Literature DB >> 17555220

Stream ecosystem response to limestone treatment in acid impacted watersheds of the Allegheny Plateau.

Sarah E McClurg1, J Todd Petty, Patricia M Mazik, Janet L Clayton.   

Abstract

Restoration programs are expanding worldwide, but assessments of restoration effectiveness are rare. The objectives of our study were to assess current acid-precipitation remediation programs in streams of the Allegheny Plateau ecoregion of West Virginia (USA), identify specific attributes that could and could not be fully restored, and quantify temporal trends in ecosystem recovery. We sampled water chemistry, physical habitat, periphyton biomass, and benthic macroinvertebrate and fish community structure in three stream types: acidic (four streams), naturally circumneutral (eight streams), and acidic streams treated with limestone sand (eight streams). We observed no temporal trends in ecosystem recovery in treated streams despite sampling streams that ranged from 2 to 20 years since initial treatment. Our results indicated that the application of limestone sand to acidic streams was effective in fully recovering some characteristics, such as pH, alkalinity, Ca2+, Ca:H ratios, trout biomass and density, and trout reproductive success. However, recovery of many other characteristics was strongly dependent upon spatial proximity to treatment, and still others were never fully recovered. For example, limestone treatment did not restore dissolved aluminum concentrations, macroinvertebrate taxon richness, and total fish biomass to circumneutral reference conditions. Full recovery may not be occurring because treated streams continue to drain acidic watersheds and remain isolated in a network of acidic streams. We propose a revised stream restoration plan for the Allegheny Plateau that includes restoring stream ecosystems as connected networks rather than isolated reaches and recognizes that full recovery of acidified watersheds may not be possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17555220     DOI: 10.1890/06-0392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating expected outcomes of acid remediation in an intensively mined Appalachian watershed.

Authors:  Andrew S Watson; George T Merovich; J Todd Petty; J Brady Gutta
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Long-term chemical and biological improvement in an acid mine drainage-impacted watershed.

Authors:  Bruce E Underwood; Natalie A Kruse; Jennifer R Bowman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Use of leaf litter breakdown and macroinvertebrates to evaluate gradient of recovery in an acid mine impacted stream remediated with an active alkaline doser.

Authors:  Kelly S Johnson; Peter C Thompson; Lori Gromen; Jen Bowman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  More than a corridor: use of a main stem stream as supplemental foraging habitat by a brook trout metapopulation.

Authors:  Brock M Huntsman; J Todd Petty; Shikha Sharma; Eric R Merriam
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Combining a Spatial Model and Demand Forecasts to Map Future Surface Coal Mining in Appalachia.

Authors:  Michael P Strager; Jacquelyn M Strager; Jeffrey S Evans; Judy K Dunscomb; Brad J Kreps; Aaron E Maxwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Density-dependent regulation of brook trout population dynamics along a core-periphery distribution gradient in a central Appalachian watershed.

Authors:  Brock M Huntsman; J Todd Petty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.