BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detection of microbleeds differs strongly between studies, due to differences in scan protocol. This study aims to compare the visualization of microbleeds with 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T with 3D dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (29 male; mean age, 58 ± 12 years) with atherosclerotic disease from the Second Manifestations of ARTerial Disease study were included. 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T and dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T were done in all patients. The presence and number of definite microbleeds were recorded on minimal intensity projections. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen κ test and the ICC. The difference in presence and number of microbleeds was tested with the McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The interobserver ICC at 7T was 0.61 and the intraobserver ICC was 0.94, whereas at 1.5T the interobserver ICC was 0.50 and the intraobserver ICC was 0.59. Microbleeds were detected in significantly more patients on 7T (50%) than on 1.5T scans (21%) (P = .001). The number of microbleeds was also higher at 7T (median, 0.5; range, 0-5) than on 1.5T (median, 0.0; range, 0-6) (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: 3D dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T results in better and more reliable detection of microbleeds compared with 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detection of microbleeds differs strongly between studies, due to differences in scan protocol. This study aims to compare the visualization of microbleeds with 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T with 3D dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (29 male; mean age, 58 ± 12 years) with atherosclerotic disease from the Second Manifestations of ARTerial Disease study were included. 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T and dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T were done in all patients. The presence and number of definite microbleeds were recorded on minimal intensity projections. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen κ test and the ICC. The difference in presence and number of microbleeds was tested with the McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The interobserver ICC at 7T was 0.61 and the intraobserver ICC was 0.94, whereas at 1.5T the interobserver ICC was 0.50 and the intraobserver ICC was 0.59. Microbleeds were detected in significantly more patients on 7T (50%) than on 1.5T scans (21%) (P = .001). The number of microbleeds was also higher at 7T (median, 0.5; range, 0-5) than on 1.5T (median, 0.0; range, 0-6) (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: 3D dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T results in better and more reliable detection of microbleeds compared with 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T.
Authors: Tom Jeerakathil; Philip A Wolf; Alexa Beiser; John K Hald; Rhoda Au; Carlos S Kase; Joseph M Massaro; Charles DeCarli Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S M Gregoire; H R Jäger; T A Yousry; C Kallis; M M Brown; D J Werring Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: F Fazekas; R Kleinert; G Roob; G Kleinert; P Kapeller; R Schmidt; H P Hartung Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Wolff Kirsch; Grant McAuley; Barbara Holshouser; Floyd Petersen; Muhammad Ayaz; Harry V Vinters; Cindy Dickson; E Mark Haacke; William Britt; James Larseng; Ivan Kim; Claudius Mueller; Matthew Schrag; Daniel Kido Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: M W Vernooij; A van der Lugt; M A Ikram; P A Wielopolski; W J Niessen; A Hofman; G P Krestin; M M B Breteler Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J de Bresser; M Brundel; M M Conijn; J J van Dillen; M I Geerlings; M A Viergever; P R Luijten; G J Biessels Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E Cavedo; S Lista; Z Khachaturian; P Aisen; P Amouyel; K Herholz; C R Jack; R Sperling; J Cummings; K Blennow; S O'Bryant; G B Frisoni; A Khachaturian; M Kivipelto; W Klunk; K Broich; S Andrieu; M Thiebaut de Schotten; J-F Mangin; A A Lammertsma; K Johnson; S Teipel; A Drzezga; A Bokde; O Colliot; H Bakardjian; H Zetterberg; B Dubois; B Vellas; L S Schneider; H Hampel Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014-12
Authors: Manojkumar Saranathan; Thomas Tourdias; Adam B Kerr; Jeff D Bernstein; Geoffrey A Kerchner; May H Han; Brian K Rutt Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: A De Ciantis; A J Barkovich; M Cosottini; C Barba; D Montanaro; M Costagli; M Tosetti; L Biagi; W B Dobyns; R Guerrini Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Anne F Wiegman; Irene B Meier; Nicole Schupf; Jennifer J Manly; Vanessa A Guzman; Atul Narkhede; Yaakov Stern; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Anand Viswanathan; José A Luchsinger; Steven M Greenberg; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: J Kuchling; T Sinnecker; I Bozin; J Dörr; V I Madai; J Sobesky; T Niendorf; F Paul; J Wuerfel Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.214