Literature DB >> 19688923

Variation in ecosystem function in Appalachian streams along an acidity gradient.

K S Simon1, M A Simon, E F Benfield.   

Abstract

Acidification is a widespread phenomenon that damages aquatic systems, and it has been the focus of intensive management efforts. While most management has focused on community structure as an endpoint, ecosystem function is also sensitive to acidification and important in stream health. We examined how a key ecosystem function in streams, leaf breakdown, varied along a gradient of pH resulting from acid deposition, natural conditions, and liming. We also measured how invertebrate and microbial assemblage structure and microbial function were related to altered leaf breakdown rates. Leaf breakdown rates declined more than threefold along a gradient of stream acidity from pH 6.8 to 4.9. The diversity of leaf-shredding invertebrates, bacteria, and fungi showed little response to variation in pH. The abundance of one acid-sensitive caddisfly, Lepidostoma, declined with acidification, and Lepidostoma abundance explained 37% of the variation in leaf breakdown rates among sites. Microbial respiration was suppressed along the acidity gradient, although the pattern was weaker than that for breakdown rate. In short-term laboratory incubations, microbes at acidic and circumneutral sites demonstrated adaptation to ambient pH. The activity of microbial extracellular enzymes was strongly influenced by pH. In particular, the pattern of activity of phosphatase indicated increasing P limitation of microbes with increasing acidification. Our results show that leaf breakdown is a sensitive tool for examining the response of stream function to acidification and also for defining the mechanisms that drive functional response. Future management efforts should focus on key taxa that are particularly sensitive and effective at shredding leaves and also the role of shifting acidity in mediating the availability of phosphorus to microbial films that are important for stream function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19688923     DOI: 10.1890/08-0571.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Impaired leaf litter processing in acidified streams : learning from microbial enzyme activities.

Authors:  Hugues Clivot; Michael Danger; Christophe Pagnout; Philippe Wagner; Philippe Rousselle; Pascal Poupin; François Guérold
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Effects of particulate matter (PM2.5) and associated acidity on ecosystem functioning: response of leaf litter breakdown.

Authors:  Wenting Wu; Yixin Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Use of leaf litter breakdown and macroinvertebrates to evaluate gradient of recovery in an acid mine impacted stream remediated with an active alkaline doser.

Authors:  Kelly S Johnson; Peter C Thompson; Lori Gromen; Jen Bowman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Stream microbial diversity in response to environmental changes: review and synthesis of existing research.

Authors:  Lydia H Zeglin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Assessing impacts of unconventional natural gas extraction on microbial communities in headwater stream ecosystems in Northwestern Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Ryan Trexler; Caroline Solomon; Colin J Brislawn; Justin R Wright; Abigail Rosenberger; Erin E McClure; Alyssa M Grube; Mark P Peterson; Mehdi Keddache; Olivia U Mason; Terry C Hazen; Christopher J Grant; Regina Lamendella
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Composition of riparian litter input regulates organic matter decomposition: Implications for headwater stream functioning in a managed forest landscape.

Authors:  Johan Lidman; Micael Jonsson; Ryan M Burrows; Mirco Bundschuh; Ryan A Sponseller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.