Literature DB >> 21643945

2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms.

Torsten Hopp1, Pascal Baltzer, Matthias Dietzel, Werner A Kaiser, Nicole V Ruiter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. The established screening method to detect breast cancer is X-ray mammography. Additionally, MRI is used for diagnosis in clinical routine. Due to complementary diagnostic information, both modalities are often read in combination. Yet, the correlation is challenging due to different dimensionality of images and different patient positioning. In this paper, we describe a method to fuse X-ray mammograms with DCE-MRI. The present study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of the approach.
METHODS: For the combination of information from both modalities, the images have to be registered using a compression simulation based on a patient-specific biomechanical model. The registered images can be compared directly. The contrast enhancement in the DCE-MRI volume is evaluated using parametric enhancement maps. A projection image of the contrast enhancement is created. The image fusion combines it with X-ray mammograms for intuitive multimodal diagnosis.
RESULTS: The image fusion was evaluated using 11 clinical datasets. For 10 of 11 datasets, a good accuracy of the image registration was achieved. The overlap of contrast-enhanced regions with marked lesions in the mammogram is 61%. Lesions are clearly differentiable from surrounding tissue by the DCE-MRI projection in 10 of 11 cases.
CONCLUSION: The described preliminary results are promising, thus we expect the visualization of quantitative information from dynamic MRI together with mammograms to be beneficial for multimodal diagnosis. Because of the use of clinical standard modalities, no additional image acquisition is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643945     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-011-0623-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  16 in total

1.  Robotic system for biopsy and therapy of breast lesions in a high-field whole-body magnetic resonance tomography unit.

Authors:  W A Kaiser; H Fischer; J Vagner; M Selig
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Active contours without edges.

Authors:  T F Chan; L A Vese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.

Authors:  Pascal Andreas Thomas Baltzer; Christian Freiberg; Sebastian Beger; Tibor Vag; Matthias Dietzel; Aimee B Herzog; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Digital mammography: an update.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; M Fuchsjäger; T Wacker; K-P Hermann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution.

Authors:  H Degani; V Gusis; D Weinstein; S Fields; S Strano
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data.

Authors:  C P Behrenbruch; K Marias; P A Armitage; M Yam; N R Moore; R E English; P J Clarke; F J Leong; J M Brady
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data.

Authors:  Christian P Behrenbruch; Kostas Marias; Paul A Armitage; Margaret Yam; Niall Moore; Ruth E English; Jane Clarke; Michael Brady
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 9.  Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto; Petra Macaskill; Sarah J Lord; Ruth M Warren; J Michael Dixon; Les Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  A review of current evidence-based clinical applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Wendy DeMartini; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  A Standard Mammography Unit - Standard 3D Ultrasound Probe Fusion Prototype: First Results.

Authors:  Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Sebastian M Jud; Peter A Fasching; Arndt Hartmann; Marcus Radicke; Claudia Rauh; Michael Uder; Marius Wunderle; Paul Gass; Hanna Langemann; Matthias W Beckmann; Julius Emons
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  [Future of mammography-based imaging].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; T Wittenberg; T Michel; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann; C Rauh; S M Jud; B Brehm; M Meier-Meitinger; G Anton; M Uder; P A Fasching
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Identification of Breast Cancer Using Integrated Information from MRI and Mammography.

Authors:  Shih-Neng Yang; Fang-Jing Li; Yen-Hsiu Liao; Yueh-Sheng Chen; Wu-Chung Shen; Tzung-Chi Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.