Frank Hofheinz1, Ivayla Apostolova2, Liane Oehme3, Jörg Kotzerke3, Jörg van den Hoff4,3. 1. Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany f.hofheinz@hzdr.de. 2. Klinik für Radiologie Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Germany; and. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 4. Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.
Abstract
Quantitative assessment of radio- and chemotherapy response with 18F-FDG whole-body PET has attracted increasing interest in recent years. In most published work, SUV has been used for this purpose. In the context of therapy response assessment, the reliability of lesion SUVs, notably their test-retest stability, thus becomes crucial. However, a recent study demonstrated substantial test-retest variability (TRV) in SUVs. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the tumor-to-blood SUV ratio (SUR) can improve TRV in tracer uptake. Methods: 73 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer from the prospective multicenter trials ACRIN 6678 (n = 34) and MK-0646-008 (n = 39) were included in this study. All patients underwent two 18F-FDG PET/CT investigations on two different days (time difference, 3.6 ± 2.1 d; range, 1-7 d) before therapy. For each patient, up to 7 tumor lesions were evaluated. For each lesion, SUVmax and SUVpeak were determined. Blood SUV was determined as the mean value of a 3-dimensional aortic region of interest that was delineated on the attenuation CT image and transferred to the PET image. SURs were computed as the ratio of tumor SUV to blood SUV and were uptake time-corrected to 75 min after injection. TRV was quantified as 1.96 multiplied by the root-mean-square deviation of the fractional paired differences in SUV and SUR. The combined effect of blood normalization and uptake time correction was inspected by considering RTRV (TRVSUR/TRVSUV), a ratio reflecting the reduction in the TRV in SUR relative to SUV. RTRV was correlated with the group-averaged-value difference (δ) in CFmean (δCFmean) of the quantity δCF = |CF - 1|, where CF is the numeric factor that converts individual ratios of paired SUVs into corresponding SURs. This correlation analysis was performed by successively increasing a threshold value δCFmin and computing δCFmean and RTRV for the remaining subgroup of patients/lesions with δCF ≥ δCFmin Results: The group-averaged TRVSUV and TRVSUR were 32.1 and 29.0, respectively, which correspond to a reduction of variability in SUR by an RTRV factor of 0.9 in comparison to SUV. This rather marginal improvement can be understood to be a consequence of the atypically low intrasubject variability in blood SUV and uptake time and the accordingly small δCF values in the investigated prospective study groups. In fact, subgroup analysis with increasing δCFmin thresholds revealed a pronounced negative correlation (Spearman ρ = -0.99, P < 0.001) between RTRV and δCFmean, where RTRV ≈ 0.4 in the δCFmin = 20% subgroup, corresponding to a more than 2-fold reduction of TRVSUR compared with TRVSUV Conclusion: Variability in blood SUV and uptake time has been identified as a causal factor in the TRV in lesion SUV. Therefore, TRV in lesion uptake measurements can be reduced by replacing SUV with SUR as the uptake measure. The improvement becomes substantial for the level of variability in blood SUV and uptake time typically observed in the clinical context.
Quantitative assessment of radio- and chemotherapy response with 18F-FDG whole-body PET has attracted increasing interest in recent years. In most published work, SUV has been used for this purpose. In the context of therapy response assessment, the reliability of lesion SUVs, notably their test-retest stability, thus becomes crucial. However, a recent study demonstrated substantial test-retest variability (TRV) in SUVs. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the tumor-to-blood SUV ratio (SUR) can improve TRV in tracer uptake. Methods: 73 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer from the prospective multicenter trials ACRIN 6678 (n = 34) and MK-0646-008 (n = 39) were included in this study. All patients underwent two 18F-FDG PET/CT investigations on two different days (time difference, 3.6 ± 2.1 d; range, 1-7 d) before therapy. For each patient, up to 7tumor lesions were evaluated. For each lesion, SUVmax and SUVpeak were determined. Blood SUV was determined as the mean value of a 3-dimensional aortic region of interest that was delineated on the attenuation CT image and transferred to the PET image. SURs were computed as the ratio of tumor SUV to blood SUV and were uptake time-corrected to 75 min after injection. TRV was quantified as 1.96 multiplied by the root-mean-square deviation of the fractional paired differences in SUV and SUR. The combined effect of blood normalization and uptake time correction was inspected by considering RTRV (TRVSUR/TRVSUV), a ratio reflecting the reduction in the TRV in SUR relative to SUV. RTRV was correlated with the group-averaged-value difference (δ) in CFmean (δCFmean) of the quantity δCF = |CF - 1|, where CF is the numeric factor that converts individual ratios of paired SUVs into corresponding SURs. This correlation analysis was performed by successively increasing a threshold value δCFmin and computing δCFmean and RTRV for the remaining subgroup of patients/lesions with δCF ≥ δCFmin Results: The group-averaged TRVSUV and TRVSUR were 32.1 and 29.0, respectively, which correspond to a reduction of variability in SUR by an RTRV factor of 0.9 in comparison to SUV. This rather marginal improvement can be understood to be a consequence of the atypically low intrasubject variability in blood SUV and uptake time and the accordingly small δCF values in the investigated prospective study groups. In fact, subgroup analysis with increasing δCFmin thresholds revealed a pronounced negative correlation (Spearman ρ = -0.99, P < 0.001) between RTRV and δCFmean, where RTRV ≈ 0.4 in the δCFmin = 20% subgroup, corresponding to a more than 2-fold reduction of TRVSUR compared with TRVSUV Conclusion: Variability in blood SUV and uptake time has been identified as a causal factor in the TRV in lesion SUV. Therefore, TRV in lesion uptake measurements can be reduced by replacing SUV with SUR as the uptake measure. The improvement becomes substantial for the level of variability in blood SUV and uptake time typically observed in the clinical context.
Authors: Evangelia Skoura; Ioannis E Datseris; Ioannis Platis; Georgios Oikonomopoulos; Konstantinos N Syrigos Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: F Hofheinz; C Pötzsch; L Oehme; B Beuthien-Baumann; J Steinbach; J Kotzerke; J van den Hoff Journal: Nuklearmedizin Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 1.379
Authors: Raef R Boktor; Gregory Walker; Roderick Stacey; Samuel Gledhill; Alexander G Pitman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jörg van den Hoff; Alexandr Lougovski; Georg Schramm; Jens Maus; Liane Oehme; Jan Petr; Bettina Beuthien-Baumann; Jörg Kotzerke; Frank Hofheinz Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Jörg van den Hoff; Liane Oehme; Georg Schramm; Jens Maus; Alexandr Lougovski; Jan Petr; Bettina Beuthien-Baumann; Frank Hofheinz Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2013-11-23 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Frank Hofheinz; Jörg van den Hoff; Ingo G Steffen; Alexandr Lougovski; Kilian Ego; Holger Amthauer; Ivayla Apostolova Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Frank Hofheinz; Rebecca Bütof; Ivayla Apostolova; Klaus Zöphel; Ingo G Steffen; Holger Amthauer; Jörg Kotzerke; Michael Baumann; Jörg van den Hoff Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Brenda F Kurland; Lanell M Peterson; Andrew T Shields; Jean H Lee; Darrin W Byrd; Alena Novakova-Jiresova; Mark Muzi; Jennifer M Specht; David A Mankoff; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M Popovic; O Talarico; J van den Hoff; H Kunin; Z Zhang; D Lafontaine; S Dogan; J Leung; E Kaye; C Czmielewski; M E Mayerhoefer; P Zanzonico; R Yaeger; H Schöder; J L Humm; S B Solomon; C T Sofocleous; A S Kirov Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Denis R Beckford-Vera; Robert R Flavell; Youngho Seo; Enrique Martinez-Ortiz; Maya Aslam; Cassandra Thanh; Emily Fehrman; Marion Pardons; Shreya Kumar; Amelia N Deitchman; Vahid Ravanfar; Brailee Schulte; I-Wei Katherine Wu; Tony Pan; Jacqueline D Reeves; Christopher C Nixon; Nikita S Iyer; Leonel Torres; Sadie E Munter; Tony Hyunh; Christos J Petropoulos; Rebecca Hoh; Benjamin L Franc; Lucio Gama; Richard A Koup; John R Mascola; Nicolas Chomont; Steven G Deeks; Henry F VanBrocklin; Timothy J Henrich Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Jan Petr; Louise Hogeboom; Pavel Nikulin; Evita Wiegers; Gwen Schroyen; Jesper Kallehauge; Marek Chmelík; Patricia Clement; Ruben E Nechifor; Liviu-Andrei Fodor; Philip C De Witt Hamer; Frederik Barkhof; Cyril Pernet; Maarten Lequin; Sabine Deprez; Radim Jančálek; Henk J M M Mutsaerts; Francesca B Pizzini; Kyrre E Emblem; Vera C Keil Journal: MAGMA Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Rebecca Bütof; Frank Hofheinz; Klaus Zöphel; Julia Schmollack; Christina Jentsch; Sebastian Zschaeck; Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff; Michael Baumann Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jens Maus; Frank Hofheinz; Ivayla Apostolova; Michael C Kreissl; Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Pavel Nikulin; Frank Hofheinz; Jens Maus; Yimin Li; Rebecca Bütof; Catharina Lange; Christian Furth; Sebastian Zschaeck; Michael C Kreissl; Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 9.236