Johan Espunyes1,2, Oscar Cabezón3,4, Andrea Dias-Alves3, Pol Miralles4, Teresa Ayats5, Marta Cerdà-Cuéllar5. 1. Wildlife Conservation Medicine Research Group (WildCoM), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. johan.espunyes@uab.cat. 2. Research and Conservation Department, Zoo de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. johan.espunyes@uab.cat. 3. Wildlife Conservation Medicine Research Group (WildCoM), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. 4. UAB, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. 5. IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Livestock play an important role as reservoir of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a health and economic concern worldwide. However, little is known regarding the transmission and maintenance of these pathogens at the wildlife-livestock interface. In this study, we assessed the occurrence, genetic diversity and AMR of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. shed by sympatric free-ranging livestock and a wild herbivore in an alpine ecosystem. RESULTS: Campylobacter spp. was isolated from 23.3 % of cattle and 7.7 % of sheep but was not isolated from horses nor Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica). Campylobacter jejuni was the most frequent species. A high genetic diversity and certain host specificity of C. jejuni isolates was observed. The main AMR detected in Campylobacter isolates was to nalidixic acid (88.2 %), ciprofloxacin (82.4 %) and tetracycline (82.4 %); only 11.7 % of the isolates were pan-susceptible and 17.6 % were multi-resistant. Salmonella ser. Newport was isolated only from one Pyrenean chamois and was pan-susceptible. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that free-ranging cattle and sheep are spreaders of Campylobacter as well as their AMR strains in the alpine environment. Therefore, contaminated alpine pastures or streams may constitute a source for the dissemination of AMR enteropathogens. However, apparently, alpine wild ungulates such as Pyrenean chamois play a negligible role in the epidemiology of zoonotic enteropathogens and AMR, and are not potential bioindicators of the burden of alpine environments.
BACKGROUND: Livestock play an important role as reservoir of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a health and economic concern worldwide. However, little is known regarding the transmission and maintenance of these pathogens at the wildlife-livestock interface. In this study, we assessed the occurrence, genetic diversity and AMR of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. shed by sympatric free-ranging livestock and a wild herbivore in an alpine ecosystem. RESULTS:Campylobacter spp. was isolated from 23.3 % of cattle and 7.7 % of sheep but was not isolated from horses nor Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica). Campylobacter jejuni was the most frequent species. A high genetic diversity and certain host specificity of C. jejuni isolates was observed. The main AMR detected in Campylobacter isolates was to nalidixic acid (88.2 %), ciprofloxacin (82.4 %) and tetracycline (82.4 %); only 11.7 % of the isolates were pan-susceptible and 17.6 % were multi-resistant. Salmonella ser. Newport was isolated only from one Pyrenean chamois and was pan-susceptible. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that free-ranging cattle and sheep are spreaders of Campylobacter as well as their AMR strains in the alpine environment. Therefore, contaminated alpine pastures or streams may constitute a source for the dissemination of AMR enteropathogens. However, apparently, alpine wild ungulates such as Pyrenean chamois play a negligible role in the epidemiology of zoonotic enteropathogens and AMR, and are not potential bioindicators of the burden of alpine environments.
Authors: Rachel Sippy; Claudette M J Sandoval-Green; Orhan Sahin; Paul Plummer; W Sue Fairbanks; Qijing Zhang; Julie A Blanchong Journal: Vet Microbiol Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 3.293
Authors: Elisabet Moré; Teresa Ayats; Peter G Ryan; Preneshni R Naicker; Karen H Keddy; Davide Gaglio; Minke Witteveen; Marta Cerdà-Cuéllar Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Mathilde Mercat; Olivier Clermont; Méril Massot; Etienne Ruppe; Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky; Eve Miguel; Hugo Valls Fox; Daniel Cornelis; Antoine Andremont; Erick Denamur; Alexandre Caron Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: R H Davies; R Dalziel; J C Gibbens; J W Wilesmith; J M B Ryan; S J Evans; C Byrne; G A Paiba; S J S Pascoe; C J Teale Journal: J Appl Microbiol Date: 2004 Impact factor: 3.772
Authors: N Navarro-Gonzalez; M Ugarte-Ruiz; M C Porrero; L Zamora; G Mentaberre; E Serrano; A Mateos; S Lavín; L Domínguez Journal: Ecohealth Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Petra Griekspoor; Frances M Colles; Noel D McCarthy; Philip M Hansbro; Chris Ashhurst-Smith; Björn Olsen; Dennis Hasselquist; Martin C J Maiden; Jonas Waldenström Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 6.185
Authors: Nadine A Vogt; Benjamin M Hetman; Adam A Vogt; David L Pearl; Richard J Reid-Smith; E Jane Parmley; Stefanie Kadykalo; Nicol Janecko; Amrita Bharat; Michael R Mulvey; Kim Ziebell; James Robertson; John Nash; Vanessa Allen; Anna Majury; Nicole Ricker; Kristin J Bondo; Samantha E Allen; Claire M Jardine Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-02-25