Literature DB >> 33281409

Lymph Node Harvest After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer and Its Impact on Oncological Outcomes.

Rajkumar Billakanti1, Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri1, Srikanth Soma1, Hemanth Makineni1, Shirley Sundersingh2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of neoadjuvant treatment on nodal harvest after rectal cancer surgery and its impact on long-term oncological outcomes. A retrospective analysis of patients with rectal cancer who received curative intent treatment from 2002 to 2012 in our institution was performed. Data on various clinic-pathological and treatment details were recovered from the records. The number of nodes harvested after surgery was analyzed. The influence of number of nodes harvested on overall survival and disease free survival was analyzed. Among the 459 patients included in this study, 326 underwent surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The mean number of nodes harvested was significantly lower in patients who received NAT compared with those who did not (8.9 ± 5.77 vs 14 ± 9.84, p < 0.001). However, the mean number of pathologically positive nodes was not significantly different. A minimum of 12 nodes were harvested in only 27.9% of patients who received NAT. No lymph nodes were identified in the specimen in 15 patients (4.6%) who underwent surgery after NAT. The only independent factors influencing harvest of a minimum of 12 nodes were patient age and NAT. The 5-year overall survival was not significantly different in patients in whom < 12 or ≥ 12 nodes were harvested (64% vs 69% respectively, p = 0.5). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation significantly reduces nodal harvest in patients undergoing treatment for rectal cancer. However, this reduced nodal harvest did not adversely impact survival in patients. However, every effort must be made by the surgeon and the pathologist to maximize the nodal harvest. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neoadjuvant chemoradiation; Nodal harvest; Rectal cancer; Surgery; Survival

Year:  2020        PMID: 33281409      PMCID: PMC7714796          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01162-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  19 in total

1.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Arden M Morris; David A Rothenberger; Joel E Tepper
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J E Tepper; M J O'Connell; D Niedzwiecki; D Hollis; C Compton; A B Benson; B Cummings; L Gunderson; J S Macdonald; R J Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a matched case-control study of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Ayyappan Srinivasan; Ritesh Tapkire; Rajaraman Swaminathan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Fewer than 12 lymph nodes can be expected in a surgical specimen after high-dose chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Marks; E B Valsdottir; A A Rather; I C Nweze; D A Newman; M R Chernick
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Identifying stage III colorectal cancer patients: the influence of the patient, surgeon, and pathologist.

Authors:  Eva Judith Ann Morris; Nicola Joanne Maughan; David Forman; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival.

Authors:  Anne Rullier; Christophe Laurent; Maylis Capdepont; Véronique Vendrely; Geneviève Belleannée; Paulette Bioulac-Sage; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Pathologic nodal classification is the most discriminating prognostic factor for disease-free survival in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection.

Authors:  Tae Hyun Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Yong Sang Hong; Sun Young Kim; Ji Won Park; Jae Hwan Oh; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Seung-Yong Jeong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision.

Authors:  P Quirke; P Durdey; M F Dixon; N S Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Role of "Second Look" Lymph Node Search in Harvesting Optimal Number of Lymph Nodes for Staging of Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ameer Hamza; Ramen Sakhi; Sidrah Khawar; Ahmed Alrajjal; Jacob Edens; Muhammad Siddique Khurram; Uqba Khan; Susanna Szpunar; Paul Mazzara
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.