Literature DB >> 24592064

Which parameters may influence the duration of hospitalization after vaginal hysterectomy?

Abdulkadir Turgut1, Hatice Ender Soydinç1, Mehmet Sıddık Evsen1, Serdar Başaranoğlu1, Ahmet Yalınkaya1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the variables that may affect the duration of hospitalization after vaginal hysterectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An 11-year retrospective analysis was performed on data derived from 197 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy due to non-malignant pathology at a tertiary care center between January 2000 to November 2011.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients in our series was 60.9±11.1 with a duration of hospitalization of 11.6±6.1 days after vaginal hysterectomy. The grouping variables consisted of age, number of pregnancies, abortions, parities and the presence of intra or postoperative complications. Advanced age (>60), increased number of pregnancies (>5) and parities (>5) and occurrence of intra or postoperative complications were found to be correlated with the duration of hospitalization after vaginal hysterectomy. Categorical variables were analyzed by Pearson's chi square or the Fisher exact test. The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare groups, while the correlation of variables was assessed with the Spearman Correlation Analysis.
CONCLUSION: Vaginal hysterectomy is a safe and effective procedure. Advanced age, increased number of pregnancies and parities and occurrence of intra or postoperative complications may prolong the duration of hospitalization after surgery. Increased experience, careful surgical technique and adherence to aseptic principles may improve the cost-effectivity and decrease the duration of hospitalization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pelvic prolapse; duration of hospitalization; surgery; treatment; vaginal hysterectomy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24592064      PMCID: PMC3881721          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  9 in total

1.  Hysterectomy and incontinence: a study from the Swedish national register for gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Marie A Ellström Engh; Lena Otterlind; Jan-Henrik Stjerndahl; Mats Löfgren
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy--a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ulf Oscarsson; Inger Sundström Poromaa; Emil Nüssler; Mats Löfgren
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Quality of life, health care utilization, and costs among women undergoing hysterectomy in a managed-care setting.

Authors:  S K van den Eeden; M Glasser; S D Mathias; H H Colwell; D J Pasta; K Kunz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Vaginal hysterectomy for benign disorders in obese women: a prospective study.

Authors:  Arash Rafii; Emmanuel Samain; Michel Levardon; Emile Darai; Bruno Deval
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Cost analysis of myomectomy, hysterectomy, and uterine artery embolization.

Authors:  Haya Al-Fozan; Joanne Dufort; Marilyn Kaplow; David Valenti; Togas Tulandi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Vaginal hysterectomy: results and complications of 886 patients.

Authors:  D Akyol; I Esinler; S Guven; M C Salman; A Ayhan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Tariq Miskry; Adam Magos
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  R C Dicker; J R Greenspan; L T Strauss; M R Cowart; M J Scally; H B Peterson; F DeStefano; G L Rubin; H W Ory
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse: a population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional study of patient perceptions of results including sexual activity, urinary symptoms, and provided care.

Authors:  Mojgan Pakbaz; Ingrid Mogren; Mats Löfgren
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.809

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.