Literature DB >> 9465810

Quality of life, health care utilization, and costs among women undergoing hysterectomy in a managed-care setting.

S K van den Eeden1, M Glasser, S D Mathias, H H Colwell, D J Pasta, K Kunz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared quality of life, utilization, and costs for women undergoing elective abdominal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal, or vaginal hysterectomy within a managed-care organization. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study of 287 women who underwent an elective hysterectomy was performed.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing a vaginal hysterectomy reported returning to normal activity levels sooner and had more favorable quality-of-life scores than did those undergoing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy was often nearly as favorable as vaginal hysterectomy, particularly at 28 days after the operation, whereas the abdominal hysterectomy group consistently reported the poorest postoperative quality-of-life scores. No significant differences were noted in utilization or costs in the 60-day preoperative period, whereas hospitalization and postoperative costs were highest among the abdominal hysterectomy group and lowest for those undergoing a vaginal hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal hysterectomy resulted in better quality-of-life outcomes and lower utilization and costs compared with laparoscopically assisted vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9465810     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70633-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal Hysterectomy: The Present Past.

Authors:  Dionysios K Veronikis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Which parameters may influence the duration of hospitalization after vaginal hysterectomy?

Authors:  Abdulkadir Turgut; Hatice Ender Soydinç; Mehmet Sıddık Evsen; Serdar Başaranoğlu; Ahmet Yalınkaya
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-03-01

4.  Hysterectomy…..Which route?

Authors:  Somajita Chakraborty; Sebanti Goswami; Partha Mukherjee; Manabendra Sau
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2011-10-27

5.  Acute kidney injury in major gynaecological surgery: an observational study.

Authors:  A J Vaught; T Ozrazgat-Baslanti; A Javed; L Morgan; C E Hobson; A Bihorac
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Minilaparotomy: a minimally invasive alternative for major gynecologic abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Mark H Glasser
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2005

7.  Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing: prospective observational study of vaginal hysterectomy, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Johanna G van der Bom; C Huub van der Vaart; A Peter M Heintz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

8.  Comparative Effectiveness of a Technology-Facilitated Depression Care Management Model in Safety-Net Primary Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: 6-Month Outcomes of a Large Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shinyi Wu; Kathleen Ell; Haomiao Jin; Irene Vidyanti; Chih-Ping Chou; Pey-Jiuan Lee; Sandra Gross-Schulman; Laura Myerchin Sklaroff; David Belson; Arthur M Nezu; Joel Hay; Chien-Ju Wang; Geoffrey Scheib; Paul Di Capua; Caitlin Hawkins; Pai Liu; Magaly Ramirez; Brian W Wu; Mark Richman; Caitlin Myers; Davin Agustines; Robert Dasher; Alex Kopelowicz; Joseph Allevato; Mike Roybal; Eli Ipp; Uzma Haider; Sharon Graham; Vahid Mahabadi; Jeffrey Guterman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials.

Authors:  Claudia B M Bijen; Karin M Vermeulen; Marian J E Mourits; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of genital prolapse surgery and hysterectomy on pelvic floor function.

Authors:  J-P W R Roovers; M M E Lakeman
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.