the functional categories in column 7 as defined by the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) classification (37).
As predicted by the Prokaryotic Operon DataBase (ProOpDB) (38). Consecutive numbers reflect consecutive transcriptional units on the C. jejuni NCTC11168 reference genome.
As predicted by the WebMGA server (39).
Fig. 4.Evidence of cattle associated phenotype variation in C. jejuni. (A) Summary of cattle adaptation based on comparative genomics indicating biological pathways associated with deletion of the glycosylation gene block. (B–G) Phenotype assays comparing two WT chicken specialist strains, id69 and id424 (Dataset S1) and isogenic glycosylation gene block deletion mutants (id69ΔGB and id424ΔGB), and natural specialist and generalist strains from cattle and chicken. (B, D, and F) Chicken-associated lineage mutants show a marked decrease in cellular hydrophobicity, biofilm formation, and autoagglutination compared to WT strains. In assays of natural strain collections, cattle specialist strains show significantly greater mean ammonium sulfate concentration (millimolar) indicating decreased cell hydrophobicity (C), and significantly decreased ability to from biofilms measured as optical absorbance (at 570 nm) (E). (G) No difference was observed in autoagglutination in specialist strains from cattle and chicken, but generalist strains from cattle showed decreased ability to autoagglutinate. Significance was tested using Mann–Whitney U test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.001. The horizontal line in each plot represents the mean value.