Literature DB >> 21528668

Lymph node harvesting in colorectal carcinoma specimens.

Emmanuel Lagoudianakis1, Apostolos Pappas, Nikolaos Koronakis, Dimitrios Tsekouras, John Dallianoudis, Panagiota Kontogianni, Dimitrios Papanikolaou, John Chrysikos, George Karavitis, Haridimos Markogiannakis, Konstantinos Filis, Andreas Manouras.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adequate lymph node evaluation is an important determinant of prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Current guidelines recommend evaluation of at least 12 lymph nodes; however, a significant number of patients fail to meet these criteria. AIM: To investigate the factors that influence adequate recovery and evaluation of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 454 consecutive cases of colorectal cancer surgically treated from September 2000 to September 2006. Univariate and multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis was used to study the effect of various factors in lymph node recovery.
RESULTS: The number of lymph nodes retrieved ranged from 0 to 62 with a median of 13 nodes. Overall, 189 (41.6%) patients had fewer than 12 nodes removed. Patient age, tumor stage, location and size were associated with lymph node retrieval. Multivariable regression revealed that the aforementioned variables, including gender and hospital type, explained 17% of the observed variance of the lymph node number.
CONCLUSION: Patient and tumor characteristics, although important, are only partly responsible for the variation of lymph node yield. Quality of surgical resection and/or the thoroughness of examination of the tissue by the pathologist might explain the wider proportion of this variance. Training in colorectal node evaluation could help to improve the quality of cancer care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21528668     DOI: 10.1177/030089161109700114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  6 in total

1.  Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Noriko Tanaka; Aya Kuchiba; Katsuhiko Nosho; Mai Yamauchi; Jason L Hornick; Richard S Swanson; Andrew T Chan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Curtis Huttenhower; Deborah Schrag; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Adequate lymph node recovery improves survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Rachel V Stankowski; Jessica M Engel; Suhail A R Doi
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  The complexity of the count: considerations regarding lymph node evaluation in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura J Denham; Justin C Kerstetter; Paul C Herrmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-12

Review 5.  Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Märkl
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Novel predictors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Kwangil Yim; Daeyoun David Won; In Kyu Lee; Seong-Taek Oh; Eun Sun Jung; Sung Hak Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.