Literature DB >> 22743179

Temporal variability of the N2pc during efficient and inefficient visual search.

Jarrod R Dowdall1, Artur Luczak, Matthew S Tata.   

Abstract

Efficient and inefficient visual search are characterized by the difference in the time required to find the target. Efficient "popout" search time is relatively unaffected by increases in the number of search items, whereas inefficient "non-popout" search time requires more time increases in duration. Electrophysiological investigations of the neural correlates of visual search have revealed a component of the event-related potential (ERP) known as the N2pc. The N2pc is thought to reflect the orienting of attention to the target during visual search. If the N2pc is more closely associated in time with the moment of target selection than the onset of the search display, it may be predicted that the N2pc would be delayed or more temporally variable during inefficient compared to efficient visual search. In the present study, we contrasted efficient "popout" search with inefficient "non-popout" search to investigate the hypothesis that the N2pc is temporally associated with the moment of search completion, and this would be reflected as a delayed or attenuated N2pc during non-popout search compared to popout. In Experiment 1, we observed a robust N2pc during popout search, but not during non-popout search. However, sorting trials by the N2pc latency recovered the N2pc during non-popout search. In Experiment 2 we replicated this observation and demonstrated that popout and non-popout search reflected differences in the temporal variability of the N2pc latency. Further investigation using time-spectral analysis suggests that evoked posterior-contralateral theta (4-6 Hz) underlies the N2pc during both popout and non-popout search.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22743179     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.

Authors:  David R Painter; Paul E Dux; Susan L Travis; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Joshua J Foster; David W Sutterer; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Inefficient visual search strategies in the first-episode schizophrenia spectrum.

Authors:  Alfredo L Sklar; Brian A Coffman; Gretchen Haas; Avniel Ghuman; Raymond Cho; Dean F Salisbury
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Asymmetry of automatic change detection shown by the visual mismatch negativity: an additional feature is identified faster than missing features.

Authors:  István Czigler; István Sulykos; Krisztina Kecskés-Kovács
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

6.  Electroencephalographic Theta-Band Oscillatory Dynamics Represent Attentional Bias to Subjective Preferences in Value-Based Decisions.

Authors:  Liuting Diao; Wenping Li; Wuke Zhang; Qingguo Ma; Jia Jin
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2021-02-15

7.  Joint control of visually guided actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling.

Authors:  David R Painter; Jeffrey J Kim; Angela I Renton; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-29

8.  Dynamics of distraction: competition among auditory streams modulates gain and disrupts inter-trial phase coherence in the human electroencephalogram.

Authors:  Karla D Ponjavic-Conte; Dillon A Hambrook; Sebastian Pavlovic; Matthew S Tata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Theta Oscillation Reveals the Temporal Involvement of Different Attentional Networks in Contingent Reorienting.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Chang; Wei-Kuang Liang; Chiou-Lian Lai; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Reduced visual attention in heterogeneous textures is reflected in occipital alpha and theta band activity.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Makoto Miyakoshi; Marco Alessandro Petilli; Anna Schubö; Scott Makeig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.