Literature DB >> 24562649

Treatment outcomes of patients with cervical cancer with complete metabolic responses after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Cem Onal1, Mehmet Reyhan, Ozan C Guler, Ali Fuat Yapar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate failure patterns and prognostic factors predictive of recurrences and survival in cervical cancer patients who are treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (ChRT), who have a subsequent complete metabolic response (CMR) with (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) after treatment.
METHODS: The records of 152 cervical cancer patients who were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy were evaluated. All patients underwent pre-treatment positron emission tomography (PET-CT), and post-treatment PET-CT was performed within a median of 3.9 months (range, 3.0-9.8 months) after the completion of ChRT. The prognoses of partial response/progressive disease (PR/PD) cases (30 patients, 18 %) and CMR cases (122 patients, %82) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analysis effecting the treatment outcome was performed in CMR cases.
RESULTS: The median follow-ups for all patients and surviving patients were 28.7 (range, 3.3-78.7 months) and 33.2 months (range, 6.23-78.7 months), respectively. Four-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in patients with CMR compared to patients with PR/PD (66.9 % vs. 12.4 %, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with PR/PD had higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary cervical tumor (26.4 ± 10.1 vs. 15.9 ± 6.3; p < 0.001) and larger tumor (6.4 cm ± 2.3 cm vs. 5.0 cm ± 1.4 cm; p < 0.001) compared to patients with CMR. Of the 122 patients with post-treatment CMRs, 25 (21 %) developed local, locoregional, or distant failure. In univariate analysis, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, 'International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' (FIGO) stage ≥ IIB, and pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastasis were predictive of both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), while histology was predictive of only OS. In multivariate analysis, tumor size, stage and lymph node metastasis were predictive of OS and DFS.
CONCLUSION: Although CMR is associated with better outcomes, relapses remain problematic, especially in patients with bulky tumors (≥ 5 cm), extensive stage (≥ IIB) or pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastasis. These findings could support the need for more aggressive treatment or adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24562649     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2719-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  26 in total

1.  Posttherapy surveillance monitoring of cervical cancer by FDG-PET.

Authors:  Perry W Grigsby; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; David G Mutch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Metabolic response on post-therapy FDG-PET predicts patterns of failure after radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Julie K Schwarz; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Cervical cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin E Greer; Wui-Jin Koh; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Sachin M Apte; Susana M Campos; John Chan; Kathleen R Cho; Larry Copeland; Marta Ann Crispens; Nefertiti Dupont; Patricia J Eifel; David K Gaffney; Warner K Huh; Daniel S Kapp; John R Lurain; Lainie Martin; Mark A Morgan; Robert J Morgan; David Mutch; Steven W Remmenga; R Kevin Reynolds; William Small; Nelson Teng; Fidel A Valea
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Preoperative staging of cervical cancer: is 18-FDG-PET/CT really effective in patients with early stage disease?

Authors:  Mauro Signorelli; Luca Guerra; Luca Montanelli; Cinzia Crivellaro; Alessandro Buda; Tiziana Dell'Anna; Maria Picchio; Rodolfo Milani; Robert Fruscio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer.

Authors:  L Elit; A W Fyles; T K Oliver; M C Devries-Aboud; M Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Julie K Schwarz; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Survival of cervical cancer patients in Germany in the early 21st century: a period analysis by age, histology, and stage.

Authors:  Tianhui Chen; Lina Jansen; Adam Gondos; Katharina Emrich; Bernd Holleczek; Sabine Luttmann; Annika Waldmann; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.

Authors:  Patricia J Eifel; Kathryn Winter; Mitchell Morris; Charles Levenback; Perry W Grigsby; Jay Cooper; Marvin Rotman; David Gershenson; David G Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome.

Authors:  Perry W Grigsby; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Janet Rader; Imran Zoberi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  12 in total

1.  Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018.

Authors:  Lucia Manganaro; Yulia Lakhman; Nishat Bharwani; Benedetta Gui; Silvia Gigli; Valeria Vinci; Stefania Rizzo; Aki Kido; Teresa Margarida Cunha; Evis Sala; Andrea Rockall; Rosemarie Forstner; Stephanie Nougaret
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Radiotherapy response evaluation using FDG PET-CT-established and emerging applications.

Authors:  Helen Cliffe; Chirag Patel; Robin Prestwich; Andrew Scarsbrook
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Pretreatment metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis are not independent prognosticators for locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Ozan Cem Guler; Nese Torun; Berna Akkus Yildirim; Cem Onal
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The feasibility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography(PSMA PET/CT)-guided radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  O C Guler; B Engels; C Onal; H Everaert; R Van den Begin; T Gevaert; M de Ridder
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Imaging Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsy in Assessment of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Mansur A Ghani; Joy Liau; Ramez Eskander; Loren Mell; Tahir Yusufaly; Sebastian Obrzut
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.081

6.  A preliminary investigation into textural features of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity in (18)F-FDG PET for overall survival prognosis in patients with bulky cervical cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Kung-Chu Ho; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Tzu-Chen Yen; Tsung-Ying Ho; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Ji-Hong Hong; Yi-Ting Huang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-07-06

Review 7.  What's New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer?

Authors:  Sairah R Khan; Mubarik Arshad; Kathryn Wallitt; Victoria Stewart; Nishat Bharwani; Tara D Barwick
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Prediction of treatment response in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer using midtreatment PET/MRI during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In regard to Vojtíšek et al.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Guler Yavas; Cagdas Yavas
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation Following a Complete Metabolic Response.

Authors:  A J Lin; F Dehdashti; L S Massad; P H Thaker; M A Powell; D G Mutch; J K Schwarz; S Markovina; B A Siegel; P W Grigsby
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Andrew Scarsbrook; Sriram Vaidyanathan; Fahmid Chowdhury; Sarah Swift; Rachel Cooper; Chirag Patel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.