PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to optimize the 3-dimensional (3D) fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequence for isotropic high-spatial-resolution imaging of white matter (WM) and cortical lesions at 7 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We added a magnetization-prepared (MP) FLAIR module to a Cube 3D fast spin echo sequence and optimized the refocusing flip angle train using extended phase graph simulations, taking into account image contrast, specific absorption rate (SAR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as T1/T2 values of the different species of interest (WM, grey matter, lesions) at 7 T. We also effected improved preparation homogeneity at 7 T by redesigning the refocusing pulse used in the MP segments. Two sets of refocusing flip angle trains-(a) an SNR-optimal and (b) a contrast-optimal set-were derived and used to scan 7 patients with Alzheimer disease/cognitive impairment and 7 patients with multiple sclerosis. Conventional constant refocusing flip MP-FLAIR images were also acquired for comparison. Lesion SNR, contrast, and lesion count were compared between the 2 optimized and the standard FLAIR sequences. RESULTS: Whole brain coverage with 0.8 mm isotropic spatial resolution in ∼5-minute scan times was achieved using the optimized 3D FLAIR sequences at clinically acceptable SAR levels. The SNR efficiency of the SNR-optimal sequence was significantly better than that of conventional constant refocusing flip MP-FLAIR sequence, whereas the scan time was reduced more than 2-fold (∼5 vs >10 minutes). The contrast efficiency of the contrast-optimal sequence was comparable with that of the constant refocusing flip sequence. Lesion load ascertained by lesion counting was not significantly different among the sequences. CONCLUSION: Magnetization-prepared FLAIR-Cube with refocusing flip angle trains optimized for SNR and contrast can be used to characterize WM and cortical lesions at 7 T with 0.8 mm isotropic resolution in short scan times and without SAR penalty.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to optimize the 3-dimensional (3D) fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequence for isotropic high-spatial-resolution imaging of white matter (WM) and cortical lesions at 7 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We added a magnetization-prepared (MP) FLAIR module to a Cube 3D fast spin echo sequence and optimized the refocusing flip angle train using extended phase graph simulations, taking into account image contrast, specific absorption rate (SAR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as T1/T2 values of the different species of interest (WM, grey matter, lesions) at 7 T. We also effected improved preparation homogeneity at 7 T by redesigning the refocusing pulse used in the MP segments. Two sets of refocusing flip angle trains-(a) an SNR-optimal and (b) a contrast-optimal set-were derived and used to scan 7 patients with Alzheimer disease/cognitive impairment and 7 patients with multiple sclerosis. Conventional constant refocusing flip MP-FLAIR images were also acquired for comparison. Lesion SNR, contrast, and lesion count were compared between the 2 optimized and the standard FLAIR sequences. RESULTS: Whole brain coverage with 0.8 mm isotropic spatial resolution in ∼5-minute scan times was achieved using the optimized 3D FLAIR sequences at clinically acceptable SAR levels. The SNR efficiency of the SNR-optimal sequence was significantly better than that of conventional constant refocusing flip MP-FLAIR sequence, whereas the scan time was reduced more than 2-fold (∼5 vs >10 minutes). The contrast efficiency of the contrast-optimal sequence was comparable with that of the constant refocusing flip sequence. Lesion load ascertained by lesion counting was not significantly different among the sequences. CONCLUSION: Magnetization-prepared FLAIR-Cube with refocusing flip angle trains optimized for SNR and contrast can be used to characterize WM and cortical lesions at 7 T with 0.8 mm isotropic resolution in short scan times and without SAR penalty.
Authors: Subhendra N Sarkar; David C Alsop; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Reed F Busse; Philip M Robson; Neil M Rofsky; David B Hackney Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M M A Conijn; M I Geerlings; G-J Biessels; T Takahara; T D Witkamp; J J M Zwanenburg; P R Luijten; J Hendrikse Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Wolter L de Graaf; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; Fredy Visser; Mike P Wattjes; Petra J W Pouwels; Jeroen J G Geurts; Chris H Polman; Frederik Barkhof; Peter R Luijten; Jonas A Castelijns Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Crombé; M Saranathan; A Ruet; M Durieux; E de Roquefeuil; J C Ouallet; B Brochet; V Dousset; T Tourdias Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Vincent Planche; Jason H Su; Sandy Mournet; Manojkumar Saranathan; Vincent Dousset; May Han; Brian K Rutt; Thomas Tourdias Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: E Bartolini; M Cosottini; M Costagli; C Barba; L Tassi; R Spreafico; R Garbelli; L Biagi; A Buccoliero; F Giordano; R Guerrini Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mikhail Milchenko; Scott A Norris; Kathleen Poston; Meghan C Campbell; Mwiza Ushe; Joel S Perlmutter; Abraham Z Snyder Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-01-08