Literature DB >> 20567627

Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer.

L Elit1, A W Fyles, T K Oliver, M C Devries-Aboud, M Fung-Kee-Fung.   

Abstract

QUESTION: What is the most appropriate follow-up strategy for patients with cervical cancer who are clinically disease-free after receiving primary treatment? PERSPECTIVES: For women with cervical cancer who have been treated with curative intent, follow-up includes identification of complications related to treatment and intervention in the event of recurrent disease. Most women who recur with cervical cancer are not curable; however, early identification of recurrence can alter disease management or treatment-planning options, and for those with a central pelvic recurrence and no evidence of distant disease, there is a potential for cure with additional therapy. Follow-up protocols in this population are variable, using a number of tests at a variety of intervals with questionable outcomes. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest included recurrence, survival, and quality of life.
METHODOLOGY: The Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group (DSG) conducted a systematic review of the literature and a narrative review of emerging clinical issues to inform the most appropriate follow-up strategy for patients with cervical cancer. The evidence was insufficient to specify a clinically useful recommended follow-up schedule, and therefore, the expert consensus opinion of the Gynecology Cancer DSG was used to develop recommendations on patient surveillance. The resulting recommendations were reviewed and approved by the Gynecology Cancer DSG and by the Program in Evidence-Based Care Report Approval Panel. An external review by Ontario practitioners completed the final phase of the review process. Feedback from all parties was incorporated to create the final practice guideline.
RESULTS: The systematic review of the literature identified seventeen retrospective studies. The Gynecology Cancer DSG used a consensus process to develop recommendations based on the available evidence from the systematic review, the narrative review, and the collective clinical experience and judgment of the DSG members. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: The recommendations in this practice guideline are based on the expert consensus opinion of the Gynecology Cancer DSG, informed by evidence from retrospective studies. These are some general features of an appropriate follow-up strategy: 1. At a minimum, follow-up visits with a complete physical examination, including a pelvic-rectal exam and a patient history, should be conducted by a physician experienced in the surveillance of cancer patients. 2. There is little evidence to suggest that vaginal vault cytology adds significantly to the clinical exam in detecting early disease recurrence. 3. Routine use of various other radiologic or biologic follow-up investigations in asymptomatic patients is not advocated, because the role of those investigations has yet to be evaluated in a definitive manner. 4. A reasonable follow-up schedule involves follow-up visits every 3-4 months in the first 2 years and every 6-12 months in years 3-5. Patients should return to annual population-based general physical and pelvic examinations after 5 years of recurrence-free follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; follow-up; practice guideline; recurrence; schedule; surveillance

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567627      PMCID: PMC2880906          DOI: 10.3747/co.v17i3.514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  21 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laurie Elit; Anthony W Fyles; Michaela C Devries; Thomas K Oliver; Michael Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Relapse patterns in FIGO stage IB carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  K Y Look; T F Rocereto
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation.

Authors:  G P Browman; M N Levine; E A Mohide; R S Hayward; K I Pritchard; A Gafni; A Laupacis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Cytologic follow-up of patients with invasive cervical carcinoma treated by radiotherapy.

Authors:  D Muram; R H Curry; P Drouin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  The role of clinical follow up in early stage cervical cancer in South Wales.

Authors:  K C K Lim; R E J Howells; A S Evans
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy: an analysis of clinical aspects and prognosis.

Authors:  R. A. K. Samlal; J. Van Der Velden; T. Van Eerden; M. S. Schilthuis; D. Gonzalez Gonzalez; F. B. Lammes
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  PAP smear after radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  M A Rintala; V T Rantanen; T A Salmi; P J Klemi; S E Grénman
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  A comparison of symptomatology, physical examination, and vaginal cytology in the detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  A P Soisson; G Geszler; J T Soper; A Berchuck; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Value of routine follow-up procedures for patients with stage I/II cervical cancer treated with combined surgery-radiation therapy.

Authors:  P Morice; C Deyrolle; A Rey; D Atallah; P Pautier; S Camatte; A Thoury; C Lhomme; C Haie-Meder; D Castaigne
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  19 in total

1.  A report of human papilloma virus-16 associated vaginal carcinoma after thirty-two years of successful radiation therapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Gazal Jain; Sasidharanpillai Sabeena; Akhila Vasudeva; Anjali Mundkur; Srilatha Parampalli Srinivas; G Arunkumar; Pratap Kumar
Journal:  Virusdisease       Date:  2018-08-03

2.  Treatment outcomes of patients with cervical cancer with complete metabolic responses after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Mehmet Reyhan; Ozan C Guler; Ali Fuat Yapar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  PET-detected asymptomatic recurrence is associated with improved survival in recurrent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jocelyn S Chapman; I-Chow Hsu; Pamela N Peters; William E Pierson; Lee-May Chen; Antonio C Westphalen
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-08

4.  Breast and cervical cancer screening behaviours among colorectal cancer survivors in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  M Corkum; R Urquhart; G Kephart; J A Hayden; G Porter
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  The role of PET/CT in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fernanda G Herrera; John O Prior
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements in oncology--an assessment of their methodological quality.

Authors:  Carmel Jacobs; Ian D Graham; Julie Makarski; Michaël Chassé; Dean Fergusson; Brian Hutton; Mark Clemons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Surveillance and Care of the Gynecologic Cancer Survivor.

Authors:  Stephanie S Faubion; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Margaret E Long; Sandhya Pruthi; Petra M Casey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  A prognostic nomogram integrating novel biomarkers identified by machine learning for cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yimin Li; Shun Lu; Mei Lan; Xinhao Peng; Zijian Zhang; Jinyi Lang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Adelaide Fernanda Ribeiro Cubal; Joana Isabel Ferreira Carvalho; Maria Fernanda Martins Costa; Ana Paula Tavares Branco
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-08

10.  Patterns of diagnostic imaging and associated radiation exposure among long-term survivors of young adult cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Corinne Daly; David R Urbach; Thérèse A Stukel; Paul C Nathan; Wayne Deitel; Lawrence F Paszat; Andrew S Wilton; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.