Literature DB >> 24573918

Use of leaf litter breakdown and macroinvertebrates to evaluate gradient of recovery in an acid mine impacted stream remediated with an active alkaline doser.

Kelly S Johnson1, Peter C Thompson, Lori Gromen, Jen Bowman.   

Abstract

The spatial congruence of chemical and biological recovery along an 18-km acid mine impaired stream was examined to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with an alkaline doser. Two methods were used to evaluate biological recovery: the biological structure of the benthic macroinvertebrate community and several ecosystem processing measures (leaf litter breakdown, microbial respiration rates) along the gradient of improved water chemistry. We found that the doser successfully reduced the acidity and lowered dissolved metals (Al, Fe, and Mn), but downstream improvements were not linear. Water chemistry was more variable, and precipitated metals were elevated in a 3-5-km "mixing zone" immediately downstream of the doser, then stabilized into a "recovery zone" 10-18 km below the doser. Macroinvertebrate communities exhibited a longitudinal pattern of recovery, but it did not exactly match the water chemistry gradient Taxonomic richness (number of families) recovered about 6.5 km downstream of the doser, while total abundance and % EPT taxa recovery were incomplete except at the most downstream site, 18 km away. The functional measures of ecosystem processes (leaf litter breakdown, microbial respiration of conditioned leaves, and shredder biomass) closely matched the measures of community structure and also showed a more modest longitudinal trend of biological recovery than expected based on pH and alkalinity. The measures of microbial respiration had added diagnostic value and indicated that biological recovery downstream of the doser is limited by factors other than habitat and acidity/alkalinity, perhaps episodes of AMD and/or impaired energy/nutrient inputs. A better understanding of the factors that govern spatial and temporal variations in acid mine contaminants, especially episodic events, will improve our ability to predict biological recovery after remediation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24573918     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-3684-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  10 in total

1.  An integrative assessment of a watershed impacted by abandoned mined land discharges.

Authors:  D S Cherry; R J Currie; D J Soucek; H A Latimer; G C Trent
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Anthropogenic and natural sources of acidity and metals and their influence on the structure of stream food webs.

Authors:  Kristy L Hogsden; Jon S Harding
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Depauperate macroinvertebrates in a mine affected stream: clean water may be the key to recovery.

Authors:  M Battaglia; G C Hose; E Turak; B Warden
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Development of bioassessment-based benchmarks for iron.

Authors:  Tyler K Linton; Manoel A W Pacheco; Dennis O McIntyre; William H Clement; John Goodrich-Mahoney
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Stream ecosystem response to limestone treatment in acid impacted watersheds of the Allegheny Plateau.

Authors:  Sarah E McClurg; J Todd Petty; Patricia M Mazik; Janet L Clayton
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Variation in ecosystem function in Appalachian streams along an acidity gradient.

Authors:  K S Simon; M A Simon; E F Benfield
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Fungal growth, production, and sporulation during leaf decomposition in two streams.

Authors:  K Suberkropp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Impact of acid mine drainage on benthic communities in streams: the relative roles of substratum vs. aqueous effects.

Authors:  Dean M DeNicol; Michael G Stapleton
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  The impact of episodic coal mine drainage pollution on benthic macroinvertebrates in streams in the Anthracite region of Pennsylvania.

Authors:  A Maccausland; M E McTammany
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  The role of remediation, natural alkalinity sources and physical stream parameters in stream recovery.

Authors:  Natalie A Kruse; Lisa DeRose; Rebekah Korenowsky; Jennifer R Bowman; Dina Lopez; Kelly Johnson; Edward Rankin
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 6.789

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Predicting mayfly recovery in acid mine-impaired streams using logistic regression models of in-stream habitat and water chemistry.

Authors:  Kelly S Johnson; Ed Rankin; Jen Bowman; Jessica Deeds; Natalie Kruse
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Using fatty acids to fingerprint biofilm communities: a means to quickly and accurately assess stream quality.

Authors:  Jared L DeForest; Samuel A Drerup; Morgan L Vis
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Biodiversity mediates the effects of stressors but not nutrients on litter decomposition.

Authors:  Léa Beaumelle; Frederik De Laender; Nico Eisenhauer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Assessment of Impacts of Coal Mining in the Region of Sydney, Australia on the Aquatic Environment Using Macroinvertebrates and Chlorophyll as Indicators.

Authors:  Aal-E Ali; Daniel R Sloane; Vladimir Strezov
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.