Literature DB >> 17019656

A national study on lymph node retrieval in resectional surgery for colorectal cancer.

Paris P Tekkis1, Jason J Smith, Alexander G Heriot, Ara W Darzi, Michael R Thompson, Jeffrey D Stamatakis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to develop a mathematical model for predicting the number of lymph nodes harvested in bowel cancer resection specimens based on the current clinical practice in the United Kingdom.
METHODS: Prospective clinical data were collected from 8,409 newly diagnosed bowel cancer patients presenting to 79 hospitals in Great Britain and Ireland during a variable 12-month period from 2000 to 2002. A two-level hierarchical regression model was used to identify predictors for lymph node harvest. The model was internally validated by comparing observed and model predicted lymph node harvest for patient subgroups.
RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were satisfied by 5,164 patients. The average lymph node harvest was 11.7 nodes with significant between-center variability in lymph node harvest (range, 5.5-21.3 nodes). Increasing age, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, and preoperative radiotherapy were associated with a reduction of lymph node harvest (P < 0.001). Abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and transverse colectomy were the lowest yield procedures for lymph node harvest. Independent predictors of lymph node harvest were age, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, Dukes stage, operative urgency, type of resection, and preoperative radiotherapy. When tested, the model was found to accurately predict lymph node harvest for group statistics (comparison of observed and model predicted lymph node harvest F(1,5154) = 0.63; P = 0.427).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that the minimum number of lymph nodes harvested in colorectal cancer surgery cannot be set at a fixed value. The lymph node harvest model provides a simple tool to the frontline clinician for comparing standards between multidisciplinary bowel cancer teams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17019656     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0691-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  45 in total

1.  Lymph node harvest in colon and rectal cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  James R McDonald; Andrew G Renehan; Sarah T O'Dwyer; Najib Y Haboubi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-27

2.  Ethnicity influences lymph node resection in colon cancer.

Authors:  Molly M Cone; Kelsea M Shoop; Jennifer D Rea; Kim C Lu; Daniel O Herzig
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Can adequate lymphadenectomy be obtained by laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer? Results of a case-control study in 200 patients.

Authors:  Samer Sara; Gilles Poncet; David Voirin; Marie-Hélène Laverriere; Daniel Anglade; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Lymph node yield after colectomy for cancer: is absence of mismatch repair a factor?

Authors:  Tushar Samdani; Molly Schultheis; Zsofia Stadler; Jinru Shia; Tiffany Fancher; Justine Misholy; Martin R Weiser; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Choi; Woon Kyung Jeong; Sang-Woo Lim; Tae Sung Chung; Jung-In Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Byung-Ho Nam; Hee Jin Chang; Seung-Yong Jeong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  T1 colon cancer in the era of screening: risk factors and treatment.

Authors:  F Bianco; S De Franciscis; A Belli; A Falato; R Fusco; D F Altomare; A Amato; C R Asteria; A Avallone; G A Binda; L Boccia; P Buzzo; M Carvello; C Coco; P Delrio; P De Nardi; M Di Lena; A Failla; F La Torre; M La Torre; M Lemma; P Luffarelli; G Manca; I Maretto; F Marino; A Muratore; A Pascariello; S Pucciarelli; D Rega; V Ripetti; G Rizzo; A Serventi; A Spinelli; F Tatangelo; E D L Urso; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Injection of methylene blue solution into the inferior mesenteric artery of resected rectal specimens for rectal cancer as a method for increasing the lymph node harvest.

Authors:  E Klepšytė; N Evaldas Samalavičius
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Non-surgical factors influencing lymph node yield in colon cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Wood; Colin Peirce; Jurgen Mulsow
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-05-15

10.  Who to treat with adjuvant therapy in Dukes B/stage II colorectal cancer? The need for high quality pathology.

Authors:  Eva J A Morris; Nicola J Maughan; David Forman; Philip Quirke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.